Abstract
What are the key structural features of gangs? How do these organizational characteristics affect gang activities? Law enforcement (Fox and Amador, 1993), media sources, the popular press and some government agencies (Conly, 1993) support the view that gangs are well organized and that gang activities reflect this reality. From this perspective, gangs are perceived as highly organized, well-coordinated, and efficient organizations that function much like a corporation. From this view, gangs have clearly articulated goals, motivate well-disciplined members toward the achievement of these goals, and operate with financial efficiency and rationality. Over time, disorganized aggregations of predatory individuals evolve into formal-rational gangs that purposively engage in crimes motivated and organized by the gang. However, an alternative view argues that most gangs are not well organized, and that the behavior of gang members reflects their status as adolescents. This issue has important implications for both prevention and intervention, and it bears on a central question about the nature of criminal behavior. However, little empirical evidence addresses these questions. In this paper, I review the results of interviews with gangs in three different cities, differentiating between the structural characteristics and organizational features of gangs. The emphasis is primarily on organizational features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, P. (1985). Wheeling and Dealing. New York: Columbia University Press.
Best, J. and D. Luckenbill (1994). Organizing Deviance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Conklin, J. (1972). Robbery. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Conly, C. (1993). Street Gangs: Current Knowledge and Strategies. National Institute of Justice, Issues and Practices.
Cromwell, P., J. Olson, and D. Avery (1991). Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Decker, S.H. and B. Van Winkle (1995). Slinging dope: Drug sales and gangs. Justice Quarterly 11: 1001–1022.
Decker, S. H. and B. Van Winkle (1996). Life in the Gang: Family, Friends, and Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Einstadter, W. (1969). The social organization of robbery. Social Problems 64–83.
Einstadter, W. (1969). The social organization of robbery. Social Problems 64–83. Fagan, J. (1989). The social organization of drug use and drug dealing among urban gangs. Criminology 27: 633–669.
Fagan, J. (1992). Drug sales and work in the inner city. In A. Harrell and J. McCarthy (eds.), Drugs, Crime and Social Isolation. Urban Institute Press.
Fleisher, M. (1999). Dead End Kids: Gang Girls and the Boys They Know. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Fox, R. W. and M.E. Amador (1993). Gangs on the Move. Placerville, CA: Copperhouse.
Gottfredson, M. and T. Hirschi (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
Hagedorn, J. (1988). People and Folks. Chicago: Lakeview Press.
Huff, C. R. (1996). The Criminal Behavior of Gang Members. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice.
Irwin, J. (1972). The inmates perspective. In J.D. Douglas (ed.), Research on Deviance. New York: Random House.
Klein, M. (1995). The American Street Gang. New York: Oxford University Press.
Klein, M., C. Maxson, and L. Cunningham (1991). Crack, street gangs, and violence. Criminology 29(4): 623–650.
Maxson, C. and M. Klein (1986). Street Gangs Selling Cocaine “Rock.” University of Southern California. Social Science Research Center.
Maxson, C., K. Woods, and M. Klein (1996). Street gang migration: How big a threat? Research in Action, National Institute of Justice Journal (February): 26–31.
Maxson, C, and M. Klein (1995). Investigating gang structures. Journal of Gang Research 3:33–40.
Padilla, F. (1992). The Gang as an American Enterprise. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers.
Pennell, S. (1994). Gangs in San Diego. Final Report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children and Families. San Diego Association of Governments.
Reuter, P., R. MacCoun and P. Murphy (1990). Money from Crime: A Study of the Economics of Drug Dealing. Santa Monica: Rand.
Sanchez-Jankowski, M. (1991). Islands in the Street. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Sanders, W. (1994). Drive-bys and Gang Bangs. New York: Aldine.
Skolnick, J., T. Correl, E. Navarro, and R. Rabb (1988). The Social Structure of Street Drug Dealing. Sacramento: Office of the Attorney General of the State of California.
Taylor, C. (1990). Dangerous Society. Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Tunnel, K. (1995). Choosing Crime: The Criminal Calculus of Property Offenders. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Waldorf, D., C. Reinerman and S. Murphy (1996). Cocaine Changes. Philadelphia: Temple.
Wright, R. and S.H. Decker (1994). Burglars on the Job. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Wright, R. and S.H. Decker (1997). Armed Robbers in Action. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Decker, S.H. (2001). The Impact of Organizational Features on Gang Activities and Relationships. In: Klein, M.W., Kerner, HJ., Maxson, C.L., Weitekamp, E.G.M. (eds) The Eurogang Paradox. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0882-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0882-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6844-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0882-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive