Abstract
Our task in this chapter is (i) to undertake a delimitation of the frontier of formal logic within the total realm of thought and further, (ii) to study the exact nature of this discipline along with its inner stratifications and outer ramifications. In connection with formal logic Husserl was chiefly preoccupied with these two problems. What he has given us therefore in his Logische Untersuchungen and the Formale und transzendentale Logik is not a system of logic but a systematic meta-logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Compare Y. Bar-Hillel, ‘Husserl’s “Conception of a Purely Logical Grammar,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1956–7, pp. 362 – 9.
For criticism of Carnap’s identification of logic with syntax, see M. Black,Problems of Analysis, Cornell U.P., 1954, Ch. XIV.
Veatch’s Intentional Logic, Yale, 1952, developed on Aristotelian lines, should not therefore be taken to be entirely in line with Husserl.
L. S. Stebbing, A Modem Introduction to Logic, London, 1946, 5th edition, p. 174.
Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard, 1953, p. 23.
Herman Weyl, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton, 1949, p. 27. For the method of constructing such a mold, see Weyl, p. 25, and Tarski, Introduction to Logic, New York, 1941, Ch. VI.
Dewey, Experience and Nature, London, 1929, p. 195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1976 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mohanty, J.N. (1976). Formal Logic. In: Edmund Husserl’s Theory of Meaning. Phaenomenologica, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1337-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1337-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1339-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1337-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive