Skip to main content

Some Fundamental Criteria of the Scientific Method and the Internal Structure of Science

  • Chapter
Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 219))

Abstract

The author’s intention is to represent a brief review of the mainly normative methodological criteria, which enable one to distinguish the scientific approach from the non-scientific or arbitrary one. These normative criteria are applicable, if the completed text pretending to be a scientific one is available. They are indifferent in respect of the way such text has been created. And they are not directly usable for the evaluation of the degree of originality of the data and conceptions represented in such text. Therefore a plain use of these rules can not substitute an evaluation by the competent expert, so far as the positive aspect of this activity is considered. But, in many cases they enable the detection of the non-or antiscientific approach without need for going deep into details. And they may foster the critical attitude of the investigators to their own work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brillouin, L. 1960 Science and information theory [version in Russian] Moscow: Inostr. Liter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillouin, L. 1966 Scientific uncertainty and Information [version in Russian] Moscow: Inostr. Liter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamming, R. W. 1993 ’Science in the eye of the beholder’. Computers Chem., 18: 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm, V. A. 1967 Foundations of Quantitative Theory of Organic Reactions 2“d Edition 1977 [in Russian]. Leningrad: Khimia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, V. 1994 ’Some basic criteria of the scientific method and internal structure of science’. R. Vihalemm et al. (eds.) Science Studies Today, IX: 120–130 [in Estonian]. Tallinn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palm, V. (2001). Some Fundamental Criteria of the Scientific Method and the Internal Structure of Science. In: Vihalemm, R. (eds) Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 219. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3863-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0672-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics