Abstract
Earthquakes and other natural hazards can create disasters of uncontrollable magnitudes when they hit large metropolitan areas. Losses from catastrophes are increasing due to higher concentrations of people and value in catastrophe-prone areas, and vulnerability of infrastructure. From 1994 to 1999, several earthquakes caused financial losses in excess of US$10 billion, including Northridge Earthquake, Los Angeles, 1994, Great Hanshin Earthquake, Kobe, 1995, the Kocaeli Earthquake, Turkey, 1999, and the Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan 1999. According to a World Bank publication, over 100,000 people died as a result of natural and technological disasters in 1999, with economic costs exceeding US$65 billion worldwide (Cameron, 2000). In developing countries, most of the economic loss falls under the burden of the Government, which has to divert precious development and public services funds into the recovery and reconstruction process. Business owners and homeowners, who are victims of disasters, often rely on disaster assistance help from government to rebuild their source of income and houses because they generally do not carry earthquake insurance. Insurance penetration in emerging economies is a fraction of that of developed countries, and plays a minimum role in protecting the economies and welfare of developing countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ambraseys, N.N. and JJ. Bommer. 1995. “Attenuation Relations for Use in Europe: An Overview.” In European Seismic Design Practice, edited by Elnaishai, Rotterdam: Balkema Publications.
Applied Technology Council. 1985. Earthquake Damage Data for California (ATC-13). Redwood City, CA.
Barka, A.A. 1988. “Strike-Slip Fault Geometry and its Influence on Earthquake Activity.” Tectonics, Vol. 7, No. 3: 663–684.
Bendimerad, F. 2000. “Megacities–Megarisk.” In Managing Risk. A Special Report on Disaster Risk Management”, Provention Consortium, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Borcherdt, R.D. 1994. “New Developments in Estimating Site Effects on Ground Motion.” ATC-35-1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
Cameron, A., 2000. “Better than a Cure.” In Managing Risk. A Special Report on Disaster Risk Management.” Provention Consortium, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Canabarro, E., M. Finkemeier, R. Anderson, and F. Bendimerad. 2000. “Analyzing Insurance-Linked Securities.” Journal of Risk Finance Vol. 1, No.2, N.Y. (Also in Financing Risk and Reinsurance, Sept. 1999. International Risk Management Institute, Dallas, TX.)
Carter, R.L., L. Lucas, and N. Ralph. 2000. Reinsurance. Reactions, London.
Cornell, C.A. and S. Winterstein. 1988. “Temporal and Magnitude Dependence in Earthquake Recurrence Models.” BSSA, Vol. 78.
Cornell, C.A., 1968. “Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis”, BSSA, Vol. 58.
Erdik, M., V. Doyuran, N. Akkas and P. Gulkan. 1985. “A probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Hazard in Turkey.” Tectonophysics, 117: 295–344.
Erdik, M., Y.A. Biro, T. Unur, K. Sesetyan and G. Birgoren. 1999. “Assessment of Earthquake Hazard in Turkey and Neighboring Regions.” Annali di Geofisica, Vol. 42, (No.6, December): 1125–1138.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1994. Assessment of the State-of-the-Art Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodologies - FEMA 249. Washington D.C.
Frankel, A., C. Mueller, D. Perkins, E.V. Leyendecker, N. Dickman, S. Hanson and M. Hopper. 1996. National Seismic Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996. Open-File Report 96–532, USGS, Denver.
Giardini, D. (Editor). 1999. Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) 1992–1999, Summary Volume. Annali di Geofisica, Vol. 42, No.6.
Gulkan, P. and M. Yuceman. 1991. Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment in Turkey. Report Prepared in Relation with the IASPEI-ESC Project on Worldwide Seismic Hazard Applications, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Statistics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Gutenberg, B. and C.F. Richter. 1944. “Frequency of Earthquakes in California.” BSSA, Vol. 34.
Hanson, S., and D. Perkins. 1995. Seismic Sources and Recurrence Rates as Adopted by USGS Staff for the Production of the 1982 and 1990 Probabilistic Ground Motion Maps for Alaska and Conterminous United States. USGS Open File Report 95–257.
Kiln, R. 1981. Reinsurance in Practice. Witherby and Co., Ltd, London.
Kircher, C. A., W. Holmes, O. Kustu, A. Nassar, R. Reitherman, and R. Whitman. 1997. “Building Damage and Loss.” Earthquake Spectra, Special volume on Loss Estimation, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
McGuire, R. (Editor). 1993. The Practice of Earthquake Hazard Assessment. International Association of Seismology and Physics of the Earth and European Seismological Commission.
National Institute of Building Sciences - NIBS. 1997 and 1999. HAZUS Technical Manuals, 3 Volumes. Washington, D.C.
National Research Council. 1989. Estimating Losses from Future Earthquakes. Report of the Panel on Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Papaioannou, C. A. and B.C. Papazachos. 2000. “Time-Independent and Time-Dependent Seismic Hazard in Greece Based on Seismogenic Sources.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 1: 22–33.
Risk Management Solutions, Inc. (RMS). 1995a. What if the 1906 Earthquake Strikes Again? A San Francisco Bay Area Scenario. Topical Issues Series, RMS, Menlo Park, CA.
Risk Management Solutions, Inc. (RMS). 1995b. What if a Major Earthquake Strikes the Los Angeles Area? Topical Issues Series, RMS, Menlo Park, CA.
Risk Management Solutions, Inc. (RMS). 1995c. What if the 1923 Earthquake Strikes Again? A Five Prefecture Tokyo Region Scenario. Topical Issues Series, RMS, Menlo Park, CA.
Schwartz, D.P. and K.J. Coppersmith. 1984. “Fault Behavior and Characteristic Earthquakes.” J. of Geophys. Research, Vol. 89.
Wesknousky, S.G. 1986. “Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California.” J. of, Vol. 91.
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. 1988. Probabilities of Large Earthquakes Occurring in California on the San Andreas Fault. Open File Report 83–398, USGS, Menlo Park, CA.
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. 1990. Probabilities of Large Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Region, California. Circular 1053, USGS, Menlo Park, CA.
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. 1995. “Seismic Hazards in Southern California: Probable Earthquakes, 1994 to 2024” BSSA, Vol. 85, No.2.
Youd, T.L. and D. M. Perkins. 1978. “Mapping of liquefaction induced ground failure potential.” Proc. of the ASCE, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 104 (GT4): 433–446.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bendimerad, F. (2001). Modeling and Quantification of Earthquake Risk: Application to Emerging Economies. In: Kleindorfer, P.R., Sertel, M.R. (eds) Mitigation and Financing of Seismic Risks: Turkish and International Perspectives. NATO Science Series, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0806-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0806-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7099-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0806-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive