Skip to main content

Designing for Interest and Novelty

Motivating Design Agents

  • Conference paper
Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the motivation of design agents to promote the exploration of design spaces. A general form of motivation common to designers is a curiosity to discover interesting designs. This paper presents computational models of interest and curiosity based on the detection of novelty. We illustrate the behaviour of our model of interest by developing a design agent that is motivated to explore the effects of emergent crowd behaviours on the performance of doorways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berlyne, D. E., 1971, Aesthetics and Psychobiology, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damski, J. C. and Gero, J. S., 1996, “A logic-based framework for shape representation”, Computer-Aided Design, 28(3): 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, E. and Soufi, B., 1992, “The computational modelling of emergent shapes in design”, in: Gero and Sudweeks, (eds.), Computational Models of Creative Design, The Key Centre of Design Computing, The University of Sydney, Sydney, p. 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaver, W. W. and Mandler, G., 1987, “Play it again, Sam: On liking music”, Cognition and Emotion, 1(3): 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S., 1994a, “Computational models of creative design processes”, in: Dartnall (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Creativity, Kluwer, Dordrecht, p. 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S., 1994b, “Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design”, in: Gero and Tyugu (eds.), Formal Design Methods for Computer-Aided Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S. and Jun, H. J., 1995, “Visual semantics emergence to support creative designing: a computational view”, in: Gero, Maher, and Sudweeks (eds.), Preprints Computational Models of Creative Design, Key Centre of Design Computing, The University of Sydney, Sydney, p. 87–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S. and Saunders, R., 2000, “Constructed representations and their functions in computational models of designing”, in: Tang, Tan and Wong (eds.), CAADRIA 2000, CASA, Singapore, p. 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S. and Yan, M., 1993, “Discovering emergent shapes using a data-driven symbolic model”, in: Flemming and Van Wyk, (eds.), CAAD Futures’ 93, North Holland, Amsterdam, p. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D., 1991, “A mathematical model for the behavior of pedestrians”, Behavioral Science, 36:298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. and Molnár, P., 1995, “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics”, Physical Review E, 51:4282–4286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. and Molnár, P., 1997, “Self-organization phenomena in pedestrian crowds”, in: Schweitzer (ed.) Self-Organization of Complex Structures: From Individual to Collective Dynamics, Gordon and Breach, London, p. 569–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T., 1993, Self Organization and Associative Memory, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y-T., 1993, “A connectionist approach to shape recognition and transformation”, in: Flemming and Van Wyk, (eds), CAAD Futures’ 93, North Holland, Amsterdam, p. 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, M. D., Stonor, T. and Penn, A., 1998, “Passengers, pedestrians and shoppers: Space syntax in design”, Passenger Terminal World, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsland, S., Nehmzow, U. and Shapiro, J., 2000, “A real-time novelty detector for a mobile robot”, in Proceedings of EUREL European Advanced Robotics Systems Conference, Salford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C., 1990, The Clockwork Muse, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. J., 1993, “A computational view of design creativity”, in: Gero and Maher (eds.) Modelling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design, Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, T. A. and Gero, J. S., 1992, “Effects of examples on the results of a design activity”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1): 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. and Wiggins, G., 1992, “Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing”, Design Studies, 13: 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber, J., 1991, “A possibility for implementing curiosity and boredom in model-building neural controllers”, in: Meyer and Wilson (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA, p. 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber, J., 1997, “What’s interesting?” Technical Report TR-35-97, IDSIA, Lugano, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., Gero, J. S. and Purcell, T., 1999, “Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: A key to creative designs”, in Gero and Maher (eds.), Computational Models of Creative Design IV, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, The University of Sydney, Sydney, p. 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarassenko, L., Hayton, P., Cerneaz, N. and Brady, M., 1995, “Novelty detection for the identification of masses in mammograms”, in: Fourth International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Cambridge, p. 442–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. and Gero, J. S., 1997, “Emergent shape generation via the boundary contour system”, in: Junge (ed.), CAAD Futures 1997, Kluwer, Dordrecht, p. 865–874.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, A. and Wiltshire, J., 1982, “Design training and aesthetic evaluation: An intergroup comparison”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden. K., 1997, “Structural fault detection using a novelty measure”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 201(1): 85–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Pierce, T. and Carbonell, J. G., 1998, “A study on retrospective and on-line event detection”, Proceedings ofACMSIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’98), p. 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saunders, R., Gero, J.S. (2001). Designing for Interest and Novelty. In: de Vries, B., van Leeuwen, J., Achten, H. (eds) Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2001. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0868-6_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0868-6_54

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3843-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0868-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics