Axiomatics and the Search for the Foundations of Physics

  • M. Omelyanovsky
Part of the The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science book series (WONS, volume 10)


The paper deals with the peculiarities of the axiomatic method in physics. The heuristic role of the axiomatic method is underlined; its ability to increase scientific knowledge. The ability of axiomatic systems for development is analysed. Attention is concentrated on the dialectical character of physical axiomatics.


Quantum Mechanic Special Theory Classical Physic Axiomatic System Newtonian Mechanic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bohr, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete’, Physical Review 48, 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourbaki, N.: 1962, ‘L’Architecture des Mathématiques,’ Dans: Les grands courants de la pensée mathématiques (Presentes par F. Le Lionnais), Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Einstein, A.: 1954, ‘What’s the Theory of Relativity’, in Ideas and Opinions, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Einstein, A.: 1964, Relativity, the Special and General Theory, London.Google Scholar
  5. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be considered Complete’, Physical Review 47, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fock, V. A.: 1936, ‘Fundamental Significance of Approximation Methods in Theoretical Physics’, in Advances in the Physical Sciences, Vol. XVI, Issue 8 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Hilbert, D.: 1900, Über den Zahlbegriff. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, Bd. 8, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  8. Kleene, S. C.: 1952, Introduction to Metamathematics, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  9. Lenin, V. I.: 1968a, Collected Works, Vol. 14, Moscow.Google Scholar
  10. Lenin, V. I.: 1968b, Collected Works, Vol. 38, Moscow.Google Scholar
  11. Newton, L: 1952, Optics.Third book of Optics, Part 1, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Podgoretsky, M. I. and Smorodinsky, Y. A.: 1969, ‘On the Axiomatic Structure of Physical Theories’, in Questions of the Theory of Knowledge (in Russian), Moscow, p. 74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Omelyanovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyMoscowUSSR

Personalised recommendations