Skip to main content

Biotechnology and the Development of Norms Against BTW Agents

  • Chapter
Book cover The Role of Biotechnology in Countering BTW Agents

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((ASDT,volume 34))

  • 119 Accesses

Abstract

It may come as a surprise that an edited volume on modern biotechnology and its impact on ways countering BTW agents should conclude with a chapter on “norms”, a concept certainly more at home in sociology or political science. However, there are three main areas where modern biotechnology is of particular relevance for the development of norms and rules against BTW agents. The first of these areas is related to the enormous capital invested in commercial biotechnology applications and the huge profits that can be derived from these investments. [1] This might suggest that policy in this field is guided by economic imperatives rather than by normative ones. The second area is related to the “dual use” nature of modern biotechnology, i.e. its possible application in both the civil realm — to make diagnostics, vaccines, medicines — and in the military sphere. [2] This problem is aggravated by the third area, the difficulties involved in distinguishing between perfectly legitimate defensive military R&D and work on an offensive BW program. [3]

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Holmberg, A. (1994) Industry Concerns Regarding Disclosure of Proprietary Information, in Director Series on Proliferation, No. 4, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, pp. 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson, J.P. (1996) Some Lessons for the Biological Weapons Convention from Preparations to Implement the Chemical Weapons Convention. in O. Thränert (ed.), Enhancing the Biological Weapons Convention, Verlag J.H.W. Dietz Nachfolger, Bonn, pp. 86–113.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LappVé, M. (1990) Ethics in Biological Warfare Research, in S. Wright (ed.), Preventing A Biological Arms Race,: The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 78–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Müller, H. (1993) Die Chance der Kooperation. Regime in den Internationalen Beziehungen, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krasner, S. (1983) Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, in S. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Müller, H. (1993) The Internalization of Principles, Norms, and Rules by Governments. The Case of Security Regimes, in V. Rittberger with P. Mayer (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 361–388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sims, N. (1988) The Diplomacy of Biological Disarmament. Vicissitudes of a Treaty in Force, 1975–1985, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. PhRMA-website athttp://www.phrma.org/srpub/bwc.html#phrma

  9. Smithson, A.E. (1998) Man versus Microbe: The Negotiations to Strengthen the Biological Weapons Convention, in Biological Weapons Proliferation: Reasons for Concern, Courses of Action, Report No. 24, The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, D.C., pp. 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dando, M. (1998) Implications of a strengthened biological and toxin weapons convention for the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry, paper prepared for the Conference “A Strengthened BTWC - Potential hmplications for Biotechnology”, 28–29 May, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muth, W.L. (1999) The Role of the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries in Strengthening the Biological Disarmament Regime, Politics and the Life Sciences 18 (1), 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunger, I. (1996) Confidence Building Measures, in G. Pearson/M. Dando (eds.), Briefing Book for the Fourth Review Conference of the BWC, Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearson, G.S. (1997) Strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention: The Necessity for Non-Challenge Visits, Briefing Paper No.2University of Bradford, Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary (1998) Fact Sheet: The Biological Weapons Convention, Washington, D.C., 27 January.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thränert, O. (1998) Zwischen Rüstungskontrolle und Abschreckung: Amerikanische Antworten auf die Verbreitung Biologischer Waffen, Studie zur Außenpolitik, No.73Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts, B. (ed.) (2000) Hype or Reality? The New Terrorism and Mass Casualty Attacks, The Chemical and Biological Arms Control Institute (CBACI), Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lugar, R. (1998) Countering Chemical and Biological Weapons: The Need for a Defense in Depth, The Arena, No. 7, CBACI, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, H. (1999) XXBWC Update, Disarmament Diplomacy 42, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Colwell R.R. and Zilinskas, R.A. (2000) Bioethics and the Prevention of Biological Warfare, in R.A. Zilinskas (ed.), Biological Warfare - Modern Offense and Defense, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, pp. 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sinsheimer, R.L. (1990) Scientists and Research, in S. Wright (ed.), Preventing a Biological Arms Race,: The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buder, E., Geissler, E., and Gazsó, L. (eds.) (1998) Conversion of Former BTW Facilities, NATO-Science Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, J.P.P. (1998) The Impact of Pugwash on the Debates over Chemical and Biological Weapons, in Scientific Cooperation, State Conflict: The Roles of Scientists in Mitigating International Discord, Vol. 866, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 224–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A Draft Convention to Prohibit Biological and Chemical Weapons under International Criminal Law, Editorial (1998) The Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions Bulletin421–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Draft Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Developing, Producing, Acquiring, Stockpiling, Retaining, Transferring or Using Biological or Chemical Weapons (1998), The CBW Conventions Bulletin421998, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelle, A. (2001). Biotechnology and the Development of Norms Against BTW Agents. In: Kelle, A., Dando, M.R., Nixdorff, K. (eds) The Role of Biotechnology in Countering BTW Agents. NATO Science Series, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0775-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0775-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6906-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0775-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics