Structure-function relationships of β-D-glucan endo- and exohydrolases from higher plants

  • Maria Hrmova
  • Geoffrey B. Fincher

Abstract

(1→3),(1→4 )-β-D-Glucans represent an important component of cell walls in the Poaceae family of higher plants. A number of glycoside endo- and exohydrolases is required for the depolymerization of (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucans in germinated grain or for the partial hydrolysis of the polysaccharide in elongating vegetative tissues. The enzymes include (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucan endohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.73), which are classified as family 17 glycoside hydrolases, (1→4)-β-D-glucan glucohydrolases (family 1) and β-D-glucan exohydrolases (family 3). Kinetic analyses of hydrolytic reactions enable the definition of action patterns, the thermodynarnics of substrate binding, and the construction of subsite maps. Mechanism-based inhibitors and substrate analogues have been used to study the spatial orientation of the substrate in the active sites of the enzymes, at the atomic level. The inhibitors and substrate analogues also allow us to define the catalytic mechanisms of the enzymes and to identify catalytic amino acid residues. Three-dimensional structures of (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanendohydrolases, (1→4)-β- D-glucan glucohydrolases and β-D-glucan exohydrolases are available or can be reliably modelled from the crystal structures of related enzymes. Substrate analogues have been diffused into crystals for solving of the three-dimensional structures of enzyme-substrate complexes. This information provides valuable insights into potential biological roles of the enzymes in the degradation of the barley (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucans during endosperm mobilization and in cell elongation.

Key words

catalytic mechanism cell wall hydrolysis monocotyledons protein modelling substrate binding subsite mapping 

Abbreviations

3D

three-dimensional

HCA

hydrophobie cluster analYsis

4NPG

4-nitrophenyl β-D-glucoside

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M.A. and Stone, B.A. 1975. A new substrate for investigating the specificity of β-D-glucan hydrolases. FEBS Lett. 52: 202–207.Google Scholar
  2. Asensio, J.L., Canada, F.J., Siebert, H.C., Laynez, J., Poveda, A, Nieto, P.M., Soedjanaamadja, V.M., Gabius, H.J. and Jimenez-Barbero, J. 2000. Structural basis for ehitin recognition by defense proteins: GlcNAc residues are bound in a multivalent fashion by extended binding sites in hevein domains. Chem. Biol. 7: 529–543.Google Scholar
  3. Bacie, A, Harris, P.J. and Stone, B.A. 1988. Structure and function of plant cell walls. In: J. Preiss (Ed.) The Biochemistry of Plants, Academic Press, New York/London/San Francisco, pp. 297–371.Google Scholar
  4. Bamforth, C.W. and Martin, H.L. 1981. The development of β-D-glucan solubilase during barley germination. J. Inst. Brew. 87: 81–84.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, T., Suresh, S.G., Tolley, S.P., Dodson, E.J. and Hughes, M.A. 1995. The crystal structure of cyanogenic β-glucosidase from white clover; a family 1 glycosyl hydrolase. Structure 3: 951–960.Google Scholar
  6. Biely, P., Kratky, Z. and Vrsanska, M. 1981. Substrate-binding site of endo-1,4-β-xylanase of the yeast Cryptococcus albidus. Eur. J. Biochem. 119: 559–564.Google Scholar
  7. Blundell, T.L. and Johnson, L.N. 1976. Protein Crystallography. Academy Press, New York/London/San Francisco.Google Scholar
  8. Brändén, C.I. 1980. Relation between structure and function of α/β proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 13: 317–338.Google Scholar
  9. Briggs, D.E. 1992. Barley germination: biochemical changes and hormonal control. In: P.R. Shewry (Ed.) Barley: Genetics, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, CAB International, UK, pp. 369–401.Google Scholar
  10. Burton, R.A., Gibeaut, D.M., Bacic, A., Findlay, K., Roberts, K., Hamilton, A., Baulcombe, D.C. and Fincher, G.B. 2000. Virus-induced silencing of a plant cellulose synthase gene. Plant Cell 12: 691–705.Google Scholar
  11. Callebaut, I., Labesse, G., Durand, P., Poupon, A., Canard, L., Chomolier, J., Heurissat, B. and Mornon, J.P. 1997. Deciphering protein sequence information through hydrophobie cluster analysis (HCA): current status and perspectives. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53: 621–645.Google Scholar
  12. Carpita, N.C. 1984. Cell wall development in maize coleoptiles. Plant Physiol 76: 205–212.Google Scholar
  13. Carpita, N.C and Gibeaut, D.M. 1993. Structural models of primary cell walls in fiowering plants: consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3: 1–30.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, L., Fincher, G.B. and Høj, P.B. 1993. Evolution of polysaccharide hydrolase substrate specificity. Catalytic amino acids are conserved in barley 1,3;1,4-β-D-glucanase and 1,3-β-D-glucanase. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 13318–13326.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, L., Sadek, M., Stone, B.A., Brownlee, R.T.C., Fincher, G.B. and Høj, P.B. 1995a. Stereochemical course of glucan hydrolysis by barley (1→3)-and (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1253: 12–116.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, L., Garrett, T.P.J., Fincher, G.B. and Høj, P.B. 1995b. A tetrad of ionizable amino acids is important for catalysis in barley β-D-glucanases. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 8093–8101.Google Scholar
  17. Chipman, D.M., Grisaro, V. and Sharon, N. 1967. The binding of oligosaccharides containing N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid to lysozyme. J. Biol. Chem. 242: 4388–4395.Google Scholar
  18. Chothia, C. and Lesk, A.M. 1986. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5: 823–826.Google Scholar
  19. Cline, K. and Albersheim, P. 1981. Host-pathogen interactions. XVI. Purification and characterization of a glucosyl hydrolaseltransferase present in the walls of soybean cells. Plant Physiol. 68: 207–220.Google Scholar
  20. Cosgrove, D.J. 1999. Enzymes and other agents that enhance cell wall extensibility. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50: 391–417.Google Scholar
  21. Crombie, H., Chengappa, S., Hellyer, A. and Reid, J.S.G. 1998. A xyloglucan oligosaccharide-active, transglycosylating β-D-glucosidase from the cotyledons of nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus L) seedlings: purification, properties and characterization of a cDNA clone. Plant J. 15: 27–38.Google Scholar
  22. Damude, H.G., Withers, S.G., Kilbum, D.G., Miller, R.C. and Warren, R.A.J. 1995. Site-directed mutagenesis of the putative catalytic residues of endoglucanase CenA from Cellulomonas fimi. Biochemistry 34: 2220–2224.Google Scholar
  23. Davies, G.J. and Heurissat, B. 1995. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure 3: 853–859.Google Scholar
  24. Davies, G.J., Wilson, K.S. and Henrissat, B. 1997. Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem. J. 321: 557–559.Google Scholar
  25. Fincher, G.B. 1989. Molecular and cellular biology associated with endosperm mobilization in germinating cereal grains. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 305–346.Google Scholar
  26. Fincher, G.B. 1992. Cell wall metabolism in barley. In: P.R. Shewry (Ed.) Barley: Genetics, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. CAB International, UK, pp. 413–437.Google Scholar
  27. Gibeaut, D.M. and Carpita, N.C. 1991. Tracing cell wall biogenesis in intact cells and plants. Selective tumover and alteration of soluble cell wall polysaccharides in grasses. Plant Physiol. 97: 551–561.Google Scholar
  28. Gilkes, N.R., Henrissat, B., Kilburn, D.G., Miller, J.C. Jr. and Warren, R.A.J. 1991. Domains in microbial β-1,4-glycanases: sequence conservation, function and enzyme families. Microbiol. Rev. 55: 303–315.Google Scholar
  29. Guex, N. and Peitsch, M.C. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18: 2714–2723.Google Scholar
  30. Harvey, A.J., Hrmova, M., de Gori, R., Varghese, J.N. and Fincher, G.B. 2000. Comparative modeling of the three-dimensional structures of family 3 glycoside hydrolases. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 41: 257–269.Google Scholar
  31. Harvey, A.J., Hrmova, M. and Fincher, G.B. 2001. Regulation of genes encoding β-D-glucan glucohydrolases in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Physiol. Plant. 112: in press.Google Scholar
  32. Havukainen, R., Torronen, A., Laitinen, T. and Rouvinen, J. 1996. Covalent binding of three epoxyalkyl xylosides to the active site of endo-1,4-β-xylanase II from Trichoderma reesei. Biochemistry 35: 9617–9624.Google Scholar
  33. Heightman, T.D. and Vasella, A.T. 2000. Recent insight into inhibition, structure and mechanism of configuration of retaining glycosidases. Angew. Rev. Int. Ed. 38: 750–770.Google Scholar
  34. Henrissat, B. 1991. A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino acid sequence similarities. Biochem. J. 280: 309–316.Google Scholar
  35. Henrissat, B. 1998. Glycosidase families. Biochem. Soc. Transact. 26: 153–156.Google Scholar
  36. Henrissat, B. and Davies, G. 1997. Structural and sequence-based classificlftion of glycoside hydrolases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 637–644.Google Scholar
  37. Henrissat, B., Callebaut, I., Fabrega, S., Lehn, P., Mornon, J.P. and Davies, G.J. 1995. Conserved catalytic machinery and the prediction of a common fold for several families of glycosyl hydrolases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7090–7094.Google Scholar
  38. Henrissat, B., Coutinho, P.M. and Davies, G.J. 2001. A census of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol., this issue.Google Scholar
  39. Hiromi, K. 1970. Interpretation of dependency of rate parameters on the degree of polymerization of substrate in enzymecatalyzed reactions. Evaluation of subsite affinities of exoenzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 40: 1–6.Google Scholar
  40. Hoare, D.G. and Koshland, D.E. Jr. 1967. A method for quantitative modification and estimation of carboxylic acid groups in proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 242: 2447–2453.Google Scholar
  41. Høj, P.B., Rodriguez, E.B., Stick, R.Y. and Stone, B.A. 1989. Differences in active site structure in a family of β-D-glucan endohydrolases deduced from the kinetics of inactivation by epoxyalkyl β-oligoglucosides. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 4939–4947.Google Scholar
  42. Høj, P.B., Rodriguez, E.B., Iser, J.R., Stick, R.V. and Stone, B.A. 1991. Active site-directed inhibition by optically pure epoxyalkyl cellobiosides reveals differences in active site geometry of two 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-D-glucanohydrolases. The importance of epoxide stereochemistry for enzyme inactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 11628–11631.Google Scholar
  43. Høj, P.B., Condron, R., Traeger, J.C., McAuliffe, J.C. and Stone, B.A. 1992. Identification of glutamic acid 105 at the active site of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 1,3-1,4-β-D-glucan 4-Dglucanohydrolase using epoxide-based inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 25059–25066.Google Scholar
  44. Høj, P.B. and Fincher, G.B. 1995. Molecular evolution of plant β-D-glucan endohydrolases. Plant J. 7: 367–379.Google Scholar
  45. Hoson, T. and Nevins, D.J. 1989. β-D-glucan antibodies inhibit auxin-induced cell elongation and changes in cell wall of Zea coleoptile segments. Plant Physiol. 90: 1353–1358.Google Scholar
  46. Hrmova, M. and Fincher, G.B. 1998. Barley β-D-glucan exohydrolases. Substrate specificity and kinetic properties. Carbohydrate Res. 305: 209–221.Google Scholar
  47. Hrmova, M., Garrett, T.P.J. and Fincher, G.B. 1995. Subsite affinities and disposition of catalytic arnino acids in the substrate-binding region of barley 1,3-β-D-glucanases. Implications in plant-pathogen interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 14556–14563.Google Scholar
  48. Hrmova, M., Harvey, A.J., Wang, J., Shirley, N.J., Jones, G.P., Stone, B.A., Høj, P.B. and Fincher, G.B. 1996. Barley β-D-glucan exohydrolases with β-D-glucosidase activity. Purification, characterization, and determination of primary structure from a cDNA clone. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 5277–5286.Google Scholar
  49. Hrmova, M., MacGregor, E.A., Biely, P., Stewart, R.J. and Fincher, G.B. 1998a. Substrate binding and catalytic mechanism of a barley β-D-glucosidase/(1,4)-β-D-glucan exohydrolase. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 11134–11143.Google Scholar
  50. Hrmova, M., Varghese, J.N., Høj, P.B. and Fincher, G.B. 1998b. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of β-D-glucan exohydrolase isoenzyme ExoI from barley (Hordeum vulgare). Acta Crystallogr. D54: 687–689.Google Scholar
  51. Inouhe, M. and Nevins, D.J. 1998. Changes in the activities and polypetide levels of exo-and endoglucanases in cell walls during developmental growth of Zea mays coleoptiles. Plant Cell Physiol. 39: 762–768.Google Scholar
  52. Inouhe, M., Hayashi, K. and Nevins, D.J. 1999. Polypeptide characteristics and immunological properties of exo-and endoglucanases purified from maize coleoptile cell walls. J. Plant Physiol. 154: 334–340.Google Scholar
  53. Jenkins, J., Lo Leggio, L., Harris, G. and Pickersgill, R. 1995. β-Glucosidase, β-galactosidase, family A cellulases, family F xylanases and two barley glycanases for a superfamily of enzymes with 8-fold β/α architecture and with two conserved glutamates near the carboxy-terminal ends of β-strands four and seven. FEBS Lett. 362: 281–285.Google Scholar
  54. Johnson, P.E., Brun, E., Mackenzie, L.E, Withers, S.G. and McIntosh, L.P. 1999. The cellulose-binding domains from Cellulomonas fimi β-1,4-D-glucanase CenC bind nitroxide spin-labeled cellooligosaccharides in multiple orientations. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 609–625.Google Scholar
  55. Keitel, T., Simon, O., Borriss, R. and Heinemann, U. 1993. Molecular and active-site structure of a Bacillus 1,3–1,4-β-D-glucanase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5287–5291.Google Scholar
  56. Kim, J.B., Olek, A.T. and Carpita, N.C. 2000. Cell wall and membrane-associated exo-β-D-glucanases from developing maize seedlings. Plant Physiol. 123: 471–485.Google Scholar
  57. Koshland, D.E. Jr. 1953. Stereochemistry and the mechanism of enzymatic reactions. Biol. Rev. 28: 416–436.Google Scholar
  58. Koshland, D.E. Jr. 1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44: 98–104.Google Scholar
  59. Kotake, T., Nakagawa, N., Takeda, K. and Sakurai, N. 1997. Purification and characterization of wall-bound exo-1,3-β-D-glucanase from barley (Hordeum vulgare L) seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 38: 194–200.Google Scholar
  60. Kraulis, P. 1991. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24: 946–950.Google Scholar
  61. Labrador, E. and Nevins, D.J. 1989. An exo-β-D-glucanase derived from Zea coleoptile walls with a capacity to elicit cell elongation. Physiol. Plant. 77: 479–486.Google Scholar
  62. Laitinen, T., Rouvinen, J. and Perakyla, M. 2000. Inversion of the roles of the nucleophile and acidlbase catalysts in the covalent binding of epoxyalkyl xyloside inhibitor to the catalytic glutamates of endo-1,4-β-xylanase (XYLII): a molecular dynamics study. Protein Eng. 13: 247–252.Google Scholar
  63. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S. and Thornton, J.M. 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26: 283–291.Google Scholar
  64. Leah, R., Kigel, J., Svendsen, I., Mundy, J. 1995. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a barley seed β-glucosidase. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 15789–15797.Google Scholar
  65. Legler, G. 1990. Glycoside hydrolases: mechanistic information from studies with reversible and irreversible inhibitors. Adv. Carbohydrate Chem. Biochem. 48: 319–384.Google Scholar
  66. Legler, G. and Herrchen, M. 1981. Active site directed inhibition of galactosidase by conduritol C epoxides (1,2-anhydro-epi-and neo-inositol). FEBS Lett. 135: 139–144.Google Scholar
  67. Lienart, Y., Comtat, J. and Barnoud, E. 1986. A wall-bound exo-β-D-glucanase from Acacia cultured cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 883: 353–360.Google Scholar
  68. Litts, J.C, Simmons, C.R., Karrer, K.E., Huang, N. and Rodriguez, R.L. 1990. The isolation and characterization of a barley (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanase gene. Eur. J. Biochem. 194: 831–838.Google Scholar
  69. Ly, H.D. and Withers, S.G. 1999. Mutagenesis of glycosidases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68: 487–522.Google Scholar
  70. McCarter, J.D. and Withers, S.G. 1994. Mechanism of enzymatic glycoside hydrolysis. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4: 885–892.Google Scholar
  71. McFadden, G.I., Ahluwalia, B., Clarke, A.E. and Fincher, G.B. 1988. Expression sites and developmental regulation of genes encoding (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanase in germinated barley. Planta 173: 500–508.Google Scholar
  72. Morrall, P. and Briggs, D.E. 1978. Changes in cell wall polysaccharides of germinating barley grains. Phytochemistry 17: 1495–1502.Google Scholar
  73. Moreau, V. and Driguez, H. 1995. Enzymic synthesis of hemithiocellodextrins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Transact. 1: 525–527.Google Scholar
  74. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K. and Honig, B. 1991. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 4: 281–296.Google Scholar
  75. Parsiegla, G., Reverbel-Leroy, C., Tardif, C., Belaich, P., Driguez, H. and Haser, R. 2000. Crystal structures of the cellulase Ce148F in complex with inhibitors and substrates give insight into its processive action. Biochemistry 39: 11238–11246.Google Scholar
  76. Parrish, E.W., Perlin, A.S. and Reese, E.T. 1960. Selective enzymolysis of poly-β-D-glucans, and the structure of the polymers. Can. J. Chem. 38: 2094–2104.Google Scholar
  77. Roulin, S., Buchala, A.J. and Fincher, G.B. 2001. Induction of (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucan hydrolases in leaves of darkincubated barley seedlings. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  78. Sakurai, N. and Masuda, Y. 1978. Auxin-induced changes in barley coleoptile cell wall composition. Plant Cell Physiol 19: 1217–1223.Google Scholar
  79. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 779–815.Google Scholar
  80. Shibuya, N. and Misaki, A. 1978. Structure of hemicellulose isolated from rice endosperm cell wall: mode of linkages and sequences in xyloglucan, β-D-glucan and arabinoxylan. Agric. Biol. Chem. 42: 2267–2274.Google Scholar
  81. Simmons, C.R., Litts, J.C., Huang, N. and Rodriguez, R.L. 1992. Strucmre of a rice β-D-glucanase gene regulated by ethylene, cytokinin, wounding, salicylic acid and fungal elicitors. Plant Mol. Biol. 18: 33–45.Google Scholar
  82. Simos, G., Panagiotidis, C.A., Skoumbas, A, Choli, D., Ouzounis, C. and Georgatsos, J.G. 1994. Barley β-glucosidase-expression during seed germination and maturation and partial amino acid sequences. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1199: 52–58.Google Scholar
  83. Sinnott, M.L. 1990. Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem. Rev. 90: 1171–1202.Google Scholar
  84. Slakeski, N., Baulcombe, D.C., Devos, K.M., Ahluwalia, B., Doan, D.N.P. and Fincher, G.B. 1990. Structure and tissue-specific regulation of genes encoding barley (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucan endohydrolases. Mol. Gen. Genet. 224: 437–449.Google Scholar
  85. Slakeski, N. and Fincher, G.B. 1992. Developmental regulation of (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanase gene expression in barley. I. Tissue specific expression of individual isoenzymes. Plant Physiol. 99: 1226–1231.Google Scholar
  86. Stone, B.A. and Svensson, B. 2001. Enzyrnic depolymerisation and synthesis of polysaccharides. In: Glycoscience: Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/new York, in press.Google Scholar
  87. Street, I.P., Kempton, J.B. and Withers, S.G. 1992. Inactivation of a β-glucosidase through the accumulation of a stable 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-α-D-glucopyranosyl-enzyme intermediate: a detailed investigation. Biochemistry 31: 9970–9978.Google Scholar
  88. Smart, I.M., Loi, L. and Fincher, G.B. 1988. Varietal and environmental variations in (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucan levels and (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanase potential in barley: relationships to malting quality. J. Cereal Sci. 7: 61–71.Google Scholar
  89. Suganuma, T., Matsuno, R, Ohnishi, M. and Hiromi, K. 1978. A smdy of the mechanism of action of Taka-amylase A on linear oligosaccharides by product analysis and computer simulation. J. Biochem. 84: 293–316.Google Scholar
  90. Thoma, J.A., Brothers, C. and Spradlin, J. 1970. Subsite mapping of enzymes. Studies on Bacillus subtilis amylase. Biochemistry 9: 1768–1775.Google Scholar
  91. Thomas, B.R., Simmons, C.R Inouhe, M. and Nevins, D.J. 1998. Maize coleoptile endoglucanase is encoded by a novel gene family (Accession No. AF072326) (PGR98-143). Plant Physiol. 117: 1525.Google Scholar
  92. Thomas, B.R., Inouhe, M., Simmons, C.R. and Nevins, D.J. 2000. Endo-1,3;1,4-β-D-glucanase from coleoptiles of rice and maize: role in the regulation of plant growth. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 27: 145–149.Google Scholar
  93. Varghese, J.N., Garrett, T.P.J., Colman, P.M., Chen, L., Høj, P.B. and Fincher, G.B. 1994. Three-dimensional structures of two plant β-D-glucan endohydrolases with distinct substrate specificities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 2785–2789.Google Scholar
  94. Varghese, J.N., Hrmova, M. and Fincher, G.B. 1999. Three-dimensional structure of a barley β-D-glucan exohydrolase; a family 3 glycosyl hydrolase. Structure 7: 179–190.Google Scholar
  95. Viladot, J.L., de Ramon, E., Durany, O. and Planas, A 1998. Probing the mechanism of Bacillus 1,3–1,4-β-D-glucan 4-D-glucanohydrolases by chemical rescue of inactive mutants at catalytically essential residues. Biochemistry 37: 11332–11342.Google Scholar
  96. Vocadlo, D.J., Mayer, C., He, S. and Withers, S.G. 2000. Mechanism of action and identification of Asp242 as the catalytic nucleophile in Vibrio furnisii N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase using 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-5-fluoro-α-L-idopyranosyl fluoride. Biochemistry 39: 117–126.Google Scholar
  97. Wang, Q., Graharn, R.W., Trimbur, D., Warren, R.A.J. and Withers, S.G. 1994. Changing enzymatic reaction mechanisms by mutagenesis: conversion of a retaining glucosidases to an inverting enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116: 11594–11595.Google Scholar
  98. White, A. and Rose, D.R. 1997. Mechanism of catalysis by retaining β-glyeosyl hydrolases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 645–651.Google Scholar
  99. Withers, S.G., Dombroski, D., Berven, L.A, Kilburn, D.G., Miller, R.C. Jr., Warren, A.J. and Gilkes, N.R. 1986. Direct 1H N.M.R determination of the stereochemical course of hydrolyses catalysed by glucanase components of the cellulase complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 139: 487–494.Google Scholar
  100. Wolf, N. 1991. Complete nucleotide sequence of a Hordeum vulgare gene encoding (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucanase isoenzyme II. Plant Physiol. 96: 1382–1384.Google Scholar
  101. Wood, P.J. and Fulcher, R.G. 1978. Interaction of some dyes with cereal β-D-glucans. Cereal Chem. 55: 952–966.Google Scholar
  102. Wood, P.J., Weisz, J. and Blackwell, B.A. 1994. Structural studies of (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucans by 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and by rapid analysis of cellulose-like regions using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography of oligosaccharides released by lichenase. Cereal Chem. 71: 301–307.Google Scholar
  103. Woodward, J.R. and Fincher, G.B. 1982. Purification and chemical properties of two 1,3;1,4-β-D-glucan endohydrolases from germinated barley. Eur. J. Biochem. 121: 663–669.Google Scholar
  104. Woodward, J.R, Phillips, D.R. and Fincher, G.B. 1983. Water-soluble (1→3),(1→4)-β-D-glucans from barley (Hordeum vulgare) end’osperm. I. Physicochemical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers 3: 143–156.Google Scholar
  105. Zechel, D.L. and Withers, S.G. 1999. Glycosyl transferase mechanisms. In: D. Barton, K. Nakanishi, K. and C.D. Poulter (Eds.) Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry, Elsevier, New York, vol. 5, pp. 279–314.Google Scholar
  106. Zechel, D.L. and Withers, S.G. 2000. Glycosidase mechanisms: anatomy of a finely tuned catalyst. Ace. Chem. Res. 33: 11–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Hrmova
    • 1
  • Geoffrey B. Fincher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceUniversity of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations