Skip to main content

Differences among rice cultivars in root exudation, methane oxidation, and populations of methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria in relation to methane emission

  • Chapter
Methane Emissions from Major Rice Ecosystems in Asia

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 91))

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted under subtropical conditions to understand the mechanism of rice cultivar differences in methane (CH4) emission. Three rice cultivars were studied. Differences in CH4 emission rates among the three rice cultivars became evident in the middle and late growth stages. Rice root exudates per plant measured as total released C were significantly different among rice cultivars. The effect of root exudates on CH4 production in soil slurry differed accordingly. The amount of root exudates was not significantly different among rice cultivars when computed on a dry matter basis, indicating that it is positively correlated to root dry matter production. The root CH4 -oxidizing activity differed among rice cultivars. 1R65598 had a higher oxidative activity than IR72 and Chiyonishiki. Root air space was not significantly different among rice cultivars at the late growth stage, indicating that it is probably not a factor contributing to cultivar differences in CH4 emission. The population level of methanogenic bacteria differed significantly in soil grown to different rice cultivars, but not in roots, at booting stage and ripening stage. Methanotrophic bacteria population differed significantly in roots among rice cultivars at ripening. Rice cultivars with few unproductive tillers, small root system, high root oxidative activity, and high harvest index are ideal for mitigating CH4 emission in rice fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adachi K, Oyediran G ; Senboku T (1996) Effect of application of rice straw and cellulose on methane emission and biological nitrogen fixation in a subtropical paddy field. Il Enumeration of populations of methanogenic bacteria by most probable number method and roll tube method. Soil Sci Plant Nun’ 42:713–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (1982) Most probable number method for microbial populations. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, pp 815–820,.ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelet D ; Neue HE (1993) Methane emissions from wetland rice areas of Asia. Chemosphere 26:219–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brink RH ir, Dubach P & Lynch DL (1960) Measurement of carbohydrates in soil hydrolyzates with anthrone. Soil Sci 89:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes BH, Austin ER & Tays BK (1995) Methane emissions from flooded soils and plants under controlled conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 27:331–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham DW, Korich DG, LeBlanc RP, Sinclair NA ; Arnold RG (1992) Application of a colorimetric plate assay for soluble methane monooxygenase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2231–2236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen CR, Luxmoor RG, van Gundy SD ; Stolzy LH (1969) Root airspace measurements by a pycnometer method. Agron J 61:474–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU (1993) Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience 43:466–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU (1997) Fluxes of methane from rice fields and po-tential for mitigation. Soil Use Manage 13:258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU, Wassmann R ; Lantin RS (1995) Mitigation options for methane emissions from rice fields. In: Peng S, Ingram KT, Neue HU, Ziska LH (eds) Climate Change and Rice, pp 136–144, Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neue HU, Wassmann R, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR ; Aduna JB (1994) Effect of rice cultivars on methane emission. Int. Rice Res News 19:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouchi I, Mariko S ; Aoki K (1990) Mechanism of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiol 94:59–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz H. Seiler W ; Conrad R (1989) Processes involved in formation and emission of methane in rice paddies. Biogeochemistry 7:33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takai Y (1970) The mechanism of methane fermentation in flooded paddy soil. Soil Sei Plant Nutr 16:238–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogels GD, Keltjens JT ; Van der Drift C (1988) Biochemistry of methane production. In: Zehuder AJB (ed) Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, pp 707–770, John Wiley ; Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Neue HU & Samonte HP (1997a) Effect of cultivar difference (`IR72’, 1R65598’ and `DulaR-1) on methane emission. Agrie Ecosyst Environ 62:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Neue HU ; Samonte HP (1997b) Role of rice in mediating methane emission. Plant Soil 189: 107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Neue HU, ; Samonte HP (1997e) Effect of rice plant on seasonal methane emission pattern. Acta Agron Sin 23:170–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Z, Guo Y, Shao K ; Chen Z (1999) Methane emissions from ricefields as affected by organic amendment, water regime, crop establishment, and rice cultivar. Environ Monitor Assess 57:213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I, Hashimoto T ; Shimoyama A (1997) Methane-oxidizing activities and methanotrophic populations associated with wetland rice plants. Biol Fertil Soils 24: 261–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yagi K, Tsuruta H ; Minami K (1997) Possible options for mitigating methane emission from rice cultivation. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 49:213–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH ; Gomez KA (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice, (3’ded), International Rice Research IInstitute, Manila, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Reiner Wassmann Rhoda S. Lantin Heinz-Ulrich Neue

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, B., Adachi, K. (2000). Differences among rice cultivars in root exudation, methane oxidation, and populations of methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria in relation to methane emission. In: Wassmann, R., Lantin, R.S., Neue, HU. (eds) Methane Emissions from Major Rice Ecosystems in Asia. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 91. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0898-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0898-3_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3812-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0898-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics