Abstract
One central idea involved in the Myth of the Given is that, according to it, there is some kind of analytic, ostensive tie between one’s descriptive vocabulary and the extralinguistic world so that this descriptive vocabulary gets a privileged status. Especially, the meaning of an observational predicate (e.g., ‘red’) is taken to be determined by what is immediately “given” at the time of the acceptance of any observational sentence containing that predicate. This “given” could be something external (to the person), which causally brings about the person’s acceptance (or disposition to accept) the relevant observational sentence or it could be an extralinguistic sensory event (sense datum) which leads the agent to accept the observational sentence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuomela, R. (1977). Concept Formation in Psychology. In: Human Action and Its Explanation. Synthese Library, vol 116. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1242-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1242-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1244-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1242-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive