Advertisement

Abstract

Intelligence, for the purpose of the present discussion, will be defined as the ability to solve complex problems. In addition, the attribute “intelligent” is taken to indicate something about the speed and sophistication of problem solving. Thus, intelligence is most evident in dealing with problems that are new in the sense that they have not been encountered before in precisely the same form, so the solution requires more than simply repeating a previous set of actions. Brute force methods relying on exhaustive searches of all possible solutions, on the one hand, and applications of a simple rule, on the other hand, are not apt to be considered intelligent, although both may be highly successful in dealing with new problems. Of course, what is new and what rules are considered to be simple depend very much on the standpoint of the observer: intelligence may often mean recognizing that a new problem is simply a variant of previously solved problems. An experienced mathematician may immediately see promising routes to solutions for problems where a novice must resort to trial and error. Important correlates of intelligence are avoiding repetition of unsuccessful actions and, at a higher level, incorporating experience in order to modify and improve competence.

Keywords

Stick Insect Swing Movement Brute Force Method Wave Gait Tripod Gait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bässler, U. (1983). Neural basis of elementary behavior in stick insects. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bässler, U. (1993). The walking- (and searching-) pattern generator of stick insects, a modular system composed of reflex chains and endogenous oscillators. Biological Cybernetics 69, 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, T.G. (1911). The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 84, 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunn, D.E. (1993). Die Messung der Position des Mittelbeintarsus durch interseg-mentale und lokale Interneurone im Metathorax der Stabheuschrecke Carau-sius morosus. Bielefeld, Germany: PhD Thesis, Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  5. Brunn, D.E., & J. Dean (1994). Intersegmental and local interneurons in the metathorax of the stick insect, Carausius morosus, which monitor middle leg position. Journal of Neurophysiology 72, 1208–1219.Google Scholar
  6. Büschges, A., J. Schmitz, & U. Bässler (1995). Rhythmic patterns in the thoracic nerve cord of the stick insect induced by pilocarpine. Journal of Experimental Biology 198, 435–456.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, A.H., S. Grillner, & S. Rossignol (eds.), (1988). Neural control of rhythmic movements in vertebrates. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  8. Cruse, H. (1976). The control of body position in the stick insect (Carausius morosus), when walking over uneven surfaces. Biological Cybernetics 24, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruse, H. (1979). The control of the anterior extreme position of the hindleg of a walking insect, Carausius morosus. Physiological Entomology 4, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cruse, H. (1980). A quantitative model of walking incorporating central and peripheral influences. I. The control of the individual leg. Biological Cybernetics 37, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruse, H. (1985). Coactivating influences between neighbouring legs in walking insects. Journal of Experimental Biology 114, 513–319.Google Scholar
  12. Cruse, H. (1990). What mechanisms coordinate leg movement in walking arthropods? Trends in Neurosciences 13, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruse, H., Ch. Bartling, J. Dean, T. Kindermann, J. Schmitz, M. Schumm, & H. Wagner (1996). Coordination in a six-legged walking system. Simple solutions to complex problems by exploitation of physical properties. In R Maes, M.J. Mataric, J.-A. Meyer, J. Pollack, & S.W. Wilson (eds.), From animals to ani-mats 4 (pp. 84–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dean, J. (1991a). Effect of load on leg movement and step coordination of the stick insect Carausius morosus. Journal of Experimental Biology 159, 449–471.Google Scholar
  15. Dean, J. (1991b). A model of leg coordination in the stick insect, Carausius morosus. II. Description of the kinematic model and simulation of normal step patterns. Biological Cybernetics 64, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dean, J. (1992). A model of leg coordination in the stick insect, Carausius morosus. III. Responses to perturbations of normal coordination. Biological Cybernetics 66, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dean, J., & H. Cruse (1986). Evidence for the control of velocity as well as position in leg protraction and retraction by the stick insect. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns. Experimental Brain Research Series 15 (pp. 263–274). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dean, J., & G. Wendler (1982). Stick insects walking on a wheel: Perturbations induced by obstruction of leg protraction. Journal of Comparative Physiology 148, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delcomyn, F. (1980). Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals. Science 210, 492–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donner, M.D. (1984). Control of walking: local control and real time systems. PhD Thesis. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, D. (1979). Effects of circum-oesophageal lesion on the behaviour of the stick insect Carausius morosus. II. Changes in walking co-ordination. Biological Cybernetics 32, 147–152.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, D. (1981). Walking kinetics of the stick insect using a low-inertia counterbalanced, pair of independent tread-wheels. Biological Cybernetics 40, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGhee, R.B., S.S. & Sun (1974). On the problem of selecting a gait for a legged vehicle. Proceedings of the IV IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Space (pp. 53–62). Pittsburgh, PA, and Moscow: IFAC.Google Scholar
  24. Rychebusch, S., & G. Laurent (1993). Rhythmic patterns evoked in locust leg motor neurons by the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine. Journal of Neurophysiology 69, 1583–1595.Google Scholar
  25. Schmitz, J., & G. Haßfeld (1989). The treading-on-tarsus reflex in stick insects: Phase-dependence and modifications of the motor output during walking. Journal of Experimental Biology 143, 373–388.Google Scholar
  26. Selverston, A.I. (ed.), (1985). Model neural networks and behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  27. Weiland, G., & U.T. Koch (1987). Sensory feedback during active movements of stick insects. Journal of Experimental Biology 133, 137–156.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, D.M. (1967). An approach to the problem of control of rhythmic behavior. In C.A.G. Wiersma (ed.), Invertebrate nervous systems (pp. 219–229). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Dean
    • 1
  1. 1.Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations