Marx, Feuerbach, Bauer

  • Zvi Rosen
Part of the Studies in Social History book series (SISH, volume 2)

Abstract

The problem of the relations between Marx on the one hand, and Feuerbach and Bauer on the other is more complex than is generally imagined. We have already seen on several occasions that it is useless to draw a straight line from Feuerbach to Marx and that Bauerian influences are evident in certain spheres in which it has been claimed that Marx bears affinity to Feuerbach.

Keywords

Posit Stein Rosen Defend Editing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    MEGA I, 1, i, p. LXXIII.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preliminary Theses on the Reform of Philosophy. SWr 168.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid. pp. 169–170. See also, ibid. pp. 153, 155, 162, 164–165; Principles of the Philosophy of the Future, ibid. §§ 1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11.Google Scholar
  4. 4a.
    See for example, Louis Dupré: The Philosophical Foundations of Marxism, New York/Chicago, Harcourt, Brace & World 1966, pp. 87–108; Shlomo Avineri: The Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx, pp. 12–43Google Scholar
  5. 4b.
    Karl Marx: Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Introduction by Joseph O’Malley, pp. IX–XIII, XXVII–XXXII, Cambridge University Press 1970Google Scholar
  6. 4c.
    Karl Marx: Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Introduction by Joseph O’Malley, pp. XXVII–XXXII, Cambridge University Press 1970; Robert Tucker: Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx, pp. 102–105; David McLellan: Marx before Marxism, pp. 103–104.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    MEGA I, 1, i, p. LXXIII; SWr 154.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
  9. 7.
    ChS 35, 39; ThS 61–62; Syn I, p. VII.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    MEGA I, 1, i, p. 119.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Ibid. p. 105.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    Über Philosophie und Christentum, SW I, 72.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    MEGA I, 1, ii, p. 235.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Cf. Bauer’s letter to Marx, 12 April 1841 (ibid. p. 253).Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Ibid. p. 261.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Briefwechsel und Tagebuchblätter, p. 239.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Cf. Bauer’s letter to Ruge, 6 December 1841.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    See, for example, Bruno Bauer oder die Entwicklung des theologischen Humanismus unserer Tage, p. 75.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    For this issue cf. Bauer’s letter to Marx, 26 January 1842 (MEGA I, 1, ii, p. 266); Noch ein Wort über “Bruno Bauer und die akademische Lehrfreiheit von Dr. O. F. Gruppe. Berlin 1842” (MEGA, I, 1, i, pp. 397–400); A. Cornu: Karl Marx und Friedrich Engels. Leben und Werk, vol. I, pp. 268–269.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    MEGA I, 1, ii, p. 272.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Ibid. p. 261.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Cf. part one, ch. IX, n. 50.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Ruge: Briefwechsel und Tagebuchblätter, p. 247; Klutentreter: Die Rheinische Zeitung von 1842/43..., p. 31.Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    Bruno Bauer oder die Entwicklung des theologischen Humanismus unserer Tage, pp. 55, 69.Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    MEGA I, 1i, ii, p. 308.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    Modern scholars take a similar stand in evaluating Feuerbach’s attitude toward politics. Kamenka, for example, points out that Feuerbach contented himself with formulating a few phrases, such as that the God of religion and the spirit or the absolute of philosophy possess the same monarchistic pretensions; that the philosophical hierarchy creates a political hierarchy and vice versa, — and says that in actual fact Feuerbach never plumbed the depths of any political issue. Cf. E. Kamenka: The Philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul 1970, pp. 90–91.Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    MEGA I, 1, i, pp. 174–175; Ph 95.Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    Hans-Martin Sass: Feuerbach statt Marx. Zur Verfasserschaft des Aufsatzes “Luther als Schiedsrichter zwischen Strauss und Feuerbach”. International Review of Social History. Vol. XII, 1967, pp. 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 27.
    Über die neueste preussische Zensurinstruktion, MEGA I, 1, i, pp. 151–173.Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    Briefwechsel und Tagebuchblätter, pp. 260–261.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    Marx before Marxism, p. 108.Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    MEGA I, 1, ii, p. 269.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    Ibid. p. 257.Google Scholar
  34. 32.
    Ibid. pp. 272, 278.Google Scholar
  35. 33.
    Cf. part two, ch. IV, n. 24.Google Scholar
  36. 34.
    MEGA I, 1, i, p. 282.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    Ibid. p. 283.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    Ibid. pp. 278, 300, 303.Google Scholar
  39. 37.
    Zur Kritik des gegenwärtigen Staats- und Völkerrechts. HJ 1840, No 151–156.Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Ibid. No 152, pp. 1210–1211; No 153, p. 1221; No 154, pp. 1225–1228.Google Scholar
  41. 39.
    Arthur McGovern: K. Marx’ First Political Writings. The Rheinische Zeitung 1842–1843. In Demythologizing Marxism. Boston College Studies in Philosophy. Vol. II, 1969, p. 21.Google Scholar
  42. 40.
    MEGA I, 1, iii, pp. 152–153; Ph 316–317.Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    Ibid. p. 153; Ph 317.Google Scholar
  44. 42.
    See for example MEGA I, 1, i, p. 418.Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    Cf. ibid. p. 501.Google Scholar
  46. 44.
    Cf. ibid. I, 1, ii, pp. 105–106.Google Scholar
  47. 45a.
    For all of this cf. John Henry Mackay: Max Stirner. Sein Leben und Werk, Berlin 1898, pp. 68–72Google Scholar
  48. 45b.
    John Henry Mackay: Max Stirner. Sein Leben und Werk, Berlin 1898, pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
  49. 46.
    See Marx’s letter to Ruge, 30 November 1842 (MEGA I, 1, ii, pp. 285–287).Google Scholar
  50. 47.
    Ibid. p. 278; Ruge: Briefwechsel und Tagebuchblätter, p. 288.Google Scholar
  51. 48.
    Ibid. p. 292; Briefwechsel und Tagebuchblätter, p. 290.Google Scholar
  52. 49.
    Ibid. I, 1, iii, p. 151; Ph 315.Google Scholar
  53. 50.
  54. 51.
    The Philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach, p. 90.Google Scholar
  55. 52.
    Principles of the Philosophy of Future, SWr § 5, p. 178.Google Scholar
  56. 53.
    Ibid. § 14, p. 192.Google Scholar
  57. 54.
    Ibid. § 15, p. 194.Google Scholar
  58. 55.
    Preliminary Theses on the Reform of Philosophy, ibid. p. 155.Google Scholar
  59. 56.
    Ibid. p. 157.Google Scholar
  60. 57.
    Ibid. p. 155.Google Scholar
  61. 58.
    Ibid. p. 157.Google Scholar
  62. 59.
    Ludwig Feuerbach in seinem Briefwechsel und Nachlass, p. 407.Google Scholar
  63. 60.
  64. 61.
  65. 62.
    Das Wesen des Christentums in Beziehung auf den “Einzigen und sein Eigentum”. Wigands Vierteljahrsschrift, Leipzig 1845. No. 2.Google Scholar
  66. 63.
    GI 53–54.Google Scholar
  67. 64.
    LF 105, 128–131.Google Scholar
  68. 65.
  69. 66.
    For this issue see Hans-Martin Sass: Feuerbachs Prospekt einer neuen Philosophie, Revue Internationale de Philosophie. Bruxelles 1972. No 101, p. 269.Google Scholar
  70. 67.
    E; Das Wesen der Religion, SW I, 418–422, 426–439.Google Scholar
  71. 68.
    Pol 243, 245.Google Scholar
  72. 69.
    Das Wesen des Christentums in Beziehung auf den “Einzigen und sein Eigentum”, SW I, 349.Google Scholar
  73. 70.
  74. 71.
    For this issue cf. Iring Fetscher: Marx and Marxism, pp. 267–270.Google Scholar
  75. 72.
    Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der klassischen deutschen Philosophie, p. 272.Google Scholar
  76. 73.
    MEGA I, 1, iii, p. 123; Ph 312.Google Scholar
  77. 74.
    Ibid. p. 327; HF 201.Google Scholar
  78. 75.
    Ibid. pp. 306–308; HF 175–177.Google Scholar
  79. 76.
    Karl Marx, p. 153.Google Scholar
  80. 77.
    GI 53–60; see also Theses on Feuerbach, Pol 243–245.Google Scholar
  81. 78.
    Cf. for exmaple, J.-Y. Calvez: La pensée de Karl Marx, p. 121; see also Nicolas Lobko-wicz: Theory and Praxis. History of a Concept from Aristotle to Marx, p. 251.Google Scholar
  82. 79.
    Löwith has recently pointed this out in his analysis of the Hegelian dialectical issue of mediation and immediacy which Marx follows to a large extent, while Feuerbach almost totally ignored it. Cf Karl Löwith: Vermittlung und Unmittelbarkeit bei Hegel, Marx und Feuerbach. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1972, No 101, pp. 308–335.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zvi Rosen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations