Making Sense of Mathematics Teacher Education pp 207-231 | Cite as

# An Approach for Supporting Teachers’ Learning in Social Context

## Abstract

Our purpose in this chapter is to outline a general approach to collaborating with teachers in order to support the establishment of a professional teaching community. As will become apparent, our goal is to help teachers develop instructional practices in which they induct their students into the ways of reasoning of the discipline by building systematically on their current mathematical activity. We develop the rationale for the approach we propose by describing how our thinking about in-service teacher development has evolved over the last thirteen years or so. To this end, we first revisit work conducted in collaboration with Erna Yackel and Terry Wood between 1986 and 1992 in which we supported the development of American second- and third-grade teachers. In doing so, we tease out aspects of the approach we took that still appear viable and discuss two major lessons that we learned. In the next section of the chapter, we draw on a series of teaching experiments we have conducted over the past seven years in American elementary and middle-school classrooms both to critique our prior work and to develop three further aspects of the approach we propose. We conclude by highlighting broad features of the approach and by locating them in institutional context.

### Keywords

Stein Arena Kelly Metaphor Lester## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?
*Educational Researcher*,*25*(9), 6–8, 14.Google Scholar - Barnett, C. (1991). Building a case-based curriculum to enhance the pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics teachers.
*Journal of Teacher Education*.*42*(4), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barron, L.C. & Goldman, E.S. (1994). Integrating technology with teacher preparation. In B. Means (Ed.),
*Technology and Education Reform*. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar - Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In T. Cooney & D. Grouws (Eds.),
*Effective mathematics teaching*(pp. 27–46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Bishop, A. (1985). The social construction of meaning—a significant development for mathematics education?
*For the Learning of Mathematics*,*5*(1), 24–28.Google Scholar - Bowers, J., Barron, L., & Goldman, E. (1994). An interactive media environment to enhance mathematics teacher education. In J. Willis, B. Robin & D.A. Willis (Eds.),
*Technology and Teacher Education Annual*(515–519). Washington, DC: Society for Technology and Teacher Education.Google Scholar - Bowers, J. & Nickerson, S. (1998, April). Documenting the development of a collective conceptual orientation in a college-level mathematics course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, T., & Fennema, E. (1992). Cognitively guided instruction: Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. In W. Secada (Ed.), Curriculum reform: The case of mathematics in the United States. Special issue of
*International Journal of Educational Research*(pp. 457–470). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, Inc.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999, May).
*Supporting teachers’ learning in social and institutional context*. Paper presented at the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education, Teipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar - Cobb, P. & Steffe, L.P. (1983). The constructivist researcher as teacher and model builder.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*14*, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (in press). Participating in classroom mathematical practices.
*Journal of the Learning Sciences*.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In N. Minick, E. Forman, & A. Stone (Eds.),
*Education and mind: Institutional, social, and developmental processes*(pp. 91–119). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis.
*American Educational Research Journal*,*29*, 573–602.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second grade mathematics project.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*22*, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & Perlwitz (1992). A follow-up assessment of a second-grade problem-centered mathematics project.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*23*, 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research.
*Educational Psychologist*,*31*, 175–190.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while doing mathematical problem solving. In D.B. McCleod & V.M. Adams (Eds.),
*Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective*(pp. 117–148). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1991). Curriculum and teacher development: Psychological and anthropological perspectives. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter, & S. J. Lamon (Eds),
*Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics*(pp. 83–120). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar - Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.
*Educational Researcher*,*19*(6), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997).
*The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Cohen, D.K., & Hill, H.C. (1998).
*Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California*. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar - Cole, M. (1996).
*Cultural psychology*. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Confrey, J. (1990). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches, and social constructivism? In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),
*Constructivism in education*. (pp. 185–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Dillon, D. R. (1993). The wider social context of innovation in mathematics education. In T. Wood, P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & D. Dillon (Eds.),
*Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues*. (pp. 71–96.) Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Engestrom, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In F. Seeger, J. Voight & U. Waschescio (Eds.),
*The culture of the mathematics classroom*(pp. 76–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.),
*The handbook of research on teaching*(3rd. ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Fennema, E., Carpenter, T.P., Franke, M.L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V.R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*27*, 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Carey, D. A. (1993). Using children’s mathematical knowledge in instruction.
*American Educational Research Journal*, 30, 555–583.Google Scholar - Franke, M.L., Carpenter, T.P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (1998, April).
*Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of teachers’ professional development in mathematics*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.Google Scholar - Franke, M.L., & Kazemi, E. (in press). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.),
*Beyond classical pedagogy in elementaiy mathematics: The nature of facilitative teaching. Mahwah*, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Gamoran, A., Secada, W.G., & Marrett, C.B. (in press). The organizational context of teaching and learning: Changing theoretical perspectives. In M.T. Hallinan (Ed.),
*Handbook of sociology*.Google Scholar - Gearhart, M, Saxe, G. B., Seltzer, M. Schlackman, J., Fall, R., Ching, C. C., Nasir, N., Bennett, T., Rhine, S., & Sloan, T. (1999). When can educational reforms make a difference? Opportunities to learn fractions in elementary mathematics classrooms.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*30*, 206–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goodlad, J.I. (1983).
*A place called school*. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K. E. P. (1994).
*Developing realistic mathematics education*. Utrecht, Netherlands: CD-β Press.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Educational development and developmental research.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*25*(5), 443–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1992). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second grade arithmetic.
*American Educational Research Journal*.*30*,(2), 393–425.Google Scholar - Jackson, P. (1968).
*Life in Classrooms*. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar - Kaput, J. J. (1987).
*The body in the mind: The bodily basis of reason and imagination*. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar - Knapp, N.F., & Peterson, P. L. (1995.) Teachers’ interpretations of “CGI” after four years: Meanings and practices.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*26*, 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching.
*American Educational Research Journal*,*27*(1), 29–63.Google Scholar - Lampert, M. & Ball, D. (1990).
*Using hypermedia to support a new pedagogy of teacher education*. Issue Paper 90-5. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.Google Scholar - Lazerson, M., McLaughlin, J. B., McPherson, B., & Bailey, S. K. (1985). New curriculum, old issues. In
*An education of value: The purpose and practices of schools*, (pp. 23–46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998, April).
*Developing a community of practice for reform of mathematics and science*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar - Lehrer, R., & Shumow, L. (1997). Aligning the construction zones of parents and teachers for mathematics reform.
*Cognition and instruction*,*15*(1), 41–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leont’ev, A. N. (1978).
*Activity, consciousness, and personality*. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar - Lesh, R. & Akerstrom, M. (1982). Applied problem solving: Priorities for mathematics education research. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.),
*Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research*. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.Google Scholar - Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform.
*Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis*,*15*, 129–151.Google Scholar - McClain, K. & Cobb, P. (1995, April).
*An analysis of the teacher’s proactive role in initiating and guiding the development of productive mathematical discourse*. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar - McClain, K. & Cobb, P. (1998). The role of imagery and discourse in supporting students’ mathematical development. In M. Lampert (Ed.)
*Mathematical talk and school learning: Where, what, and how*(pp. 56–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989).
*Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991).
*Professional standards for teaching mathematics*. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar - Newman & Associates (Eds.). (1996).
*Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality*. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar - O’Connor, M.C. & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.),
*Discourse, Learning, and Schooling*(pp. 63–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pirie, S. & Kieren, T. (1989). A recursive theory of mathematical understanding.
*For the learning of mathematics*,*9*(3), pp. 7–11.Google Scholar - Price, J. N. & Ball, D. L. (1997). ‘There’s always another agenda’: Marshaling resources for mathematics reform.
*Journal of Curriculum Studies*,*29*(6), 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schifter, D. (1990). Mathematics process as mathematics content: A course for teachers. In G. Booker, P. Cobb, & T. deMendicuti (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 14 annual meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 191–198). Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar - Schifter, D., & Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education: Stories of teachers meeting the challenge of reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, M.A. (in press). Research in mathematics teacher development: The teacher development experiment. In R. Lesh & E. Kelly (Eds.)
*New Methodologies in Mathematics and Science Education*. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Simon, M. A. (1993). Context for change: Themes related to mathematical education reform. In T. Wood, P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & D. Dillon (Eds.),
*Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues*. (pp. 109–114.) Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No. 6. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Simon, M.A. & Blume, G.W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*,*15*, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*26*, 114–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Simon, M. A., & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*22*, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steffe, L. P. (1983). The teaching experiment methodology in a constructivist research program. In M. Zweng, T. Green, J. Kilpatrick, H. Pollak, & M. Suydam (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education*(pp. 469–471). Boston: Birkhauser.Google Scholar - Stein, M.K. & Brown, CA. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative and institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.),
*Mathematics teachers in transition*(pp. 155–192). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Stein, M.K., Silver, E.A., & Smith, M.S. (1998). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.),
*Thinking practices: A symposium on mathematics and science learning*(pp. 17–52). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Stigler, J.W., & Hiebert, J. (1999).
*The teaching gap*. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar - Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988).
*Rousing minds to life*. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*, (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Thompson, A. G., & Thompson, P. W. (1996). Talking about rates conceptually, part II: Mathematical knowledge for teaching.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*27*, 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In
*1994 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics*(pp. 79–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1994). Talking about rates conceptually, part I: A teacher’s struggle.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*25*, 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (1992). Notations, principles, and constraints: Contributions to the effective use of concrete manipulatives in elementary education.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*23*, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Thompson, P. W. (1996). Imagery and the development of mathematical reasoning. In L. P. Steffe, B. Greer, P. Nesher, & G. Goldin (Eds.),
*Theories of learning mathematics*. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 167–184.Google Scholar - Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991).
*The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience*. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar - Voigt, J. (1985). Patterns and routines in classroom interaction.
*Recherches en Didactique des Mathematiques*,*6*, 69–118.Google Scholar - Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1995). Equity in the future tense: Redefining relationships among teachers, students, and science in linguistic minority classrooms. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. Byrd (Eds.),
*New directions in equity for mathematics education*. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Wenger, E. (1998).
*Communities of practice*. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar - Wood, T., & Sellers, P. (1996.) Assessment of a problem-centered mathematics program: Third grade.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*27*, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*27*, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar