Abstract
The three headings that we specified above, however, are still quite ambiguous; due to the abundant obscurity of the terms 20 employed they require further distinction and clarification. First, we recognize that we must not overlook a certain distinction where the term speech or language is concerned. We distinguish the articulated word, speech that is spoken at present taken as a sensuous phenomenon, especially as an acoustical phenomenon, 25 from the word and proposition itself or from a string of propositions itself making up a larger discourse. It is for good reason that we speak precisely of a repetition of the same words and sentences in the event we are not understood, repeating [what we have said]. In a treatise, in a novel, every word, every sentence 30 is singularly unique, and it cannot be duplicated by a repeated reading, be it aloud or to oneself. Indeed, in this case it is not a matter of who reads it: each one having his own voice, intonation, etc. We distinguish not only the treatise itself (taken here in merely a grammatical sense of a composition of words and 35 language) from the manifolds of uttered reproductions, but likewise from the manifold documentations that endure on paper
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Husserl, E. (2001). The Ideality of Linguistic Phenomena. In: Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Edmund Husserl Collected Works, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0846-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0846-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7066-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0846-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive