Skip to main content

A Comparison of Space- and Ground-Based Facility Environmental Effects for Fep Teflon

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Space Technology Proceedings ((SPTP,volume 4))

Abstract

Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (PEP) Teflon™ is widely used as a thermal control material for spacecraft. However, it is susceptible to erosion, cracking, and subsequent mechanical failure in low Earth orbit (LEO). One of the difficulties in determining whether FEP Teflon will survive during a mission is the wide disparity of erosion rates observed for this material in space and in ground-based facilities. Each environment contains different levels of atomic oxygen, ions, and vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation, in addition to parameters such as the energy of the arriving species and temperature. These variations make it difficult to determine what is causing the observed differences in erosion rates.

This paper attempts to narrow down which factors affect the erosion rate of FEP Teflon through attempting to change only one environmental constituent at a time. This was attempted through the use of a single simulation facility (plasma asher) environment with a variety of Faraday cages and VUV transparent windows.

Isolating one factor inside of a radio frequency (RF) plasma proved to be very difficult. Two observations could be made. First, it appears that the erosion yield of FEP Teflon with respect to that of polyimide Kapton is not greatly affected by the presence or lack of VUV radiation present in the RF plasma and the relative erosion yield for the FEP Teflon may decrease with increasing fluence. Second, shielding from charged particles appears to lower the relative erosion yield of the FEP to approximately that observed in space, however it is difficult to determine for sure whether ions, electrons, or some other components are causing the enhanced erosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stidham, C.R. et at. “Low Earth Orbital Atomic Oxygen Environmental Simulation Facility for Space Materials Evaluation,” NASA TM-106128, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, C.L. et at. “The Vanderbilt University Neutral O-Beam Facility,” 18th International SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings, Oct. 7–9, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, G.S. Peplinski, D.R., “A Facility for Investigating Interactions of Energetic Atomic Oxygen with Solids,” Aerospace Report No. ATR-94 (8540).3,1985.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brinza, D.E. et at. “Production of Pulsed Atomic Oxygen Beams Via Laser Vaporization Methods,” 18th International SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings, Oct. 7–9, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rempt, R.D. “Production of a Beam of Ground State Oxygen Atoms of Selectable Energy,” 18th International SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings, Oct. 7–9, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sjolander, G.W. and Bareiss, L.E. “Martin Marietta Atomic Oxygen Beam Facility,” 18th International SAMPE Technical Conference Proceedings, Oct. 7–9, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caledonia, G.E. et al. “A High Flux Source of Energetic Oxygen Atoms for Material Degradation Studies,” AIAA 85–7015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rutledge, S.K. et al. “An Evaluation of Candidate Atomic Oxygen Resistant Materials for Space Applications in LEO,” NASA TM-100122, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rutledge, S.K., Banks, BA and Cales, M., “A Comparison of Atomic Oxygen Erosion Yields of Carbon and Selected Polymers Exposed in Ground Based Facilities and in Low Earth Orbit,” AIAA-942628

    Google Scholar 

  10. Banks, B.A. “The Use of Fluoropolymers in Space Applications,” Modern Fluoropolymers, Scheirs, J. Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1997), 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rutledge, S.K., Banks, B.A., Kitral, M. (2001). A Comparison of Space- and Ground-Based Facility Environmental Effects for Fep Teflon. In: Kleiman, J.I., Tennyson, R.C. (eds) Protection of Space Materials from the Space Environment. Space Technology Proceedings, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0714-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0714-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3838-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0714-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics