Advertisement

Galileo and the Rhetoric of Relativity

  • Peter Machamer
Chapter

Abstract

This paper argues that Galileo well fitted in with the neo-Protagorian, person-relative framework that was emerging around him in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries in western Europe. For Galileo all knowledge depended crucially and essentially on first person experience, and at the same time this knowledge was objective, not subjective. The paper develops this tension and concludes with some remarks on its educational implications.

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Incline Plane Educational Implication Secondary Quality Floating Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Galileo: 1590, De Motu (On Motion), Translated by Stillman Drake, Madison, WI.: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Galileo: 1615, ‘Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina’, translated by Stillman Drake, in Stillman Drake (ed.), Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, New York: Doubleday Anchor 1957.Google Scholar
  3. Galileo: 1623, Il Saggiatore, The Assayer, Translated by Stillman Drake in The Controversy of the Comets of 1618, Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press 1960.Google Scholar
  4. Galileo: 1632, Dialogo, Dialogues Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, Translated by Stillman Drake, Berkeley, CA.: The University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  5. Galileo: 1640, Discorsi, Discourses on the Two New Sciences, Translated by Stillman Drake, Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Machamer, Peter: 1991, ‘The Person Centered Rhetoric of the 17th Century’, in M. Pera and W. Shea (eds.), Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric, Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Machamer, Peter and Woody, Andrea: 1994, ‘A Model of Intelligiblity in Science: Using Galileo’s Balance as a Model for Understanding the Motion of Bodies’, Science and Education, 3, 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Merton, Robert: 1938, Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England, New York: Harper and Row 1970.Google Scholar
  9. Mirowski, Philip: 1989, More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Wallace, William A.: 1992, Galileo’s Logic of Discovery and Proof, Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Weber, Max: 1904–5, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1958.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Machamer
    • 1
  1. 1.History and Philosophy of Science DepartmentUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations