Skip to main content

Cost, Distributive Justice and Noblesse Oblige

  • Chapter
Book cover Ethics, Medical Research, and Medicine
  • 117 Accesses

Abstract

Like most people in well-off countries, I had been aware that for a long time government officials have been concerned about the high, ever-expanding costs of health care, but since I was well insured through my university, I had little private concern. A more personal interest in this topic was sparked by a visit to a hospital ethics committee in Eugene, Oregon, arranged by a physician of my acquaintance who was on the committee. My interest was to obtain a personal impression of the kinds of ethical questions that are brought up in such settings and how they are dealt with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blendon RJ, Benson J, et al. (Winter, 1995). Who has the best health care system? Health Affairs:221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) (1999). Table supplied by Suzanne Edam, employee in the Paris headquarters of OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrol EE (June 4, 1995). U.S. runs arms race with itself. Register-Guard, Eugene, OR: 2C, 4C.

    Google Scholar 

  4. National health care expenditures projections tables (December 12, 1998). Health Care Financing Administration. http://www.hcfa.gov/stats/NHE-Proj/tables/default.htm

    Google Scholar 

  5. Strauss MJ, Bleecker GC, Steinwald AB (1993). Cost-effectiveness analyses in a changing health care environment: new issues and challenges. Eur J Cancer 29A(Suppl 7): S3–S5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balas EA, Kretschmer RAC, et. al. (1998). Interpreting cost analyses of clinical interventions. JAMA 279: 54–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. St. Leger HS (1998). Earlier study of effect on healthcare costs of preventing fatal diseases yielded similar results. BMJ 316:1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonneux L, Barendregt JJ, et al. (1998). Preventing fatal diseases increase healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach. BMJ 316: 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1998). Statistical abstract of the United States (118th edition). Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, A. (2001). Cost, Distributive Justice and Noblesse Oblige . In: Thompson, A., Temple, N.J. (eds) Ethics, Medical Research, and Medicine. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0794-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0794-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7103-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0794-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics