Skip to main content

The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense

  • Chapter
Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 219))

Abstract

Whereas the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is notorious as a contradiction of a common sense realistic worldview, I will try to show that ordinary speech reveals the use of an implicit logic that recalls, in a way, the Copenhagen interpretation. An attempt is made to formalize this logic, concerning deontic concepts and propositional attitudes. The suggested approach also allows the avoidance of some well-known paradoxes of standard deontic logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aqvist, L. 1967 ‘Good Samaritans, Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, and Epistemic Obligations’.Noûs 1: 361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. 1963 ‘Contrary-To-Duty imperatives and Deontic Logic’.Analysis, 24: 33–36. Dummett, M. 1963 ‘Truth’.Truth and Other Enigmas, 1–24. (First printed in 1959, inProceedings of the Aristotelean Society, n.s., LIX.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. van 1972 ‘The Logic of Conditional Obligation’.Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1: 417–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, B. van 1991Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View.Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fpllesdal, D. and Hilpinen, R. 1970 ‘Deontic Logic: An Introduction. R. Hilpinen (ed.)Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, 1–35. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, J. 1937/38 ‘Imperatives and Logic’. Erkenntnis, 7: 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, A. 1941 ‘Imperatives and logic’.Theoria, 7: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. von 1951 ‘Deontic Logic’.Mind, 60: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, H. von 1998 ‘Deontic Logic — as I See it.’ In: ΔEON’98. 4thInternational Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Bologna, 8–10 January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalta, E. N. 1988 Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Unt, A. (2001). The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and Common Sense. In: Vihalemm, R. (eds) Estonian Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 219. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0672-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3863-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0672-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics