Rotifera IX pp 195-201 | Cite as

Diurnal vertical distribution of rotifers (Rotifera) in the Chara zone of Budzyńskie Lake, Poland

  • Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 153)

Abstract

Diurnal vertical distribution of rotifers was investigated in the Chara bed and the water immediately above it in the shallow region (ca. 1 m depth) of Budzyńskie Lake (Wielkopolski National Park, Poland) in early September 1998. Eighty one rotifer species were identified — 71 among Chara and 59 in the open water. Significant differences in rotifer densities were observed in the Chara, with highest numbers during the day (2316 ind. 1−1) and lowest numbers early morning (521 ind. 1−1) and at dusk (610 ind. 1−1). Above the Chara, the numbers of rotifers did not change significantly (615–956 ind. 1−1). Littoral- or limnetic-forms differed in their diel vertical distribution between both zones. One group of littoral species was characterized by increased densities in the Chara in the daytime, while a second group increased in density during the night. The densities of limnetic species, which were much higher in open water, decreased in the morning or daytime in this zone. These differences in the diel behaviour of particular groups of rotifers may be dependent on microhabitat and may also be related to different kinds of predation, the exploitative competition for shared food resources between rotifers and crustaceans, as well as typical adaptation to littoral or limnetic life.

Key words

rotifers diurnal vertical distribution Chara shallow lake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gliwicz, Z. M. & J. I. Rybak, 1976. Zooplankton. In Pieczyńska, E. (ed.), Selected Problems of Lake Littoral Ecology. Wyd. Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa: 69–96.Google Scholar
  2. Havens, K. E., 1991. Summer zooplankton dynamics in the limnetic and littoral zones of a humic acid lake. Hydrobiologia 215(1): 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jańczak, J., B. Brodzińska, A. Kowalik & R. Sziwa, 1996. Atlas of Lakes of Poland. T. I, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Poznań.Google Scholar
  4. Jeppesen, E, Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard, K. Christoffersen, J. Theil-Nielsen, K. Jürgens, S. Bosselmann & L. Schlüter, 1998. Cascading trophic interactions in the littoral zone of a shallow lake. In E. Jeppesen Doctor’s Dissertation - Ecology of Shallow Lakes - Trophic Interactions in the Pelagial. Ministry of Environment and Energy. National Environmental Research Institute. Technical Report No 247: 207–220.Google Scholar
  5. Jeppesen, E., T. L. Lauridsen, T. Kairesalo & M. R. Perrow, 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen (eds), The structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. Ecological Studies Series. Springer, New York: 131: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jose-De-Paggi, S., 1993. Composition and seasonality of planktonic rotifers in limnetic and littoral regions of a floodplain lake (Parana River system), Rev.-Hydrobiol.-Trop. 26(1): 53–63.Google Scholar
  7. Kairesalo, T., 1980. Diurnal fluctuations within a littoral plankton community in oligotrophic Lake Pääjärvi, southern Finland. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kairesalo, T., I. Tátrai & E. Luokkanen, 1998. Impacts of waterweed (Elodea canadensis Michx) on fish-plankton interactions in the lake littoral. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 1846–1851.Google Scholar
  9. Kuczyńska-Kippen, N., 1997. The role of refuge in horizontal distribution of Rotatoria of Budzyńskie Lake, Wielkopolski National Park, Poland. In proceedings of Conference: Aquatic Life Cycle Strategies, Plymouth, U.K. 14–17 April.Google Scholar
  10. Kuczyńska-Kippen, N & S. Cerbin, 1998. Diurnal changes in horizontal distribution of rotifers and crustaceans of a polymictic lake. In proceedings of Conference: Shallow Lakes. Trophic Interactions in Shallow Freshwater and Brackish Lakes. Berlin.Google Scholar
  11. Lair, N., H. Taleb & P. Reyes-Marchant, 1996. Horizontal distribution of the rotifer plankton of Lake Aydat (France). Aquat.-Sci. 58 (3): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lampert, W., 1993. Ultimate causes of diel vertical migration of zooplankton: new evidence for the predator-avoidance hypothesis. Archiv für Hydrobiol. Beihefte Ergenisse der Limnol. 39: 79–88.Google Scholar
  13. Lampert, W. & U. Sommer, 1993. Limnoökologie. Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Lauridsen, T. L. & I. Buenk, 1996. Diel changes in the horizontal distribution of zooplankton in the littoral zone of two shallow eutrophic lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. 137(2): 161–176.Google Scholar
  15. Lauridsen, T. L., L. J. Pedersen, E. Jeppensen & M. Søndegaard, 1994. Horizontal migration of zooplankton in the littoral zone in some shallow Danish lakes. Lake Reservoir Manage. 9, no. 2.Google Scholar
  16. Loose, C. J. & P. Dawidowicz, 1994. Trade-offs in dial vertical migration by zooplankton: the costs of predator avoidance. Ecology 75 (8): 2255–2263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michalkiewicz, M., 1990. Ecological basis of macrozoobentos occurrence. The dynamics of numbers and biomass. In Functioning of Water Ecosystems. Protection and Recultivation. Part II, Ecology of Lakes, Their Protection And Recultivation. Experiments on ecosystems. No. 50, SGGW-AR, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  18. Moss, B., M. Beklioglu & R. Kornijów, 1998. Differential effectiveness of nymphaeids and submerged macrophytes as refuges against fish predation for herbivorous Cladocera. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 26: 1863.Google Scholar
  19. Nogrady, T., R. Wallace & T. Snell, 1993. Rotifera. Vol. 1: Biology, Ecology and Systematics. SPB Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Paterson, M., 1993. The distribution of microcrustacea in the littoral zone of a freshwater lake. Hydrobiologia 263: 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pejler, B., 1995: Relation to habitat in rotifers. Hydrobiologia 313/314: 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pennak, R. W., 1966. Structure of zooplankton populations in the littoral macrophyte zone of some Colorado lakes. Trans, am. Micr. Soc. 85: 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preissler, K., 1977: Do rotifers show ’avoidance of the shore’. Oecologia 27(3): 253–260.Google Scholar
  24. Preissler, K., 1983. Adaptations in anatomy and orientation behaviour of rotifers and crustaceans of the littoral and pelagic region. Verh.-Ges.-Oekol. 10: 575–582.Google Scholar
  25. Schriver, P. J., Bøgestrand, E. Jeppesen & M. Søndergaard, 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: large scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smiley, E. A. & A. J. Tessier, 1998. Environmental gradients and the horizontal distribution of microcrustaceans in lakes. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stich, H. B. & W. Lampert, 1981. Predator evasion as an explanation of diurnal vertical migration by zooplankton. Nature 293: 396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Telesh, I. V., 1993. The effect of fish on planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255/256: 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Timms, R. M. & B. Moss, 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr 29: 472–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wickham, S. A. & J. J. Gilbert, 1980. Relative vulnerability of natural rotifer and ciliate communities to cladocerans: laboratory and field experiments. Freshwat. Biol. 26: 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williamson, C. E., 1987. Predator-prey interactions between omnivorous diaptomid copepods and rotifers: the role of prey morphology and behaviour. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wright, D. & J. Shapiro, 1990. Refuge availability: a key to understanding the summer disappearance of Daphnia. Freshwat. Biol. 24: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of HydrobiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations