Quality Assurance in Environmental Modelling
The different view of scientists and decision makers in risk assessment, the gap between needs and opportunities, the increasing number of models and their wide application by practical users with different background make necessary to ensure the quality and performance of modelling.
For this reason, it is very important to have a clear description of the use and the limitation of the model and the input data useability as well as the assumption and suggestions applied in the risk assessment process. To comply with the general quality requirements a risk assessor should manage the questions of data needs, variability, uncertainties inherent to each component of risk assessment. Statement of working hypothesis and applied models that improve understanding of numerical risk estimates is essential.
KeywordsToxicity Dura Toxicology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Structure — activity relationships in toxicology and ecotoxicology (1986) ECETOC, Monographs No.8.Google Scholar
- 2.Risk Assistant for Windows 3.1 User’ s guide. Hampshire Research Institute, Inc. 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.EU TGD (1996) “Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commmission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notifield Substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances”, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
- 4.National Research Council (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Management the Process.Google Scholar
- 5.U.S. EPA (1992) Guidelines for Exposure Assessment 57 Federal Register, 22888–22938, May 29Google Scholar
- 6.DIN ISOIIEC (1995) 12119: 1995-08, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 7.Estimating environmental concentrations of chemicals using fate and exposure models (1992) ECETOC, Technical report No.50.Google Scholar