Abstract
An independent environmental evaluation has been made of the expected pollution caused by airplane fuel burning from 240 commercial flights each day (one every 6 minutes) on the health of the population residing in the landing and take-off pattern (LTO) in Orange County, CA. The source of the proposed pollution is from conversion of the El Toro Marine Air Base to civilian airport operations. Calculations have been made to estimate the proposed pollutant input from fuel burning in the LTO pattern using as examples, two airplanes - the Boeing 727-200 (three engines) and the Boeing 767-200 (two engines). If all aircraft were the Boeing 727, the amount of fuel burned would be 338,400 kg each day and, for the Boeing 767, the amount would be 410,400 kg. The fuel consumed daily in the LTO by the more efficient Boeing 767 would emit combustion products including hydrocarbons - 1515 kg; carbon monoxide -6960 kg; nitrogen oxides - 5144 kg, as well as soot particles, sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds and other byproducts. These pollutant chemicals would be dispersed into a hypothetical South Coast Air Basin “bath tub” of (48 x 24 x 0.244) km3 when a meteorological inversion of 350 m is present, see Figure 1. The point source for aircraft pollutant emission at the airport is defined as having an average ground level height of 106 m above sea level to the inversion layer of 350 m with dimensions of (1 x 1 x 0.244) km3. For carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and other contaminants, the concentration and exposure time are of particular importance to the health of people living in the region. Under meteorological conditions of ocean fog in the mountainous terrain, often prevailing in the South Coast Air Basin, the expected concentration value for carbon monoxide would be 0.0285 PPM. For nitrogen oxides, the expected concentration value of 0.021 PPM, would be 1/4 the guideline value of 0.08 PPM for 24-hour exposure based on epidemiological studies of significant changes in the pulmonary function of asthmatics. The value for hydrocarbons, would be 0.0062 PPM. These values, determined from 240 flights/day, currently are below the levels responsible for significant health problems to the population. However, during certain meteorological conditions where the inversion layer “lid” is continuous for four days or longer and/or the El Toro airport use is expanded to more flights per day, the values for
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AAA, 1997. Automobile Club of Southern California, Orange County.
AQMD, 1997. Air Quality and Health Effects. Air Quality Management District.http://www.aand.gov/agmp/97draft/main/ch2/ch20618.html
Anonymous, 1998, LAX - JUST THE FACTS - Historical. (http://www.lawa.org/lax/html/chrono.htm)
Arrow Energy Inc. National Aviation Fuel Supplier, Saline, MI 48176, E-mail: arrow@arrowenergy.com
Brimblecombe, P., 1996. Air Composition and Chemistry. Second Edition. Cambridge Environmental Series, 6. Cambridge University Press 253p.
EPA, 1999. Evaluation of Air Pollutant Emissions from Subsonic Commercial Jet Aircraft. Engine Programs and Compliance Division, Office of Mobile Sources, final report U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA420-R-99–013, and Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 Arbor.
FAEED, 1999. FAA Aircraft Engine Emission User Guide and Database. Office of Environment and Energy, Federal Aviation Administration. Reference number AEE-110.
Fleagle, R.G. and Businger, J.A., 1963. An Introduction to Atmospheric Physics. Academic Press, New York and London, 346p.
Hamilton Aviation, 1996. Boeing 727–281–200 ADV Tri-Jet. Performance and Technical Specifications. http://www.hamiltonaviation.com/salelease/specs/B727ADV.htm
Hemond, H.F. and Fechner, E.J., 1994. Chemical Fate and Transport in the Environment. Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, CA, 338p.
IPCC, 1999. Aviation and the Global Atmosphere. A special report of the IPCC Working Groups I and III in collaboration with the Scientific Assessment Panel to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. WMO -World Meteorological Organization and UNEP -United Nations Environmental Program. Cambridge University Press. 373p.
NRDC,.1999. Airports Overlooked as Major Polluters. National Resources Defense Fund. http://www.nrdc.org/nrdc/find/trailpov.html
Purvis Brothers Inc, 1999. Aviation Civilian Turbine Fuel Specifications. http:/www.nauticom.net/www/macpjr/avturbospec.htm
Schell, W.R. 1999. Frequency of fog and other meteorological conditions observed and recorded from Monarch Summit II, Laguna Niguel, CA. Personal Scientific Notebook
Shareef, G.S., Butler, W.A., Bravo, L.A., and Stockton, M. B., 1988. Air emissions species manual Vol. 1:Volatile organic species compound (VOC) species profiles. Radian Corp.1988. EPA report. 450/2–88–003a.
Sorensen, L., Kilde. N., Rypdal, K., 1998. Emission Inventory Guidebook, 1998. Risoe Natl. Laboratory, Systems Analysis Department, Roskilde, Denmark, and Statistics Norway Oslo, Norway.
TEOC, 1999. The Environmental Organization, Copenhagen. - For protection of the environment around Copenhagen Airport 17p plus 5 Appendices; e-mail: beck a;idt.net., http://hudson.idt.net/beck/index-engelsk.htm
Williamson, S.J., 1973. Fundamentals of Air Pollution. Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, Menlo Part, CA, 472p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schell, W.R. (2001). Predictions of Aircraft Pollutants from Expanded Flight Operations at El Toro, Ca - a Public Health Issue?. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Assessment and Management of Environmental Risks. NATO Science Series, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0987-4_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0024-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0987-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive