Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Characterization of Polymers Modified by Atomic Oxygen and Ultraviolet Radiation

  • Corey L. Bungay
  • Thomas E. Tiwald
  • Michael J. Devries
  • John A. Woollam
  • Kim K. De Groh
Conference paper
Part of the Space Technology Proceedings book series (SPTP, volume 4)

Abstract

Atomic oxygen (AO) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced surface modifications of several space application polymers are investigated with spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE). The polymers studied include Kapton® polyimide, FEP Teflon®, CV-1144-0 silicone and polyarylene ether benzimidazole (PAEBI). Using in situ and ex situ SE covering a large spectral range from 190 nm to 14 μm, various parameters and trends of the polymers are measured as they are exposed to AO and/or UV light.

UV light greater than 200 nm wavelength is used to modify the surface of PAEBI and Kapton. Thickness and index of refraction as a function of depth of the UV-modified surface layers is quantified. The modified layers are optically-modelled assuming an exponentially graded layer, as opposed to standard models that often use either a single homogenous layer or linearly-graded layer. Measurements show that UV light causes a decrease in the index of refraction in both materials. The damaged layer in Kapton is approximately 500 nm into the polymer and approximately 200 nm in the PAEBI.

Two oxide forming polymers, CV-1144-0 silicone and PAEBI, are exposed to AO in an oxygen plasma. Protective oxide layers that form on the polymers are studied using SE. Oxide formation trends, rates of oxidation, amount of porosity, volume percentage of water, and change in optical properties as a function of AO exposure are quantified. Furthermore, studying the change in molecular bond vibrations in the infrared allowed a quasi-chemical analysis of the silicone.

Single wavelength ellipsometry over a large range of incident angles is used to measure changes in potical density of aluminizedFEP Teflon after being exposed to the Low Earth Orbit environment aboard the Hubble Space Telescope. The purpose of the study is to help support physical density measurements acquired by NASA Lewis Research Center. The optical density measurements are in good agreement with physical density measurements. These measurements are in good agreement with excessive heating was a major contributor to increases in density of the FEP returned from the second servicing mission.

Keywords

Porosity Quartz Anisotropy Argon Hydroxide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “US Standard Atmosphere, 1976,” NASA TM-X-74335, (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. A. Dever, “Low Earth Orbital Atomic Oxygen and Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on Polymers,” NASA Tech. Memo. 103711, (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. A. Banks, K. K. De Groh, S. K. Rutledge, and Frank J. DiFilippo, “Prediction of In-Space Durability of Protected Polymers Based on Ground Laboratory Thermal Energy Atomic Oxygen,” NASA Teck Memo. J07209, (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.M.A. Azzam, and N.M. Bashara, Ellipsometry and Polarized Light, North Holland Publishing, New York, (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. Wooilam, B. Jons, W. A. McGahan, P. G. Snyder, J. Hale, and H. W. Yao, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 324, 15 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. A. Wooilam, and P. G. Snyder, in Encyclopedia of Material Characterization, Butterworth-Heinemann, Publishers, Boston, 401 (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Jellison, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Spectroscopic Ellipsometry, Thin Solid Films, 234, 416 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Wooten, Optical Properties of Solids, Academic Press, New York, (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.F. Dyke, AJ. Floyd, M. Sainbury and R.S. Theobald, Organic Spectroscopy, Longman Group Limited, London, 13 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. K. Rutledge, B. A. Banks, et al., “An Evaluation of Candidate Oxidation Resistant Materials for Space Applications in LEO,” NASA Tech. Memo. 100122 (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. E. Aspnes, Phys. Rev. B, 33, 677 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Banks, K. K. de Groh, S. K. Rutledge, and F. J. DiFilippo, “Prediction of In-Space Durability of Protected Polymers Based on Ground Laboratory Thermal Energy Atomic Oxygen,” NASA Tech. Memo. 107209 (1996).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. A. Banks, J. A. Dever, L. Gebauer, and C. M. Hill, “Atomic oxygen interactions with FEP Teflon and silicones on LDEF’,” Proceedings of the LDEF First Post-Retrieval Symposium, Kissimmee, FL, June 2–8 1991, NASA CP 3134, Part 2, pg. 801–815.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. M. Zuby, K. K. de Groh, and D. C. Smith, “Degradation of FEP Thermal Control Materials Returned from the Hubble Space Telescope,” NASA Tech. Memo. 104627, (1995).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. K. de Groh and D. C. Smith, “Investigation of Teflon FEP Embrittlement on Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit,” Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Mat. in Space Env., Toulouse, FR, 255 (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. A. Banks, T. Stueber, S. K. Rutledge, D. Jaworske, and W. Peters, “Thermal Cycling-caused Degradation of Hubble Space Telescope Aluminized FEP Thermal Insulation,” AIAA #98-0896, (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corey L. Bungay
    • 1
  • Thomas E. Tiwald
    • 1
  • Michael J. Devries
    • 1
  • John A. Woollam
    • 1
  • Kim K. De Groh
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Microelectronic and Optical Materials Research, Dept. of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincoln
  2. 2.Nation Aeronautics and Space AdministrationLewis Research CenterCleveland

Personalised recommendations