Skip to main content

Linking Insurance and Mitigation to Manage Natural Disaster Risk

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Insurance

Abstract

The insurance industry has suffered very large losses in the past 10 years from natural disasters and has the potential for experiencing even greater losses in the future. This chapter examines the role that insurance coupled with cost-effective risk mitigation measures (RMMs) can play in managing the risks from natural disasters. Large insurers have incentives to provide premium reductions to encourage RMMs if the allowable premiums are sufficiently high that they can pass the savings in losses to the property owner or if they are required to continue providing their current policyholders with coverage. Small insurers also have incentives to encourage their policyholders to adopt mitigation measures through premium reductions so as to reduce their chances of insolvency from a large-scale disaster. They may also want to consider purchasing reinsurance to cover a portion of their excess losses. Well-enforced building codes can complement insurance by forcing the adoption of cost-effective RMMs. They may be needed because many property owners underestimate the risks from disasters. In addition, mitigation measures not only reduce losses to the property itself but may produce positive externalities by reducing other costs of a disaster. The chapter concludes by outlining the roles that financial institutions, real estate developers and municipalities can play in developing incentives for the adoption of cost-effective RMMs and suggesting directions for future research.

Special thanks to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. I have benefited greatly from discussions with my colleagues from the Wharton Managing Catastrophic Risk Project on topics covered in the paper: Vivek Bantwal, Peter Burns, David Croson, David Cummins, Neil Doherty, Patricia Grossi, Robert Klein, Paul Kleindorfer, Robert Meyer and Tony Santomero. Partial support from NSF Grant # 524603 and the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center is gratefully acknowledged.Protions of the paper are based on an invited paper presented at the Fifth Alexander Howden (Australia) Conference on Disaster Insurabce, Gold Coast, August, 1997.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berger, L. and Kunreuther, H. (1994). “Safety First and Ambiguity” Journal of Actuarial Practice 2, 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. and Noll, R. (1981). “The Economics of Building Codes to Resist Seismic Structures” Public Policy Winter 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. (1988). “Risk Based Premiums for Insurance Guaranty Funds” Journal of Finance 43, 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G. and Eeckhoudt, L. (1985). “Self-Insurance, Self Protection and Increased Risk Aversion” Economic Letters 17, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, G. and Harrington, S., eds. (1992). Foundations of Insurance Economics (Kluwer: Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N. and Tinic, S.M. (1982). “A Note on Reinsurance under Conditions of Capital Market Equilibrium” Journal of Finance 36, 949–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (1998). Incentives and Impediments to Improving the Seismic Performance of Buildings. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I. and Becker, G. (1972). “Market Insurance, Self-Insurance and Self Protection” Journal of Political Economy 80, 623–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (1994). Assessment of the State-of-the Art Earthquake Loss Estimation Washington, D.C.: National Instiution of Building Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M. (1994). “A Survey of Insurance” The Economist 3–22, Dec. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz Center (1999). The Hidden Costs of Coastal Hazards Washington, D.C: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction (IBHS) (1995). Homes and Hurricanes: Public Opinion Concerning Various Issues Relating to Home Builders, Building Codes and Damage Mitigation Boston, MA: IBHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Research Council and Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction (1995). Coastal Exposure and Community Protection: Hurrican Andrew’s Legacy [Wheaton, Ill (IRC) and Boston (IBHS)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Services Office (1996). Managing Catastrophic Risk ( New York, N.Y.: Insurance Services Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleffner, A. and Doherty, N. (1996). “Costly Risk Bearing and the Supply of Catastrophic Insurance” Journal of Risk and Insurance 63, 567–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. (1998). “Regulation and Catastrophe Insurance” In H. Kunreuther and R. Roth, Sr., eds., Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. (1997). “The Regulation of Catastrophe Insurance: An Initial Overview” (mimeo) June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer, P. and Kunreuther, H. (1999). “Challenges Facing the Insurance Industry in Manag-ing Catastrophic Risks” Solutions“ in K.h Froot (ed) The Financing of Property/Casualty Risks (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. (1996). “Mitigating Disaster Losses Through Insurance”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 12, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. and Roth, R., Sr. (ed.) (1998). Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States (Washington, D.C: The Joseph Henry Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H. and Kleffner, A. E. (1992). “Should Earthquake Mitigation Measures Be Voluntary or Required?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4, 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, E. and Gahagan, K. (1998). “Hurricane Insurance Protection in Florida” In H. Kunreuther and R. Roth, Sr., eds., Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litan, R., Krimgold, F., Clark, K. and Khadilkar, J. (1992). Physical Damage and Human Loss: The Economic Impact of Earthquake Mitigation Measures (New York: Insurance Information Institute Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1976). “Moral Hazard” The American Economic Review 66, 880–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. and Stark, N.(1992). “Design Professions and Earthquake Policy” Earthquake Spectra 8, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, D. and Smith, C. (1982). “On Corporate Demand for Insurance” Journal of Business 55, 281–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, David and Smith, Clifford (1990). “On Corporate Demand for Insurance: Evidence from the Reinsurance Market” Journal of Business 63, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclsaac, D. and Babbel, D. (1995). The World Bank Primer on Reinsurance Washington, D.C.: USGPO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Reducing Earthquake Losses (Washington, D.C.: USGPO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasterick and Edward (1998). “The National Flood Insurance Program” In H. Kunreuther and R. Roth, Sr., eds., Paving the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, M. (1974). “Overinsurance and Public Provision of Insurance: The Role of Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. and Jaffee, D. (1997). “Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Insurable Risk” Journal of Risk and Insurance 64, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1979). “On Moral Hazard and Insurance” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. and Zeckhauser, R. (1971). “Insurance, Information and Individual Action” American Economic Review 61, 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. (1973). “A Theory of Capacity and the Insurance of Catastrophic Risks: Part I,” and “Part II,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 40, 231–243 (Part I) and 40, 339–355 (Part II).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunreuther, H. (2000). Linking Insurance and Mitigation to Manage Natural Disaster Risk. In: Dionne, G. (eds) Handbook of Insurance. Huebner International Series on Risk, Insurance, and Economic Security, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0642-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0642-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7911-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0642-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics