Skip to main content

On Propositions and Physical System

  • Chapter
Quantum Mechanics, A Half Century Later

Part of the book series: Episteme ((EPIS,volume 5))

  • 112 Accesses

Abstract

It is pointed out that some already known inequalities (Bell’s inequalities) and some new ones presented here can be used to test experimentally the validity of a general conception of the foundations of microphysics. This conception mainly consists in considering sets of propositions (having the structure of lattices but possibly of non-Boolean ones) and in assuming that when a proposition is true on a system S this constitutes an intrinsic property of S. It is shown that the results of some recent experiments corroborating the quantum mechanical predictions can be used to invalidate directly the general conception just described. This is done without reference to the general principles of quantum mechanics. More generally, our derivation does not depend for its validity on assuming the truth of any particular physical theory abstracted by induction from experimental knowledge.

This text has already been published in Physical Review D 11 (1975), 1424, under the title ‘Use of Inequalities for the Experimental Test of a General Conception of the Foundation of Microphysics’. We thank the editors of this journal for kindly permitting its reproduction in this series.

Laboratoire associé au Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bell, J. S., Physics 1 (1964), 195.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wigner, E. P., American Journ. Of Physics 38 (1970), 1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clauser, J. F., Home, M. A., Shimony, A., and Holt, R. A., Phys. Rev. Letters 23 (1969), 880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jauch, J. M., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics,Addison Wesley, Reading Mass, U.S.A.; Mehra, J. (ed.), The Physicist’s Conception of Nature,D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  5. von Weizsäcker, C. F., Natürwiss. 42 (1955), 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jauch, J. M. and Piron, C., HeIv. Phys. Acta 42 (1969), 842.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bohm, D., Quantum Mechanics,Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, proceedings of the IL Enrico Fermi International Summer School, Acad. Press, New York (esp. articles by J. M. Jauch, J. S. Bell, L. Kasday, A. Shimony, E. Wigner, B. de Witt); B. d’Espagnat, Conception de la Physique Contemporaine, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N., Phys. Rev. 47 (1935), 777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gutkowski, D. and Masotto, G., Catania preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bell, J. S., in Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kasday, L., in Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freedman, S. J. and Clauser, J. F., Phys. Rev. Letters 28 (1972), 938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horne, M. A., Harward report.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faraci, G., Notarrigo, S., Pennisi, A., Gutkowski, D., Boll. SIF 93 (1972), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lahemi, M. and Mittig, M., Phys. Rev. 14D (1976), 2543.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shimony, A., in Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Broglie, L., Journ. de Phys. 5 (1927), 225.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bohm, D., Phys. Rev. 85 (1952), 166, 180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell, J. S., On the Hypothesis that the Schrödinger Equation is Exact’, Contrib. to Penn. State Univ. Conference (Sept. 1971 ) Ref. TH 1424 CERN.

    Google Scholar 

  21. von Neumann, J., Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics ( Engl. translation ), Princeton 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wigner, E. P., Remarks on the Mind Body Question in the Scientist Speculates, London; article in Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  23. London, F. and Bauer, E., la théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique,Hermann, Paris. Costa de Beauregard, O., Boston preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Everett, H., Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957), 454. de Witt, B., in Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper, L. N. and van Vechten, D., Amer. Journ. Phys. 37 (1969), 1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Einstein, A., in P. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein Philosopher Scientist,Lib. of Living Philosophers Evanston Ill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’espagnat, B. (1977). On Propositions and Physical System. In: Lopes, J.L., Paty, M. (eds) Quantum Mechanics, A Half Century Later. Episteme, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1196-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1196-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1198-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1196-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics