Advertisement

Abstract

Animals fulfill their physiological needs by controlling behaviorally the inflow and outflow of energy they exchange with their environment. Such a control is achieved with the information provided by sensations aroused by the afferent messages that reach the brain. The sensations are quadri-dimensional (Fig. 1). The first dimension is duration. The second dimension, qualitative, describes the nature of the stimulus. The third, quantitative, describes the intensity of the stimulus. The fourth is affective. Let us examine this last dimension.

Keywords

Affective Dimension Affective Experience Common Currency Palatable Food Sensory Pleasure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attia, M. (1984). Thermal pleasantness and temperature regulation in man. Neuroscience Bio behavioural Review 8:335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cabanac, M. (1969). Plaisir ou déplaisir de la sensation thermique et homéothermie. Physiology and Behaviour 4:359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science 173:1103–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabanac, M. (1986). Performance and perception at various combinations of treadmill speed and slope. Physiology and Behaviour 38:839–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabanac, M. (1989). La maximisation du plaisir, réponse à un conflit de motivations. CR Academy of Sciences Paris 309 III, 397–402.Google Scholar
  6. Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: the common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology 155:173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabanac, M. , B. Massonnet, & R. Belaiche (1972). Preferred hand temperature as a function of internal and mean skin temperatures. Journal of Applied Physiology 33:699–703.Google Scholar
  8. Dean, J. (1994). Thoughts towards a characterization of prerational intelligence. In H. Cruse, J. Dean, & H. Ritter (eds. ),Emergence of prerational intelligence in biology: From sensorimotor intelligence to collective behavior (Program pp. 1–3). Bielefeld: Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Forschung, Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  9. Durrant, M. L. (1981). The effect of increasing the relative cost of palatable food on energy intake of obese subjects. International Journal of Obesity 5:380–381.Google Scholar
  10. Durrant, M. L. , & J. S. Garrow (1982). The effect of increasing the relative cost of palatable food with respect to ordinary food on total energy intake of eight obese in-patients. International Journal of Obesity 6:153–154.Google Scholar
  11. Einhorn, H.J. , & R. M. Hogarth (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Process of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 32:53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fantino, M. (1984). Role of sensory input in the control of food intake. Journal of the Autonomous Nervous System 10:326–347.Google Scholar
  13. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reiforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 4:267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahneman, D. , & A. Tversky (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39:341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lappalainen, R. , & L. H. Epstein (1990). A behavioral economics analysis of food choice in humans. Appetite 14:81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McFarland, D. J. , & R. M. Sibly (1975). The behavioural final common path.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Biology,270:265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNamara, J. M. , & A. I. Houston (1986). The common currency for behavioural decisions. American Naturalist 127:358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rachlin, H. , A. W. Logue, J. Gibbon, & M. Fraenkel (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review 93:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tversky, A. , & D. Kahneman (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59, S251–S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Young, P. T. , & K. R. Christensen (1962). Algebraic summation of hedonic process. Journal of Comparative Psychological Psychology 55:332–3336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michel Cabanac
    • 1
  1. 1.Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations