Abstract
For us who today read Nietzsche after Heidegger, Nietzsche symbolizes the end of metaphysics (the death not only of “God” but also, as a necessary consequence, of the human “subject”). Whether or not Nietzsche actually succeeded in “overcoming metaphysics”—by means of his inventive myths, his “fictions,” of the Will to Power, theUebermensch, and the Eternal Return—or whether, as Heidegger would have had it, he was simply the “last of the metaphysicians,” his own “last man” in effect, is a question still awaiting an answer. What I wish to reflect on in this chapter is the meaning of what has been and is going on in the wake of Nietzsche’s genealogically deconstructive critique of the Tradition. Where do we stand, where can we stand when the very concept of “ground,” the metaphysical concept par excellence, has been swept away?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madison, G.B. (2001). Coping with Nietzsche’s Legacy. In: The Politics of Postmodernity. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0750-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0750-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3818-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0750-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive