Abstract
The kinematic dynamo problem is rather well understood in the case of laminar flows [1]. Several simple but clever examples have been found in the past [2, 3, 4, 5] and more realistic geometries can be easily studied numerically [6]. However, most flows of liquid metal are fully turbulent before reaching the dynamo threshold: indeed, the magnetic Prandtl number, Pm = μ0σν, where μ0 is the magnetic permeability of vacuum, σ is the electric conductivity and ν is the kinematic viscosity, is smaller than 10-5 for all liquid metals. Since the dynamo action requires a large enough magnetic Reynolds number, Pm = μ0σLU, where U is the fluid characteristic velocity and L is the characteristic scale, one expects to observe the dynamo effect when the kinetic Reynolds number, Re = UL/ν, is larger that 106. The kinematic dynamo problem with a turbulent flow is much more difficult to solve. A theoretical approach exists only when the magnetic neutral modes grow at large scale. It has been shown that the role of turbulent fluctuations may be twofold: on one hand, they decrease the effective electrical conductivity and thus inhibits dynamo action by increasing Joule dissipation. On the other hand, they may generate a large scale magnetic field through the“alpha effect” or higher order similar effects [7]. Consequently, it is not known whether turbulent fluctuations inhibits or help dynamo action. More precisely, for a given configuration of the moving solid boundaries generating the flow, the behavior of the critical magnetic Reynolds number Rm c for the dynamo threshold, as a function of the flow Reynolds number Re (respectively Pm) in the limit of large Re (respectively small Pm), is not known.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
H. K. Moffatt, Magnetic field generation in electrically conducting fluids, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge 1978).
A. Herzenberg, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A250, 543 (1958)
D. Lortz, Plasma Phys. 10, 967 (1968).
Yu. B. Ponomarenko, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 14, 775 (1973).
G. O. Roberts, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 271, 411 (1972).
M. L. Dudley and R. W. James, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 425, 407 (1989).
F. Krause and K.-H. Radier, Mean field magnetohydrodynamics and dynamo theory, Pergamon Press (New-York, 1980).
F. J. Lowes and I. Wilkinson, Nature 198, 1158 (1963); 219, 717 (1968).
R. H. Kraichnan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1677 (1979).
M. Meneguzzi, U. Frisch and A. Pouquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1060 (1981).
F. Krause and R. Meinel, GAFD 43, 95 (1988).
A. D. Gilbert and P. L. Sulem, GAFD 51, 243 (1990).
A. V. Gruzinov and P. H. Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1651 (1994).
S. Childress and A. M. Soward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 837 (1972).
A. M. Soward, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 275, 611 (1974).
Y. Fauterelle and S. Childress, GAFD 22, 235 (1982).
A. M. Soward, GAFD 35, 329 (1986).
F. H. Busse, Generation of planetary magnetism by convection, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 12, 350–358 (1976).
A. P. Bassom and A. D. Gilbert, J. Fluid Mech. 343, 375 (1997).
P. H. Roberts, in Lectures on solar and planetary dynamos, chap. 1, M. R. E. Proctor and A. D. Gilbert eds., Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nunez, A., Petrelis, F., Fauve, S. (2001). Saturation of a Ponomarenko Type Fluid Dynamo. In: Chossat, P., Ambruster, D., Oprea, I. (eds) Dynamo and Dynamics, a Mathematical Challenge. NATO Science Series, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0788-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0788-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7070-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0788-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive