Skip to main content

Ecotoxicity of River and Spring Sediment along the Hanford Reach

  • Chapter
Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAIV,volume 4))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

The Hanford Site was established in 1943 in order to produce plutonium for some of the nuclear weapons tested and used in World War II (Dirkes and Hanf 1997). These historic operations resulted in the production of both radiological and nonradiological wastes. In 1988, the Hanford Site was placed on the National Priorities List for environmental cleanup by the US Environmental Protection Agency. In recent years, efforts at the site have focused on characterizing and remediating contaminants in these wastes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. ASTM (American Society of Testing and Materials) (1994a) Standard guide for conducting sediment toxicity tests with freshwater invertebrates (E 1383–94). In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 11.04. ASTM, Philadelphia, p 1196

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASTM (American Society of Testing and Materials) (1994b) Standard guide for collection, storage, characterization, and manipulation of sediments for toxicological testing (E 1391–90). In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol 11.04. ASTM, Philadelphia, p 1226

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker DS, Ginn TC (1995) Effects of storage time on toxicity of sediments from Puget Sound, Washington. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:829–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker DS, Rose CD, Bigham GN (1995) Comparison of the 10-day freshwater sediment toxicity tests usingHyalella aztecaandChironomus tetans.Environ Toxicol Chem 14:2089–2094

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanton ML, Gardiner WW, Dirkes RL (1995) Environmental monitoring of Columbia River sediments: Grain-size distribution and contaminant association, PNL-10535, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Calabrese EJ, Baldwin LA (1997) The dose determines the stimulation (and poison): Development of a chemical hormesis database. Int J Toxicol 16:545–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Delistraty DA (1986) Growth and photosynthetic response of a freshwater algaSelenastrum capricornutumto an oil shale by-product water. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 36:114–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dirkes RL, Hanf RW (eds) (1997) Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1996, PNNL11472. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friant SL, Brandt CA (1994) Ecological risk assessment of radionuclides in the Columbia River system-A historical assessment. In: A Review of Ecological Assessment Case Studies from a Risk Assessment Perspective, vol II, EPA/630/R-94/003. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p 3–1

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hamelink JL, Landrum PF, Bergman HL, Benson WH (eds) (1994) Bioavailability: Physical, chemical, and biological interactions, Lewis Pub, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  11. Higley KA, Kuperman R (1996) Ecotoxicological benchmarks for radionuclide contaminants at RFETS, Appendix C. In: Ecological Risk Assessment Methodology, Technical Memorandum for Ecological Chemicals of Concern (ECOCs) Screening Methodology, RF/ER-96–0039. Kaiser-Hill/Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site

    Google Scholar 

  12. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (1992) Effects of ionizing radiation on plants and animals at levels implied by current radiation protection standards, Tech Rep Ser No 332. IAEA, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ingersoll CG (1995) Sediment tests. In: Rand GM (ed) Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology, 2“ ed. Taylor &Francis,Washington,DC, p 231

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones DS, Suter GW, Hull RN (1997) Toxicological benchmarks for screening contaminants of potential concern for effects on sediment-associated biota: 1997 revision, ES/ER/TM-95/R4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luckey TD (1982) Physiological benefits from low levels of ionizing radiation. Health Phys 43:771–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Persaud D, Jaagumagi R, Hayton A (1992) Guidelines for the protection and management of aquatic sediment quality in Ontario, ISBN 0–7729–9248–7. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Toronto, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phipps GL, Mattson VR, Ankley GT (1995) Relative sensitivity of three freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates to ten contaminants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 28:281–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. PNNL (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) (1998) Screening assessment and requirements for a comprehensive assessment: Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment, DOE/RL-96–16. US Department of Energy, Richland, WA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Power EA, Chapman PM (1992) Assessing sediment quality. In: Burtbn GA (ed) Sediment Toxicity Assessment. Lewis Pub, Boca Raton, FL, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saldi KA, Dirkes RL (1996) Surface water and sediment surveillance. In: Dirkes RL, Hanf RW (eds) Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1995, PNNL-11139. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, p 109

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saldi KA, Dirkes RL, Blanton ML (1995) Surface water surveillance. In: Dirkes RL, Hanf RW (eds) Hanford site environmental report for calendar year 1994, PNL-10574. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stebbing ARD (1997) A theory for growth hormesis. BELLE Newsletter 6(2):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tatem HE (1988) Use ofDaphnia magnaandMysidopsis almyrato assess sediment toxicity. Water Quality ‘88, Seminar Proceedings, Charleston, SC. US Army Corps of Engineers Committee on Water Quality, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  24. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates, EPA/600/R94/024. USEPA, Duluth, MN, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  25. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Calculation and evaluation of sediment effect concentrations for the amphipodHyallela aztecaand the midgeChironomus riparius, EPA 905-R96008. USEPA, Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  26. USEPA-USCOE (US Environmental Protection Agency and US Army Corps of Engineers) (1998). Evaluation of dredged material proposed for discharge in waters of the U.S.-Testing manual, EPA-823B-94–004. USEPA, Washington, DC, p 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nded. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delistraty, D.A., Yokel, J. (2001). Ecotoxicity of River and Spring Sediment along the Hanford Reach. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks. NATO Science Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0024-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0987-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics