Skip to main content

Selection Processes in Economics

  • Chapter
  • 213 Accesses

Part of the book series: Recent Economic Thought Series ((RETH,volume 74))

Abstract

The modern interest in selection processes within economic systems originated with([Alchian’s 1950]) intervention in the debate on the applicability of marginal analysis in economics. (The contributions to that debate which are referred to in this section have been rigorously examined by[Vromen,1995].) The critics, such as ([Harrod 1939]) and ([Lester 1946]), had argued that businessmen typically lacked the information necessary to make the calculations on which profit-maximizing actions could be based, and ([Machlup 1946]) had responded by claiming that experienced businessmen had developed the expertise which allowed them to maximize profits, just as experienced drivers developed the expertise which allowed them to overtake optimally. ([Machlup 1946,p.521]) then made the potentially fatal admission that “all the relevant magnitudes involved… are subjective” and may differ from those observed by outside analysts, without recognizing that even the explicit use of marginal analysis by businessmen may not then lead to the outcomes that the analysts would predict ([Vromen,1995,pp. 20-1]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. A. (1950): “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory”.Journal of Political Economy58:211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938):The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1962): “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory”.Journal of Political Economy70:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976):The Economic Approach to Human Behavior.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963):A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, P. E. (1986):Lifestyle Economics.Brighton: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, G. (1987):Technological Competition and Trade in the Experimentally Organized Economy.IUI Research Paper Report No. 32. Stockholm: IUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953): “The Methodology of Positive Economics”.Essays in Positive Economics.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, C. and Hoffman, R. F. (1995): “The Relevance of Strategy Research: Practitioner and Academic Viewpoints”.Journal of Management Studies32:575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. (1939): “Price and Cost in Entrepreneur’s Policy”.Oxford Economic Papers2:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1937): “Economics and Knowledge”.EconomicaN.S. 4:33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1952):The Sensory Order.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1962): “Rational Action and Economic Theory”.Journal ofPolitical Economy70:380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973):Competition and Entrepreneurship.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921):Risk Uncertainty and Profit.Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R, A. (1946): “Shortcomings of Marginal Theory for Wage-Employment Problems”.American Economic Review36:63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. (1976):Choice Complexity and Ignorance.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. (1996a): “The Imagined, Deemed Possible”. InBehavioral Norms Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics: Studies in Schumpeterian EconomicsHelmstadter, E. and Perlman, M. (eds.), Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J. (1996b): “The Division of Labor”.History of Economic Ideas3 (2–3):299–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1946): “Marginal Analysis and Empirical Research”.American Economic Review36:519–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920):Principles of Economics.8th edn. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982):An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1952): “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm”.American Economic Review42:804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pounds, W. F. (1969): “The Process of Problem Finding”.Industrial Management Review 11:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. (1960, 1990):Information and Investment. 1stand 2nd edns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. V. (1933):The Economics of Imperfect Competition.London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. B. and Hickson, D. J. (1995): “Success in Decision-Making: Different Organizations, Differing Reasons for Success”.Journal of Management Studies32:655–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983):The Diffiision of Innovations.3rd edn. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1965): “Adam Smith on the Division of Labor: Two Views or One?”EconomicaN. S. 23:127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1976):An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S., and Todd, W. B. eds. 2 volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. F. (1995): “Classifying Managerial Problems: An Empirical Study of Definitional Content”.Journal of Management Studies32:679–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vromen, J. J. (1995):Economic Evolution.London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loasby, B. (2001). Selection Processes in Economics. In: Dopfer, K. (eds) Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0648-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0648-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3869-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0648-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics