Skip to main content

Handling the Back Calculation Problem in Aerial Spray Models Using a Genetic Algorithm

  • Chapter
Practical Applications of Computational Intelligence Techniques

Part of the book series: International Series in Intelligent Technologies ((ISIT,volume 16))

  • 166 Accesses

Abstract

The United States Department of Agriculture — Forest Service (USDA-FS) has been involved in the development of computer models to simulate deposition from aerial pesticide spraying since the early 1970s. Originally, this work was driven by the need to improve the percentage of aerially sprayed material that actually deposited on a target area. The amount of on-target deposition is a primary factor in determining the level of pest control achieved. A second focus of this modeling work that has become the objective in much of the recent work is to use modeling to determine the amount of sprayed material that does not land on the target area and is defined as “drift”. It is assumed that drift causes unintended environmental consequences and is a form of environmental pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bi, W., Potter, W.D., Twardus, D., Thistle, H., Ghent, J., Twery, M., and Teske, M. (2000), “Aerial spray optimization,”Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence(IC-AI’2000), Las Vegas, NV, pp.743–480.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilanin, A.J. and Teske, M.E. (1984), “Numerical Studies of the Deposition of Material Released from Fixed and Rotary Wing Aircraft,” NASA Contractor Report 3779.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bilanin, A.J., Teske, M.E., Barry, J.W., and Ekblad, R.B. (1989), “AGDISP: the aircraft spray dispersion model, code development and experimental validation,”Transactions of the ASAE32(1): 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess, C.J., Chalmers, A.J. (1999), "The optimization of irregular computer architectures using genetic agorithms,"Baltzer Journals.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coello, C.A.C., Dudnick, M., and Christiansen, A.D. (1994), “Using genetic algorithms for optimal design of trusses,”Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligencepp. 88–94, New Orleans, LA, November.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cvetkovic, D. and Parmee, I.C., (1999), “Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization and conceptual engineering design,”Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary ComputationCEC’99, Washington D.C., July.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, L. (Ed.) (1991)Handbook of Genetic AlgorithmsVan Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dick, R.P., and Jha, N.K. (1997), “MOGAC: a multiobjective genetic algorithm for the co-synthesis of hardware-software embedded systems,”Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Computer-Aided Design(ICCAD ‘87), San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, D.E. (1989)Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holland, J.H. (1975)Adaptation in Natural and Artificial SystemsAnn Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jog, P., Suh, J.Y., and Gucht, D.V. (1989), “The effects of population size, heuristic crossover and local improvement on a genetic algorithm for the traveling salesman problem,”Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic AlgorithmsMorgan Kaufmann Publishing, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klir, G.J., St Clair, U.H., and Yuan, B. (1997)Fuzzy Set Theory: Foundations and ApplicationsPrentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kosko, B. (1991)Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems a Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine IntelligencePrentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [ Lee, M.A. and Takagi, H. (1993), “Dynamic control of genetic algorithms using fuzzy logic techniques,”Proceeding of Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms(ICGA’93), Urbana-Champaign, IL, pp.76–83, July.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levine, D.M. (1993), “A genetic algorithm for the set partitioning problem,”Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic AlgorithmsJuly, pp. 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michalewicz, Z. (1992)Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution ProgramsSpinger-Verlag, New York, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirkovic, J., Cvetkovic, D., Tomca, N., Cveticanin, S., Slijepcevic, S., Obradovic, V., Mrkic, M., Cakulev, I., Kraus, L., and Milutinovic, V. (1999), “Genetic algorithms for intelligent internet search: a survey and a package for experimenting with various locality types,”IEEE TCCA Newsletterpp. 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pabico, J.P. (1996)A Genetic Algorithm Approach for the Determination of Cultivar Coefficients in Crop ModelsMaster’ s Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parkin, C.S. and Wyatt, J.C. (1982), “The determination of flight-lane separations for the aerial application of herbicides,”Crop Protectionvol. 1, no. 3, pp. 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parmee, I.C. and Dragan, C. (1999), “Use of preferences for GA-based multi-objective optimization”, in Banzhaf, W.et al.(Eds.),Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference(GECCO ‘89), Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Potter, W.D., Miller, J.A., Tonn, B.E., Gandham, R.V., and Lapena, C.N. (1991), “Improving the reliability of heuristic multiple fault diagnosis via the environmental conditioning operator,”International Journal of Applied Intelligencevol. 2, pp. 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Potter, W.D., Pitts, R., Gillis, P., Young, J., and Caramadre, J. (1992), “IDA-NET: an intelligent decision aid for battlefield communication network configuration,”Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications(CAIA’92), pp. 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Potter, W.D., Bi, W., Twardus, D., Thistle, H., Ghent, J., Twery, M., and Teske, M. (1999), “Intelligent decision support for US forest aerial spray,”Papers from the AAAI Workshop on Environmental Decision Support Systems and Artificial IntelligenceOrlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Potter, W.D., Bi, W., Twardus, D., Thistle, H., Ghent, J., Twery, M., and Teske, M. (2000), “Aerial spray management using the genetic algorithm,”Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems(IEA-AIE’2000) New Orleans, LA, pp. 210–219.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teske, M.E. and Curbishley, T.B. (1990), “Forest Service Aerial Spray Computer Model FSCBG 4.0 User Manual,” Technical Report Number 90–06, Continuum Dynamics, Inc., Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Teske, M.E., Bowers, J.F., Rafferty, J.E., and Barry, J.W. (1993), “FSCBG: an aerial spray dispersion model for predicting the fate of released material behind aircraft,”Environmental Toxicology and Chemistryvol. 12, pp. 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teske, M.E. and Barry, J.W. (1993), “Parameter sensitivity in aerial application,”Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineersvol. 36, no. 1, pp. 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Teske M.E., Barry, J.W., and Thistle, H.W. (1994), “Aerial spray drift modeling,”Environmental Modeling Vol. II.P. Zanetti (Ed.), Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teske, M.E., Bird, S.L., Esterly, D.M., Ray, S.L., and Perry, S.G. (1997), “A User’s Guide for AgDRIFT 1.0: a Tiered Approach for the Assessment of Spray Drift of Pesticides,” Technical Note Number 95–10. Continuum Dynamics, Inc., Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Teske, M.E. (1998), “AGDISP DOS Version 7.0 User Manual,” Technical Note Number 98–13, Continuum Dynamics, Inc., Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Teske, M.E., Thistle, H.W., and Eav, B. (1998), “New ways to predict aerial spray deposition and drift,”Journal of Forestryvol. 96, no. 6, pp. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Potter, W.D. et al. (2001). Handling the Back Calculation Problem in Aerial Spray Models Using a Genetic Algorithm. In: Jain, L., De Wilde, P. (eds) Practical Applications of Computational Intelligence Techniques. International Series in Intelligent Technologies, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0678-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0678-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3868-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0678-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics