Advertisement

Deforestation and Agricultural Expansion in Mhonda area, Tanzania

  • Gerald Claudius Monela
  • Birger Solberg
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 2)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the possibilities for sustainable land use management at farm level in order to preserve the tropical rainforest in the Nguru mountains in Tanzania. Based on data collected in Mhonda area, a compromise programming model at household farm level was developed and used to analyze deforestation as a consequence of population growth, working capital availability, crop prices, fertilizer costs and risk aversion of the farmers. The study showed that existing farming systems can sustain the present population growth rate of 3.7% per year for only a maximum duration of between 10 and 15 years. Forest encroachment for agriculture is one main agent of deforestation pressure. Declining crop productivity and income under risk conditions, and growing food demand due to population growth are key driving forces for encroachment. The existing farm activities can be improved to reduce deforestation pressure by resource re-allocation and risk management in the short term and introducing more appropriate farming technology in the long term. Improving household economy is also crucial to raise farmer’s income, and improve land use practices to reduce deforestation pressure.

Keywords

Rainforest deforestation agriculture land use planning risks compromise programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boisvert, R.N. and McCarl B. 1990. Agricultural risk modeling using mathematical programming. Southern Cooperative Series, Bulletin 356.Google Scholar
  2. Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  3. Boserup, E. 1990. Economic and demographic relationships in development. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
  4. Brooke, A., Kendrick D. and Meeraus A. 1992. GAMS a user’s guide. Release 2.25.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, K. and Pearch D. (eds.) 1994. The causes of tropical deforestation. UCL Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Cohon, J.L. 1978. Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  7. Due, J.M., Anandajayasekeram P., Mdoe N.S. and White M. 1984. Beans in the farming system in Langau and Kibaoni villages, Mgeta area, Morogoro Region, Tanzania. Economic Research Bureau (ERB), University of Dar es Salaam. ERB Paper No. 84.2.Google Scholar
  8. FAO 1991. The impact of stabilization and structural adjustment policies on the rural sector. Case studies of Cote dTvore, Senegal, Liberia, Zambia and Morocco. FAO Economic and Social Development Paper 90. Pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbon, P., Havnevik, K.J. and Hermeie, K. (eds.) 1993. Blighted harvest? The World Bank and African agriculture in the 1980’s. James Currey Ltd. and Africa World Press, London/Trenton.Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, S. 1994. Dialogue: Ecological and economic requirements for sustainable landuse in sub-Saharan Africa. Some critical remarks to Jens B. Aune’s analysis and Aune’s clarifying remarks. Forum for Development Studies 1–2: 324–329.Google Scholar
  11. Hazell, P.B.R. 1971. A linear alternative to quadratic and semivariance programming for farm planning and uncertainty. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaoneka, A.R.S. 1993. Landuse planning and qualitative modeling in Tanzania with particular reference to agriculture and deforestation: Some theoretical aspects and a case study from the West Usambara Mountains. Doctoral Thesis. Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.Google Scholar
  13. Latham, M.C. 1979. Human nutrition in tropical Africa. FAO Food and Nutrition Series, No. 11. Rome.Google Scholar
  14. Monela, G.C. 1995. Tropical rainforest deforestation, biodiversity benefits and sustainable landuse: Analysis of economic and ecological aspects related to the Nguru Mountains, Tanzania. Doctoral Thesis 1995:27. Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.Google Scholar
  15. Norris, S.R.W. 1990. Using aerial photographs and GIS in quantifying deforestation of tropical rainforest: a case study from the Nguru mountains, Tanzania. M.Sc. Thesis, NORAGRIC. Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.Google Scholar
  16. Palo, M. and Mery, G. (eds.) 1990. Deforestation or development in the Third World? Vol. III. The Finnish Forestry Research Institute, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  17. Palo, M. and Mery, G. (eds.) 1996. Sustainable forestry challenges for developing countries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dortrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Romero, C, Amador, F. and Barco, A. 1987. Multiple objectives in agricultural planning: A compromise programming application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1987: 78–86.Google Scholar
  19. Sankhayan, PL. and Øygard, R. 1993. Effects of structural adjustments on income, employment, risk and environmental degradation in Indian agriculture: a study in the Punjab. Report for the Centre for Sustainable Development, ás, Norway.Google Scholar
  20. Sharma, N.P. (ed.) 1992. Managing the World’s forests: looking for balance between conservation and development. The World Bank. Vendal/Hunt Publication Co., Iowa.Google Scholar
  21. Tibaijuka, A.K. 1984. An economic analysis of small-holder banana-coffee farms in Kagera region, Tanzania: causes of decline in productivity and strategies for revitalization. Doctoral Thesis. Department of Economics and Statistics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  22. Zekri, S. and Romero, C. 1993. Public and private compromises in agricultural water management. Journal of Environmental Management 37: 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeleny, M. 1984. Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Claudius Monela
    • 1
  • Birger Solberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest Economics Faculty of Forestry and Nature ConservationSokoine University of AgricultureMorogoroTanzania
  2. 2.Institute of ForestryAgricultural University NLHÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations