The Thermodynamics of Trace Element Distribution

  • R. K. O’Nions
  • R. Powell
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (ASIC, volume 30)


Conventionally, elements are categorized as major, minor or trace depending upon their relative abundances in the system of interest. The divisions between these three categories have not been rigidly fixed, but the term trace element has frequently been used for any element whose abundance is 1000 ppm or less. At very low concentrations of a trace solute constituent, the thermodynamic behaviour of the solution may be expected to approach that of an ideal dilute solution. The concentration range over which Henry’s Law is obeyed by a given trace constituent cannot as yet be predicted and must be determined by experiment. It is unfortunate that the term trace element as currently used encompasses concentration ranges where departures from Henry’s Law may occur. As more data become available on the solution behaviour of trace elements some qualifications of the term may prove worthwhile.


Distribution Coefficient Solar Nebula Trace Element Distribution Trace Constituent Solar Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, D.L. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 86, 1593 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, L.L., Walsh, P.N., White, D. Jour. Phys. Chem., 71, 2707 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. Boynton, W.V. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 29, 569 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broecker, W.S., Oversby, V.M. “Chemical equilibria in the Earth”, McGraw Hill (1971).Google Scholar
  5. Carmichael, I.S.E., Turner, F.J., Veerhoogen, J. “Igneous petrology”, 739 pp. McGraw Hill (1974).Google Scholar
  6. Carmichael, I.S.E., Smith, A.L., Mineral., 55, 246 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Drake, M.J., Weill, D.F., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 39, 689 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, D.G. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 39, 1525 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman, L. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 39, 1119 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossman, L., Ganapathy, R. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 40, 331 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Häkli, T., Wright, T.L. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 31, 877 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson, L.M., Kracek, F.C. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 49, 739 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kushiro, I. Jour. Petrology, 13, 311 (1972).Google Scholar
  14. Kushiro, I. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Yearb., 73, 248 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. McIntire, W.L. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 27, 1209 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mysen, B., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 311 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Nicholls, J., Carmichael, I.S.E., Stormer, J.C. Contr. Mineral. Petrol., 33 (1971).Google Scholar
  18. Shimizu, N. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 38, 1789 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tanaka, T., Masuda, A. Icarus, 19, 523 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wood, B.J., Fraser, D.G. “Elementary Thermodynamics for Geologists”, 303 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. O’Nions
    • 1
  • R. Powell
    • 2
  1. 1.Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia UniversityPalisadesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations