Advertisement

Quality Assurance in Environmental Modelling

  • Gyula Dura
  • Elizabeth Laszlo
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NAIV, volume 2)

Abstract

The different view of scientists and decision makers in risk assessment, the gap between needs and opportunities, the increasing number of models and their wide application by practical users with different background make necessary to ensure the quality and performance of modelling.

For this reason, it is very important to have a clear description of the use and the limitation of the model and the input data useability as well as the assumption and suggestions applied in the risk assessment process. To comply with the general quality requirements a risk assessor should manage the questions of data needs, variability, uncertainties inherent to each component of risk assessment. Statement of working hypothesis and applied models that improve understanding of numerical risk estimates is essential.

Keywords

Risk Assessment Risk Quotient Risk Characterisation Risk Assessment Process Technical Guidance Document 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Structure — activity relationships in toxicology and ecotoxicology (1986) ECETOC, Monographs No.8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Risk Assistant for Windows 3.1 User’ s guide. Hampshire Research Institute, Inc. 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EU TGD (1996) “Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commmission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notifield Substances and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances”, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Research Council (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Management the Process.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. EPA (1992) Guidelines for Exposure Assessment 57 Federal Register, 22888–22938, May 29Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DIN ISOIIEC (1995) 12119: 1995-08, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Estimating environmental concentrations of chemicals using fate and exposure models (1992) ECETOC, Technical report No.50.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz S., Berding V., Trapp S., Matthies M. (1998) Quality criteria for environmental risk assessment software. Using the example of EUSES. ESPR-Environ. Sci.& Pollut. Res. 5, 4. 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Portier C. J., Lyles C. M.( 1996) Practicing Safe Modeling: GLP For Biologically Based Mechanistic Models. Environ. Health Perspect. 104, 8. 806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gyula Dura
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Laszlo
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Environmental Health of “Fodor József”National Centre for Public HealthBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations