Skip to main content

Empirical Meaningfulness of Quantitative Statements

  • Chapter
Book cover Twenty-Five Years of Logical Methodology in Poland

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 87))

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

The main object of our analysis is Suppes’s well-known criterion of empirical meaningfulness for quantitative statements proposed in Suppes (1959), and our main purpose is to show this criterion to be a particular instance of some general criterion of empirical meaningfulness applicable to arbitrary statements. Such a criterion has been put forward in Przelęcki (1969). It is based on the same fundamental idea that underlies Suppes’s criterion: a connection between meaningfulness and invariance in truth value of a given statement. The criterion is applicable to all empirical languages that can be formalized within first-order predicate logic.

Reprinted from Synthese 26 (1974), D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • M. Przelecki, The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Sneed, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Suppes, ‘A Set of Independent Axioms for Extensive Quantities’, Portugaliae Mathematica 10 (1951), 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Suppes, ‘Measurement, Empirical Meaningfulness, and Three-Valued Logic’, in Measurement: Definitions and Theories (ed. by C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh), Wiley, New York 1959, pp. 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. For a closer examination of the kind of interpretation characteristic of empirical languages see Przełęcki (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The notions of EM1 and EM2 defined above coincide with those of DT1 and DT2 as defined in Przełęcki (1969) provided the set P 0 contains nothing but taur tologies.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Although two kinds of variables are used in L 0 and L1 as characterized above (and, consequently, two domains appear in their models), the languages may easily be modified to conform to the general pattern described in Section I: that of a one-sorted language formalized within first-order predicate logic.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The original definition in Suppes (1959) abstracts from any connections between the mass function m and the empirical relations corresponding to terms R and O. Therefore it lacks the clauses requiring that should be a model of P o and of P1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See e.g. Suppes (1951), (1959), and Sneed (1971), p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Marian Przełęcki Ryszard Wójcicki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 PWN - Polish Scientific Publishers - Warszawa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Przełęcki, M. (1977). Empirical Meaningfulness of Quantitative Statements. In: Przełęcki, M., Wójcicki, R. (eds) Twenty-Five Years of Logical Methodology in Poland. Synthese Library, vol 87. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1126-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1126-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1128-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1126-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics