Advertisement

Disease Prevention: The Low-Tech, Low-Cost Road Less Travelled

  • Norman J. Temple

Abstract

In the several preceding chapters we have discussed how a dominant theme of much medical research is the search for new treatments. Typically, when new treatments are developed, they are high-tech and inevitably expensive, often to the extent that they are unaffordable for many people, even in First World countries. This problem is frequently compounded by a second problem: these new treatments are often put into practice without having to meet strict standards of efficacy, and, in many cases can actually result in more harm than good. A major reason for these problems is the profit motive: increasingly researchers and physicians profit financially from their relationship with commercial firms and this influences how research is carried out and how the results are interpreted and disseminated. Overall, the degree of success of modern medicine has been a good deal less than the spokespeople for medicine claim or that they routinely promise is just around the corner.

Keywords

Public Health Policy Blood Lead Level Tobacco Industry Family Heart Study Health Promotion Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark LC, Combs GF. et al. (1996). Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized trial. JAMA 276: 1957–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Lorgeril M, Salen P, et al. (1998). Mediterranean diet pattern in a randomized trial. Prolonged survival and possible reduced cancer rate. Arch Intern Med 158: 1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Lorgeril M. Salen P, et al. (1999). Mediterranean diet, traditional diet, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon Heart Study. Circulation 99: 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, et al. (2000). Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med 343: 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, et al. (1998). Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. Int J Obesity 22: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, et al. (1999). The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991–1998. JAMA 282: 1519–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siedell JC (1995). Obesity in Europe: scaling an epidemic. Int J Obesity 19(Suppl. 3): Sl–S4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li R, Serdula M, et al. (2000). Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in 16 US states: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1990–1996. Am J Public Health 90:777–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tippett KS, Cleveland LE (1999). In E Frazao. America’s eating habits: changes and consequences. Washington DC: USDA/ERS, Agricultural Information Bulletin Number 750 (April): 51–70.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Activity and Health Research (1992). Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey, a report on activity patterns and fitness levels: main findings. London: Sports Council and Health Education Authority.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones DA, Ainsworth BE, et al. (1998). Moderate leisure-time physical activity: who is meeting the public health recommendations? A national cross-sectional study. Arch Fam Med 7: 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anon (1998). Self-reported physical inactivity by degree of urbanization — United States, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 47: 1097–1100.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, et al. (1990). Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project. JAMA 264: 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luepker RV, Murray DM, et al. (1994). Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention: risk factor changes in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Public Health 84: 1383–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carleton RA, Lasater TM, et al. (1995). The Pawtucket Heart Health Program: community changes in cardiovascular risk factors and projected disease risk. Am J Public Health 85: 777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winkleby MA, Feldman HA, Murray DM (1997). Joint analysis of three U.S. community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular risk. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 645–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goodman RM, Wheeler FC, Lee PR (1995). Evaluation of the Heart To Heart Project: lessons from a community-based chronic disease prevention project. Am J Health Promot9: 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brownson RC, Smith CA, et al. (1996). Preventing cardiovascular disease through community-based risk reduction: the Bootheel Heart Health Project. Am J Public Health86:206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Puska P, Nissinen A, et al. (1985). The community based strategy to prevent coronary heart disease: conclusions from the ten years of North Karelia project. Ann Rev Public Health 6: 147–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valkonen T (1992). Trends in regional and socio-economic mortality differentials in Finland. Int J Health Sci 3: 157–166.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoffmeister H, Mensink GB, et al. (1996). Reduction of coronary heart disease risk factors in the German Cardiovascular Prevention study. Prev Med 25: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baxter T, Milner P, et al. (1997). A cost effective, community based heart health promotion project in England: prospective comparative study. BMJ 315: 582–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reger B, Wootan MG, Booth-Butterfield S (1999). Using mass media to promote healthy eating: a community-based demonstration project. Prev Med 29: 414–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dixon H, Boland R, et al. (1998). Public reaction to Victoria’s “2 Fruit ‘n’ 5 Veg Day” campaign and reported consumption of fruit and vegetables. Prev Med 27: 572–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sorensen G, Morris DM, et al. (1992). Work-site nutrition intervention and employees’ dietary habits: the Treatwell program. Am J Public Health 82: 877–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sorensen G, Stoddard A. et al. (1999). Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treatwell 5-a-Day Study. Am J Public Health 89: 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jeffery RW, Forster JL, et al. (1993). The Healthy Worker Project: a work-site intervention for weight control and smoking cessation. Am J Public Health 83: 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group (1994). Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: results of the OXCHECK study after one year. BMJ 308: 308–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group (1995). Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. BMJ310: 1099–10104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Family Heart Study Group (1994). Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British Family Heart Study. BMJ 308: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brunner E, White I, et al. (1997). Can dietary interventions change diet and cardiovascular risk factors? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Public Health 87: 1415–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Field K, Thorogood M, et al. (1995). Strategies for reducing coronary risk factors in primary care: which is most cost effective? BMJ 310: 1109–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lindholm LH, Ekbom T, et al. (1995). The impact of health care advice given in primary care on cardiovascular risk. BMJ 310: 1105–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rose G (1992). The strategy of preventive medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Meier KJ, Licari MJ (1997). The effect of cigarette taxes on cigarette consumption, 1955 through 1994. Am J Public Health 87:1126–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Townsend J (1996). Price and consumption of tobacco. Br Med Bull 52: 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Townsend J, Roderick P, Cooper J (1994). Cigarette smoking by socioeconomic group, sex, and age: effects of price income, and health publicity. BMJ 309: 923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stephens T, Pedersen LL, et al. (1997). The relationship of cigarette prices and no-smoking bylaws to the prevalence of smoking in Canada. Am J Public Health 87: 1519–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Anderson P, Lehto G (1994). Prevention policies. Br Med Bull 50: 171–185.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (1988). The Adelaide recommendations: healthy public policy. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    French SA, Jeffery RW, et al. (1997). A pricing strategy to promote low-fat snack choices through vending machines. Am J Public Health 87: 849–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jeffery RW, French SA, et al. (1994). An environmental intervention to increase fruit and salad purchases in a cafeteria. Prev Med 23: 788–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    French SA, Story M, et al. (1997). Pricing strategy to promote fruit and vegetable purchase in high school cafeterias. J Am Diet Assoc 97: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nestle M, Wing R, et al. (1998). Behavioral and social influence on food choice. Nutr Rev 56: S50–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Advertising Age (1999). 100 leading national advertisers: 44th annual report. (September 27):S1–S46.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kotz K, Story M (1994). Food advertisements during children’s Saturday morning television programming: Are they consistent with dietary recommendations? J Am Diet Assoc 94: 1296–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ostbye T, Pomerleau, et al. (1993). Food and nutrition in Canadian “prime time” television commercials. Can J Public Health 84: 370–374.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    James WPT, Ralph A (1992). National strategies for dietary change. In M Marmot, Elliott P, eds. Coronary heart disease. From aetiology to public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 525–540.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    James WPT (1995). A public health approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obesity 19(Suppl. 3): S37–S45.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nestle M (1998). Toward more healthful dietary patterns — A matter of policy. Public Health Rep 113: 420–423.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jeffery RW (1991). Population perspectives on the prevention and treatment of obesity in minority populations. Am J Clin Nutr 53: 1621S–1624S.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nestle M, Jacobson MF (2000). Halting the obesity epidemic public health policy approach. Public Health Rep 115: 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Blackburn H (1992). Community programmes in coronary heart disease prevention health promotion: changing community behavior.In: Marmot M, Elliott P, eds. Coronary heart disease. From aetiology to public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 495–514.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schmid TL, Pratt M. Howze E (1995). Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 85: 1207–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pirkle JL, Brody DJ, et al. (1994). The decline in blood lead levels in the United States. JAMA 272: 284–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brody DJ, Pirkle JL, et al. (1994). Blood lead levels in the US population. JAMA 272:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Moore S, Wolfe SM, et al. (1994). Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation. JAMA 272: 1171–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Glantz SA, Begay ME (1994). Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California. JAMA 272: 1176–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nestle M (1993). Food lobbies, the food pyramid and U.S. nutrition policy. Int J Health Serv 23: 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nestle M (1994). The politics of dietary guidance — A new opportunity. Am J Public Health 84: 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kaplan NM (2000). Evidence in favor of moderate dietary sodium reduction. Am J Hypertension 13: 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Goodlee F (1996). The food industry fights for salt. BMJ 312: 1239–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Klepp K, Forster JL (1985). The Norwegian Nutrition and Food Policy: an integrated approach to a public health problem. J Public Health Policy 6: 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Norum KR, Johansson L, et al. (1997). Nutrition and food policy in Norway: effects on reduction of coronary heart disease. Nutr Rev 55: S32–S39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Jeffery RW, Forster JL, et al. (1990). Community attitudes toward public policies to control alcohol, tobacco, and high-fat food consumption. Am J Prev Med 6: 12–19.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Whitney EN, Rolfes SR (1999). Understanding nutrition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norman J. Temple

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations