Organising and Funding Research at a European Level

  • Anthony E. S. Mayer
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 266)

Abstract

It is difficult to organise research at a European level and the reasons for this are examined. Although an international collaborative activity, research is frequently perceived in nationalistic terms, primarily because it is viewed as leading directly to economic benefit. Despite this, a number of initiatives have been established at the European level since the 1950’s. Their history is somewhat erratic and is now dominated by the European Union’s Framework Programme.

Research infrastructures need to be considered at the European level and have been the reason behind many of the collaborative European developments in the past. They are essential for the development of research and are frequently beyond the capabilities of any single nation to finance them. Here, there is a clear case for a European approach. The problems of organising research at a European level arise from the complex structures which exist and the many conflicting interests. In addition, there is the paradox of science itself which is both collaborative and an intensely competitive activity. The case of the European Science Foundation demonstrates these difficulties in developing “European” research.

Finally, the proposal for a European Research Area is discussed with the conclusion that new structures are needed in Europe in order to support globally competitive basic research.

Keywords

Europe Ozone Turkey Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banda, E. 1999, Putting Science at the heart of Europe - The European Science Foundation’s next 25 years, European Review 7, 385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barré, R., Gibbons, M., Maddox, J., Martin, B. & Papon, P. (Eds.) 1997, Realignment of Research Systems: Science in Tomorrow’s Europe, Economica InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Busquin, Ph. 2000, Towards a European Research Area, European Commission - COM (2000)6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Europolis 2001, Four scenarios for Europe - Report of the Europolis Project La Lettre de l’OST 22 (special issue)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krige, J. & Guzzetti, L. (Eds.) 1997, History of European Scientific and Technological Cooperation European Science and Technology Forum, EC ReportsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin, B., Salter, A., Hicks,D., Pavitt, K., Senker, J., Sharp, M. & von Tunzelmann, N. 1996, The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance - a SPRU review for H.M. Treasury, SPRU Report (July 1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayer, A.E.S. 1998, 2017 - A science funding model for Europe, Science Funding - The European Dimension, Science and Society, Royal Society ReportGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nature 1998, Opinion, Nature 395, 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruberti, A. & André. M. 1995, Un espace européen de la science, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 185 pp. (ISBN 2130470793)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simmons, K. 2000, Why work together? (Editorial), Journal of Cell Science 113/44 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony E. S. Mayer
    • 1
  1. 1.European Science Foundation 1quai Lezay-MarnésiaStrasbourg CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations