Skip to main content

Immunomodulatory Function of MHC Peptides

  • Chapter
  • 158 Accesses

Abstract

Our continuing dependence on long-term broad spectrum immunosuppression, coupled with a growing understanding of the mechanisms mediating the alloimmune response, has led to an increasing focus on the development of alternative, more specific forms of immunotherapy in the hope of inducing transplant tolerance. In recent years it has become apparent that the peptide bound by the MHC molecule plays a major influential role in the initial T cell receptor interaction with the MHC/peptide complex, and also in the subsequent T cell response. There is now extensive experimental evidence in vitro and in vivo, that varying the nature of the bound peptide provides an effective means of manipulating the immune response. It would appear, however, that the role of peptides as immunosuppressants is not limited to the disruption of antigen recognition alone, but rather they may exert their effects through many diverse mechanisms including inhibition of cell cycle progresssion, altered signal transduction and the induction of apoptosis. The potential, therefore, exists that peptides, or compounds derived from them, may represent an exciting new form of immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nashan B, Moor R, Amlot P, et al. Randomised trial of bsiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. Lancet 1997;350:1193–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincenti F, Kirkman R, Light S, et al. Interleukin-2-receptor blockade with daclizumab to prevent acure rejection in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 1998;338:161–165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nashan B, Light S, Hardie IR, et al. Reduction of acute renal allograft rejection by daclizumab. Transplantation 1999;67:110–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahan BD, Rajagopalan PR, Hall M. Reduction of the occurrence of acute cellular rejection among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2-receptor monoclonal antibody. Transplantation 1999;67:276–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boelaars-van Haperen MJAM, Baan CC, van Riemsdijk IC, et al: Treatment with the chimeric anti-IL2Rα antibody basiliximab prevents the development of renal rejection by affecting the IL-2 and IL-15 pathway. XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society (Abstract OAP17) pg. 28, Aurg. 27–Sept. 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goebel J, Stevens E, Forrest K, et al: Daclizumab (dac) blocks early interleukin (IL)-2 receptor ® signaling. XVII International Congress of the Transplantation Society (Abstract #P0528), pg. 316, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Souillou JP, Cantarovich D, LeMauff B, et al. Randomized controlled trial of monoclonal antibody against rejection of renal allografts. N Eng J Med 1990;322:1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krikman RL, Shapiro ME, Carpenter DB, et al. A randomized prospective trial of anti-Tac monoclonal antibody in human renal transplantation. Transplantation 1991; 51:107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kriaa F, Hiesse C, Alard P, et al. Prophylactic use of the anti-IL-2-receptor monoclonal antibody LO-Tact-I in cadaveric renal transplantation: results of a randomized study. Transplant Proc 1993;25:817–819.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van Gelder T, Zietse R, Mulder AH, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (BT563) administration to prevent acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1995;60:248–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vincenti F, Lantz M, Birnbaum J, et al. A phase I tirla of humanized anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibody in renal transplantation. Transplantation 1997;63:33–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amlot PL, Rawlings E, Fernando ON, et al. Prolonged action of chiameric IL-2 receptor (CD25) monoclonal antibody used in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation, 1995;60:748–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkman RL, Bumgardner G, Gaston RS, et al. Addition of daclizumab to mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and steroids in renal transplantation: pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy. (Submitted for publication, Clinical Transplantation).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davies E, Lawen J, Mourad G, et al. Basiliximab (Simulect®) is safe and effective in combination with Neoral®, steroids, and CellCept® for the prevention of acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation. Interim results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. (Abstract #A3672) Amer. Soc Nephrology 32nd annual meeting, Nov. 1–8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ciancio G, Miller A, Cespedes M, et al: Daclizumab induction for primary kidney transplant recipients using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as maintenance immunosuppression. XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society. (Abstract OAP27), pg. 46, Aug. 27–Sept. 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deierhoi MH, Hudson SL, Gaston RS: Clinical experience with a two dose regimen of daclizumab in cadaveric renal transplantation. (Abstract #574) pg. S75, AST Transplant 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lebranchu Y, Hurault de Ligny B, Toupance O, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of Simulect® versus Thymoglobuline® in renal transplantation, (Abstract #567) pg. S74, AST Transplant 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sollinger H, Kaplan B, Pewscovitz M, et al: A multicenter, randomized trial of Simulect? with early Neoral® vs. ATGAM® with delayed Neoral in renal transplantation,. XVIII International Congress of the Transplantation Soceity (Abstract #0113) pg. 29, Aug. 27–Sept 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hong JC, Kahan BD. Interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies and sirolimus: a novel induction immunosuppression strategy. Transplantation & Immunology Letter XVI:7–9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Landsberg DN, Cole EH, Russell D, et al. Renal transplantation without steroids — one year results of a multicentre Canadian pilot study. (Abstract #86), pg. S49, AST Transplant 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vincenti F, Monaco A, Grinyo J, et al. Rapid steroid withdrawal versus standard steroid treatment in patients treated with Simulect®, Neoral®, and Cellcept® for the prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation: a multicenter, randomized trial. (Abstract #83) pg. S49, AST Transplant 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vincenti F, Ramos E, Brattstrom C, Cho S, Ekberg H, Grinyo J, Johnson R, Kuypers D, Stuart F, Khanna A, Navarro M, Nashan B. Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation. In Press, Transplantation, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kreis H, Cisterne J-M, Land @, et al. Sirolimus inassociation with mycophenolate mofetil induction for the prevention of acute graft rejection in renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 69:1252–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tellides G, Dallman MJ, Morris PJ. Synergistic interaction of cyclosporine A with interleukin 2 receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. Transplantation Proc 1988;20(Suppl 2):202–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baan CC, Knoop CJ, van Gelder T, et al. Anti-CD25 therapy reveals the redundancy of the intragraft cytokine network after clinical heart transplantation. Transplantation 1999;67:870–876.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang, GJ, Harish H, Mahanty, Vincenti F, et al. A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function. Clinical Transplantation 2000; 14:545–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murphy, B., Krensky, A. (2001). Immunomodulatory Function of MHC Peptides. In: Sayegh, M.H., Remuzzi, G. (eds) Current and Future Immunosuppressive Therapies Following Transplantation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1005-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1005-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3876-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1005-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics