Skip to main content

Framing Our Thoughts: Ecological Rationality as Evolutionary Psychology’s Answer to the Frame Problem

  • Chapter
Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 27))

Abstract

Decision makers challenged by real-world adaptive problems must often select a course of action quickly, despite two computational obstacles: There is usually a vast number of possible courses of action that can be explored, and a similarly vast number of possible consequences that must be considered when evaluating these options. Thus, decision makers routinely face the frame problem: how to focus attention on adaptively relevant information and how to keep this information set small enough that the mind can actually perform the computations necessary to generate adaptive behavior. By identifying simple, effective heuristics that work within the computational and informational constraints of an organism and still result in adaptively adequate behavior, the new ecological rationality perspective within evolutionary psychology suggests how intelligent agents can overcome this frame problem. In this chapter we show how ecologically rational psychological mechanisms can address two challenges derived from the frame problem: 1) Using the example of sequential mate choice, we demonstrate that a satisficing information search strategy can lead to good decisions using only a limited amount of information; and 2) We argue that emotions can guide information search, by focusing the computational mind on precisely that information which is most useful for making decisions that lead to good outcomes over the long run.

We further describe how a bottom-up approach to studying ecological rationality, which first identifies simple heuristic decision-making components and then builds more sophisticated cognitive modules out of these components, can generate fruitful new directions for psychological scientists attempting to illuminate the structure of our evolved computational minds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J.A. 1997. “The Automaticity of Everyday Life”, in Wyer, R.S., ed., The Automaticity of Everyday Life: Advances in Social Cognition, vol. 10. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S., eds., 1995. Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. 1995. “Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science”, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, D.L. & Kukla, A. 1996. “Context Selection and the Frame Problem”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 529–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L. 1992. “Cognitive Phenomenology: The Role of Feelings in the Construction of Social Judgment”, in Tesser, A. & Martin, L.L., eds., The Construction of Social Judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 133–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G.L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. 1994. “Affective Causes and Consequences of Social Information Processing”, in Wyer, R.S. & Srull, T., eds., The Handbook of Social Cognition, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 323–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., & Rivest, R.L. 1997. Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. 1987. “From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link”, in Dupre, J., ed., The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A.R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. 1987. “Cognitive Wheels: The Frame Problem in AI”, in Pylyshyn, Z.W., ed., The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. 1996. “Producing Future by Telling Stories”, in Ford, K.M. & Pylyshyn, Z.W., eds., The Robo’s Dilemma Revisited: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • deSousa, R. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • deSousa, R. 1994. “Emotion”, in Guttenplan, S., ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. & Davidson, R.J. 1994. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1995. “Rationality and the Emotions”, The Economic Journal, 116, 1386–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, T.S. 1989. “Who solved the Secretary Problem?”, Statistical Science, 4, 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. 1995. “The Folly of Simulation”, in Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S., eds., Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 84–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, K.M. & Pylyshyn, Z.W. 1996. The Robot’s Dilemma Revisited: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., & The ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.P & Mosteller, F. 1966. “Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence”, American Statistical Association Journal, 61, 35–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, J. 1995. “Farewell to GOFAI?”, in Baumgartner, P. & Payr, S., eds., Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1987. “On the Emotions as Guarantors of Threats and Promises”, in Dupré, J., ed., The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Boston: Bradford Books-MIT Press, pp. 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 1999. “Objective Happiness”, in Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N., eds., Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasparov, G. 1997. Lessons in Chess. London: CadoganBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar, T. & Au, W.T. 2001. “The Role of Guilty Feelings in Cooperative Behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma: An Emotion-as-Information Interpretation of Frank’s (1988) Commitment Model”, unpublished manuscript, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar, T. & Clore, G.L. 1997. “Emotions and Reason: The Proximate Effects and Ultimate Functions of Emotions”, in Matthews, G., ed., Personality, Emotion, and Cognitive Science. Advances in Psychology Series, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland), pp. 355–396.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar, T. & Ellis, B.J. 2000. “Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science”, Psychological Inquiry, 77, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. 1997. Kasparov v. Deeper Blue: The Ultimate Man v. Machine Challenge. London: B.T. Batsford, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. & Hayes, P.J. 1969. “Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence”, in Meitzer, B. & Michie, D., eds., Machine Intelligence (Vol. 4). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 463–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.F. & Todd, P.M. 1998. “Mate Choice turns Cognitive”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F. 1987. Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions. New York: Dover. (Reprint of the 1965 Addison-Wesley edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. 1990. “Evolutionary Explanations of Emotions”, Human Nature, 1, 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. & Wilhams, G. 1994. Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newborn, M. 1996. Kasparov versus Deep Blue: Computer Chess Comes of Age. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., & Collins, A. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 1984. Visual Cognition: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio, T. 1984. “Vision by Man and Machine”, Scientific American, April, pp. 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z.W., ed., 1987. The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, E. 1994. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory (2nd Edition), Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redelmeier, D. & Kahneman, D. 1996. “Patients’ Memories of Painful Medical Treatments: Real-time and Retrospective Evaluations of Two Minimally Invasive Procedures”, Pain, 116, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. 1997. Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K.R. & Ekman, P., eds., 1984. Approaches to Emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. & Clore, G.L. 1983. “Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. & Clore, G.L. 1988. “How Do I Feel About It? Informative Functions of Affective States”, in Fiedler, K. & Forgas, J., eds., Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior. Toronto: Hogrefe International, pp. 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, CE. 1950. “Programming a Computer to Play Chess”, Philosophical Magazine, 41, 256–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1990. “Invariants of Human Behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.M. 2000. “The Ecological Rationality of Mechanisms Evolved to Make Up Minds”, American Behavioral Scientist (Special issue on evolutionary psychology), 43(6), 940–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.M., Fiddick, L., and Krauss, S. (in press). “Ecological Rationality and Its Contents”, Thinking and Reasoning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.M., Gigerenzer, G., & The ABC Research Group (in press). “How Can We Open Up the Adaptive Toolbox?” (Reply to commentaries), Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.M. & Miller, G.F. 1999. “From Pride and Prejudice to Persuasion: Realistic Heuristics for Mate Search”, in Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M. & The ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. 1990. “The Past Explains the Present: Emotional Adaptations and the Structure of Ancestral Environments”, Ethology and Sociobiology, 77, 375–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkielman, P., Zajonc, R. B., & Schwarz, N. 1997. “Subliminal Affective Priming Resists Attributional Interventions”, Cognition & Emotion, 11, 433–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ketelaar, T., Todd, P.M. (2001). Framing Our Thoughts: Ecological Rationality as Evolutionary Psychology’s Answer to the Frame Problem. In: Holcomb, H.R. (eds) Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3890-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0618-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics