Abstract
The phrase “philosophy of religion” has various denotations and connotations. It has been generally used as a philosophical defense of religious convictions — of natural as well as of revealed theology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
James Boswell:“An Account of My Last Interviem withg David Hume, Eaq.,” in Private Papers of James Boswell, ed, by G, Cott and F. Pottle, Mount Vermon, 1931. Reprinted as Appendix A to the Introductionm H. K: (ed) Hume’s Concerning Natural Religion
C. N. K. Smith: Commentary, 1923
K, Rosenkranz and F. W. Schubert(ed) Immanuel Kants Samtliche Werke, 12 vols,. Leipzig, 1838–1842
Karl Barth (Protestant Thought from Rousseau to Ritschl, trans. B. Cozens, New York, 1959, p. 187
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mall, R.A. (1975). Hume and Kant on the Philosophy of Religion. In: Naturalism and Criticism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1347-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1347-5_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1739-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1347-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive