Abstract
The question of time preoccupied philosophers already in Antiquity, and its interpretation in history has known several culminations. Strangely enough, time does not fall into any ontological category, for all of them depend on it. In fact, the various modes of existence (e.g., reality, ideality, fictive existence, absolute existence) are to be distinguished fundamen- tally by their relation to time, which their respective ontological structures indicate as being either necessary (real existence, which allows change and action) or inadmissible (ideal existence, which does not compass the possibility of change), etc. The question thus emerges — in virtue of what does time play such a basic role with respect to ontology?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See myAnna-Teresa Tymieniecka“The First Principles of the Metaphysics of Life,” in Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (ed.), Phenomenology of Man and of the Human Condition, Part II: The Meeting Point of Occidental and Oriental Philosophies, Analecta Husserliana 21 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press. 1986), pp. 373.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tymieniecka, AT. (2000). Chronos and Kairos: Ordering on the one Side and Radiating on the Other. In: Impetus and Equipoise in the Life-Strategies of Reason. Analecta Husserliana, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0946-1_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0946-1_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6731-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0946-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive