Skip to main content

The Impact of Organizational Features on Gang Activities and Relationships

  • Chapter
The Eurogang Paradox

Abstract

What are the key structural features of gangs? How do these organizational characteristics affect gang activities? Law enforcement (Fox and Amador, 1993), media sources, the popular press and some government agencies (Conly, 1993) support the view that gangs are well organized and that gang activities reflect this reality. From this perspective, gangs are perceived as highly organized, well-coordinated, and efficient organizations that function much like a corporation. From this view, gangs have clearly articulated goals, motivate well-disciplined members toward the achievement of these goals, and operate with financial efficiency and rationality. Over time, disorganized aggregations of predatory individuals evolve into formal-rational gangs that purposively engage in crimes motivated and organized by the gang. However, an alternative view argues that most gangs are not well organized, and that the behavior of gang members reflects their status as adolescents. This issue has important implications for both prevention and intervention, and it bears on a central question about the nature of criminal behavior. However, little empirical evidence addresses these questions. In this paper, I review the results of interviews with gangs in three different cities, differentiating between the structural characteristics and organizational features of gangs. The emphasis is primarily on organizational features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, P. (1985). Wheeling and Dealing. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. and D. Luckenbill (1994). Organizing Deviance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1972). Robbery. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conly, C. (1993). Street Gangs: Current Knowledge and Strategies. National Institute of Justice, Issues and Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, P., J. Olson, and D. Avery (1991). Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S.H. and B. Van Winkle (1995). Slinging dope: Drug sales and gangs. Justice Quarterly 11: 1001–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. H. and B. Van Winkle (1996). Life in the Gang: Family, Friends, and Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Einstadter, W. (1969). The social organization of robbery. Social Problems 64–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstadter, W. (1969). The social organization of robbery. Social Problems 64–83. Fagan, J. (1989). The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology 27: 633–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. (1992). Drug sales and work in the inner city. In A. Harrell and J. McCarthy (eds.), Drugs, Crime and Social Isolation. Urban Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher, M. (1999). Dead End Kids: Gang Girls and the Boys They Know. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. W. and M.E. Amador (1993). Gangs on the Move. Placerville, CA: Copperhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, J. (1988). People and Folks. Chicago: Lakeview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. R. (1996). The Criminal Behavior of Gang Members. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. (1972). The inmates perspective. In J.D. Douglas (ed.), Research on Deviance. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1995). The American Street Gang. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M., C. Maxson, and L. Cunningham (1991). Crack, street gangs, and violence. Criminology 29(4): 623–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxson, C. and M. Klein (1986). Street Gangs Selling Cocaine “Rock.” University of Southern California. Social Science Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxson, C., K. Woods, and M. Klein (1996). Street gang migration: How big a threat? Research in Action, National Institute of Justice Journal (February): 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxson, C, and M. Klein (1995). Investigating gang structures. Journal of Gang Research 3:33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, F. (1992). The Gang as an American Enterprise. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, S. (1994). Gangs in San Diego. Final Report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children and Families. San Diego Association of Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P., R. MacCoun and P. Murphy (1990). Money from Crime: A Study of the Economics of Drug Dealing. Santa Monica: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Jankowski, M. (1991). Islands in the Street. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W. (1994). Drive-bys and Gang Bangs. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J., T. Correl, E. Navarro, and R. Rabb (1988). The Social Structure of Street Drug Dealing. Sacramento: Office of the Attorney General of the State of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1990). Dangerous Society. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnel, K. (1995). Choosing Crime: The Criminal Calculus of Property Offenders. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldorf, D., C. Reinerman and S. Murphy (1996). Cocaine Changes. Philadelphia: Temple.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. and S.H. Decker (1994). Burglars on the Job. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. and S.H. Decker (1997). Armed Robbers in Action. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Decker, S.H. (2001). The Impact of Organizational Features on Gang Activities and Relationships. In: Klein, M.W., Kerner, HJ., Maxson, C.L., Weitekamp, E.G.M. (eds) The Eurogang Paradox. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0882-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0882-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6844-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0882-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics