Abstract
As is well known few of even the best established scientific hypotheses have been or could ever be conclusively proven to be true. While for example we firmly believe that all samples of copper expand when heated, this cannot be conclusively proven true since what we have here is a universal statement referring to an open class, not all of whose members could ever be observed. The widely accepted hypothesis ‘Some gases consist of discrete particles’, though not a universal statement, nevertheless cannot definitely be shown to be true since it asserts something unobservable. It is only that the hypothesis together with a large number of other hypotheses and assumptions logically implies some true observation statements — statements which are not implied by any other known set of hypotheses and assumptions of comparable adequacy. This confers merely what is called confirmation upon the hypothesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schlesinger, G. (1977). Stating the Problem of Evil. In: Religion and Scientific Method. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1235-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1235-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0816-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1235-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive