Advertisement

Surface Diffusion Near Phase Transitions

  • F. Nieto
  • A. Tarasenko
  • C. Uebing
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry book series (NAII, volume 29)

Abstract

In this contribution, recent progresses in the understanding of surface diffusion processes within adsorbed monolayers will be reviewed. We will focus on the influence of phase transitions within the adsorbed monolayers. In most of the studies to be discussed below, lattice gas models have been used to a large extent. Unfortunately, in many cases even lattice gas models are too complicated for exact analytical treatments of the diffusion problem, especially if ad-ad interactions are taken into consideration, and only in some exceptional cases general equations for the description of surface diffusion can be derived. However, Monte Carlo simulations can easily be utilized to analyze surface diffusion processes. In recent years, the widespread availability of extremely powerful supermassive parallel computers has allowed many interesting studies on this topic. It is likely that the more recent work reviewed here will stimulate further work in this and related fields. The main emphasis of this article is on transport phenomena at or near equilibrium, i.e., on diffusion of particles within (nearly) equilibrated adsorbed monolayers on homogeneous surfaces.

Keywords

Monte Carlo Surface Diffusion Adsorbed Monolayer Tracer Diffusion Continuous Phase Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V.P. Zhdanov, Surf. Sci. 214, 289 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.J. Lombardo and A.T. Bell, Surf. Sci. Rep. 13, 1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Wahnstrom and V.P. Zhdanov, Surf. Sci. 247, 24 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.D. Dobbs and D.J. Doren, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 3722 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Cohen and Y. Zeiri, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1531 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Utrera and R. Ramirez, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 7838 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.E. Sanders and A.E. DePristo, Surf. Sci. 260, 116 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.M. Lynden-Bell, Surf. Sci. 259, 129 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.R. Mattsson, U. Engberg, and G. Wahnstrom, Phys. Rev. Let. 71, 2615 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Pai and D. Dore, Surf. Sci. 291, 185 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Blandin and C. Massobrio, Surf. Sci. 279, L219 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Ellis and J.P. Toennies, Surf. Sci. 317, 99 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. de Jong and A.P.J. Jansen, Surf. Sci. 317, 1 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.A. Gravil and S. Holloway, Surf. Sci. 310, 267 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lichang Wang, Qingfeng Ge, and G.D. Billing, Surf. Sci. 304, L413 (1994).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.D. Dobbs and D.J. Doren, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 10041 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    I.I. Suni and E.G. Seebauer, Surf. Sci. 301, L235 (1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.A. Evangelakis and N.I. Papanicolaou, Surf. Sci. 347, 376 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Boisvert and L.J. Lewis, Phys. Rev. B 54, 2880 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.F. Voter, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 4665 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.L. Riccardo and W.A. Steele, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9674 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Uebing and R. Gomer, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7626, 7636, 7641, 7648 (1991).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Tringides and R. Gomer, Surf. Sci. 166, 419 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Kehr and K. Binder, in Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, Vol. 36 of Topics in Current Physics, 2 ed., edited by K. Binder (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987), p. 181.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Tringides and R. Gomer, Surf. Sci. 145, 121 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Uebing and R. Gomer, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 7759 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R. Gomer, Surf. Sci. 38, 373 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. Mazenko, J.R. Banavar, and R. Gomer, Surf. Sci. 107, 459 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D.A. Reed and G. Ehrlich, Surf. Sci. 105, 603 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Gomer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 917 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. Bowker and D.A. King, Surf. Sci. 71, 583 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.A. Reed and G. Ehrlich, Surf. Sci. 102, 588 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A.A. Chumak and A.A. Tarasenko, Surf. Sci. 91, 694 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A.A. Tarasenko, P.M. Tomchuk, and A.A. Chumak, Fluctuations in the bulk and on the surface of solids (Naukova dumka, Kijv, 1992), (in Russian).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A.A. Tarasenko and A.A. Chumak, Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 24, 2972 (1982); 22, 2939 (1980), [Sov. Phys. Solid State 24, 1683 (1982); 22, 1716 (1980)].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A.A. Tarasenko and A.A. Chumak, Poverkhnost’ Fiyika, Khimija, Mekhanika 12, 37 (1991); 11, 98 (1989), (in Russian).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.V. Myshlyavtsev, A.P. Stepanov, C. Uebing, and V.P. Zhdanov, Phys. Rev. B 52, 5977 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    V.P. Zhdanov, Phys. Lett. A 161, 556 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    A.A. Chumak and A.A. Tarasenko, Surf. Sci. 364, 424 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    W. Zwerger, Z. Phys. B 42, 333 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    V.P. Zhdanov, Elementary Physicochemical Processes on Solid Surfaces (Plenum, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. Tarasenko, L. Jastrabik, F. Nieto, and C. Uebing, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8252 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    V.P. Zhdanov and C. Uebing, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 3197 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    I. Vattulainen, J. Merikoski, T. Ala-Nissila, and S.C. Ying, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 257 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    C. Uebing and V.P. Zhdanov, Phys. Rev. Let. 80, 5455 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    C. Uebing and R. Gomer, Surf. Sci. 331-333, 930 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Nieto
    • 1
  • A. Tarasenko
    • 2
  • C. Uebing
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de Física and Centro Latinoamericano de Estudios Ilya PrigogineUniversidad Nacional de San LuisSan LuisArgentina
  2. 2.Institute of PhysicsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyiv 28Ukraine
  3. 3.Department of Physics and AstronomyRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations