Abstract
In this short essay we explore a new approach to the study of economic growth, innovation and competition, compatible with the idea of an economy as an evolving, adaptive system. This offers the promise of new theoretical insights on economic processes, suggests new foci for empirical enquiry, and may offer new opportunities for the modelling of adaptive processes based on computational methods. The central problem posed in this approach is that of economic transformation and it is with transformation that growth becomes possible. Economic transformation has qualitative and quantitative dimensions and the interaction between the two is central to the evolutionary story. The qualitative dimension is closely connected with the process of innovation and the introduction of `new’ and the withdrawal of `old’ economic activities. The quantitative dimension is inseparable from ongoing processes of structural change in the economy. The link between the two is provided, I suggest, by a dynamic theory of innovation and competition as co-evolutionary processes.
I am grateful to Ronnie Ramlogan, Maria Derengowski Fonseca, Sally Randles and Bruce Tether for helpful discussion on the theme of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bailey, N.M., Hulten, C. and Campbell, D. (1992), `Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants’Brookings Papers Microeconomics187–267.
Baldwin, J.R. (1995)The Dynamics of Industrial Competition: A North American PerspectiveCambridge University Press.
Bartlesman, E.J. and Doms, M. (2000),Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata’, forthcomingJournal of Economic Literature
Brock, W.A. (1998), `Whither Nonlinear’mimeo.
Burns, A.F., (1938)Production Trends in the United States Since 1870NBER, Boston.
Carlsson, B., (1995)Technological Systems and Industrial DynamicsKluwer, Boston.
Depew, B. and D.J. Weber, (1995)Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural SelectionMIT Press.
Depew, B., and Weber, D.J. (1999), `Natural Selection and Self-Organisation’Biology and PhilosophyVo1 14 33–65
Dosi, G. (1997), `Opportunities, Incentives and the Collective Patterns of Technological Change’Economic JournalVol. 107, 1530–1547.
Edquist, C. (1996)Systems of InnovationPinter, London.
Eliasson G. (1996)Firm Objectives Control and OrganisationKluwer, Dordrecht.
Fisher, R.S., (1930)The Genetical Theory of Natural SelectionOxford University Press.
Foss, K. and Foss, N. (1999)Organising Economic Experiments: The Role of FirmsDRUID, WP No. 995,Copenhagen Business School.
Foster, J. (1993), `Economics and the Self-Organization Approach: Alfred Marshall Revisited’Economic JournalVol. 103, 975–991.
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J. and Krizan, C.J. (1998), `Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from the Micro Economic Evidence’, NBER, WP 6803, Cambridge.
Freeman, C. (1987)Technology Policy and Economic PerformancePinter, London.
Horan, B. (1995), ‘The Statistical Character of Evolutionary Theory’Philosophy of ScienceVol.61, 76–95.
Jones, C.I. (1995), `RanD-based Models of Economic Growth’Journal of Political EconomyVol.103, 759–804
Kaldor, N. (1934), `A Classificatory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium’Review of Economic StudiesVol.1, 122–136.
Kaldor, N. (1957), `A Model of Economic Growth’Economic JournalVo167.
Kuznets, S. (1929)Secular Movements of Production and PricesA. Kelly, (reprint) New York.
Loasby, B. (1999)Knowledge Institutions and Evolution in EconomicsRoutledge, London.
Machlup, F. (1962), `The Supply of Inventors and Inventions’, in Nelson, R., (ed.)The Rate and Direction of Inventive ActivityNBER, Boston.
Marshall, A. (1898)Industry and TradeMacmillan, London.
Mayr, E. (1982)The Growth of Biological ThoughtHarvard University Press.
Metcalfe, J.S., (1995), `The Design of Order: Notes on Evolutionary Principles and the Dynamics of Innovation’Revue EconomiqueVol. 46, 327–346.
Metcalfe, J.S., (1998)Evolutionary Economics and Creative DestructionRoutledge, London.Nelson, R. (1981), `Research on Productivity Differences: Dead Ends and New DeparturesJournal of Economic LiteratureVol. 18, 1029–1064.
Nelson, R. (1993)National Systems of InnovationHarvard University Press.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1974), `Neoclassical vs. Evolutionary Theories of Economic Growth: Critique and Prospectus’Economic JournalVol. 84, 886–905.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic ChangeBelknap, Harvard University Press.
Nelson, R. and Sampat, B.N. (1999), ‘Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Progress’mimeoColumbia University.
Polanyi, K., (1957), `The Economy as Instituted Process’ in Polanyi, K., Arunsberg, C., and Pearson, H.W.Trade and Markets in the Early EmpireFree Press, Glencoe.
Popper, K. (1985)A World of PropensitiesThoemmes, Bristol.
Prescott, E.C. (1998), `Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity’International Economic ReviewVol. 39, No. 3, 525–551.
Robbins, L. (1930), `On a Certain Ambiguity in the Conception of Stationary Equilibrium’The Economic JournalVol. 40, No. 158, 194–214.
Rosenberg, N. (1992), `Economic Experiments’Industrial and Corporate ChangeVol.!, 181–204.
Sober, E. (1984)The Nature of SelectionMIT Press, Boston.
Usher, D. (1980)The Measurement of Economic GrowthBasil Blackwell, Oxford.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Metcalfe, J.S. (2001). Evolutionary Approaches to Population Thinking and the Problem of Growth and Development. In: Dopfer, K. (eds) Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0648-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0648-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3869-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0648-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive