A Distributed Hydrological Model of Flash-Floods

  • Enrica Caporali
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (ASEN2, volume 77)

Abstract

The flash-floods of small watersheds are characterized by a low predictability. The monitoring of these events is in fact very often problematic, due to the size of the phenomenon and to the lack or failure of appropriate real-time survey networks. Furthermore the forecasting potentiality is implicitly limited either by the fast response of the catchment area or the uncertainty in the description of the dynamic and spatial variability of rainfall fields and the hydrological soil properties. The relevance of physically based reconstruction of past events is therefore recognized and the increasing knowledge of the complex hydrological processes has stressed the need to analyze the phenomena at quite fine spatial resolution.

Two sub-models compose the distributed hydrological model described here. The first one describes the various soil and subsoil processes, which contribute to the total runoff by using the hydrological budget equation on a small-scale (≤1km)discretization or equispaced grid. Inside each grid-cell, considered as a unitary system, the internal variance is studied through a stochastic approach, which assumes locally stationary, in space, distribution functions of all the quantities involved. The water mass transfer among adjacent cells is considered on geomorphological basis. The second sub-model addresses the flood routing. To evaluate the first order dynamics of the flood event each stream-branch, considered as a group of cells, is modeled as a linear reservoir. The discharge to the control stream section is compiled, taking into account the hydraulic characteristics of the upstream branches. Different identification procedures of local precipitation dynamic and spatial structures have been experimented in the applications on three small watersheds located in Tuscany (Italy).

Keywords

Porosity Radar Sewage Geophysics Nash 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott, M. B., Bathurst, J. C., Cunge, J. A., O’Connel, P. E. and Rasmussen J. (1986) An introduction to the European Hydrologic System (Systeme Hydrologique European:“SHE”): History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed modeling systemJ. Hydrology 8745–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adler, R. F. and Negri, A. J. (1988) A Satellite Infrared Technique to Estimate Tropical Convective and Strati form RainfallJ. Climate Applied Meteorology27, 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Austin, M. (1987) Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfallMon. Wea. Rev.151380–1386.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldini, L., Facheris, L., Giuli, D., Caporali, E. and Palmisano, E. (1995) Analysis of radar and raingauge measurements for a critical meteorological event in TuscanySurveys in Geophysics 16253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becchi, I., and Bemporad, G. A. (1985) Small basin hydrology: Review of the absorptive phenomenonReportDIC 1/85, Firenze.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    .Becchi, I, and Giuli, D. (1986) The Arno Project: a real time approach to the Amo river flooding forecastInternational Conf on the Arno Project, TECNOPRINT, Bologna, CNR-GNDCI 29, 9-31. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becchi I. and Federici, G. (1986) Hydrological grid model for simulation of absorption phenomena.International Conf. on the Arno ProjectTECNOPRINT, Bologna, CNR-GNDCI 29, 199–221.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becchi, I., Castelli, F. and Federici, G. (1989) Data bases and geographic information systems: The river flood forecasting project, Report DIC 3/89, Firenze.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Becchi, I., Caporali, E., Castelli, F. and Settesoldi, D. (1991) Methods, standards and formats for data management in distributed hydrological modeling. Report DIC 5/91, Firenze.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Becchi, I., Caporali, E., and Palmisano, E. (1994) Hydrological response to radar rainfall maps through a distributed modelNatural Hazards9, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becchi, I., Caporali, E., Castellani, L., Palmisano, E. and Castelli, F. (1995) Hydrological control of flooding: Tuscany, October 1992Surveys in Geophysics16, 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. l2.
    Beven, K. (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically-based modelsJ. Hydrology105, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beven, K., and O’Connel, P. E. (1982) On the role of distributed models in hydrologyReport 81Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, U. K..Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caparrini, F., Caporali, E. and Profeti, G. (1998) Application of Landsat TM data to evaluate soil hydrological status in the Arno basin, Italy: preliminary results.European Symposium on Remote Sensing for Agriculture Ecosystems and HydrologySPIE Proceedings Series 3499, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castelli, F., Becchi, I., Caporali, E., Mazzanti, B., Castellani, L. (1997) Hydro-sedimentological analysis of the 96 Apuanian Alps flash-flood eventAnnales Geophysicae15(I), C237.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collier, G. (1986) Accurancy of rainfall estimate by radar, Part 1: Calibration by telemetering raingaugesJ. Hydrology77, 19–30.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fitzpatrick E.A. (1991)Soils their formation classification and distribution Longman.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grayson R. B., Moore, I.D. and McMahon, T.A. (1992) Physically based hydrologic modeling I. A Terrainn-based model for Investigative PurposesWater Resources Research28(10), 2639–2658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gupta, V. K., Waymire, E. and Wang, C. T. (1980) A representation of an instantaneous unit hydrograph from geomorphologyWater Resources Research16(5), 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall A. J. (1981)Flash Flood ForecastingWMO-n°577, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson D. L. and Muller, A.C. (1997) A spatially distributed hydrologic model utilizing raster data structures.Computers and Geosciences23(3), 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mancini F. (1966), Soil map of Italy: Soil Associations, AGAF A&R Senatori, Firenze.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olivera F. and Maidment, D. (1999) Geographic information systems (GIS)-based spatially distributed model for runoff routing.Water Resources Research35(4), 1155–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., and Valdes, J. B. (1979) The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic responseWater Resources Research15(6), 1409–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Gupta, V. K. and Waymire, E. (1984) Scale considerations in the modeling of temporal rainfallWater Resources Research20(2), 1611–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Eagleson P. S. (1987) Mathematical Models of Rainstorm Events in Space and TimeWater Resources Research23, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosso R. (1984) Nash model relation to Horton order ratiosWater Resources Research20 914–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosso R. (1994) An Introduction to spatially distributed modeling of basin response.International Workshop on Advances in Distributed Hydrology.Water Resources Publications 3–30.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seed, G. and Austin, L. (1990) Variability of summer Florida rainfall and its significance for the estimation of rainfall by gages, radar and satelliteJ. Geophysics Research95, 2207–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Seyfried, M.S. and Wilcox, B.P. (1995) Scale and nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling.Water Resources Research31(1), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Soil Conservation Service (1972)National Engineering Handbook: Hydrology,4Washington DC.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    WMO/UNESCO (1974) International Glossary of Hydrology, WMO-n°385, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wyss, E., Williams R. and Bras, R. L. (1990). Hydrological modeling of New England river basins using radar rainfall dataJ. Geophysics Research95, 2195–2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrica Caporali
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria CivileUniversito di FirenzeFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations