Existential Speech and the Phenomenology of Communication
The thematic question with which we started in the initial chapter of this study was that formulated by Searle, namely, “How do words relate to the world?” It is this question which led us to examine speech acts, their structure and content, and their performance or process nature in the constitution of ‘communication’ as a state of affairs. In short, we analyzed what language and speech seemed to be in view of how they are used in the ordinary discourse of common situations. In this chapter,198 I wish to take the analysis one step further, and in a different direction, by examining how phenomena such as language and speech are constituted by a person who generates a ‘world’ of such phenomena. It is, if you will, the phenomenological explanation that necessarily follows from the analytic description of human communication.199
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 199.Walter Cerf, “Critical Review of How to Do Things with Words” in Symposium on J. L. Austin, ed. by K. T. Fann (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969), 374–379;Google Scholar
- Paul Ricoeur, “Phenomenology of Freedom” in Phenomenology and Philosophical Understanding, ed. Edo Pivcevic (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 173–194.Google Scholar
- 200.J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers, 2nd ed., ed. by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (London: Oxford University Press, 1970), p. 108.Google Scholar
- Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1962), p. 61.Google Scholar
- 202.Maurice Merleau-Ponty, In Praise of Philosophy, trans. by John Wild and James Edie (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. 20Google Scholar