Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Selection, Good Genes, and Human Mating

  • Chapter
Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 27))

Abstract

Sexual selection is selection due to differential access to quantity and quality of mates. One form of it, intersexual selection, is due to differential access to mates driven by the mate preferences of individuals of the other sex. The major question about sexual selection pursued in theoretical investigation during the past two decades is, what accounts for mate preferences that drive intersexual selection? Several plausible models have been developed, one or more of which may apply to any particular species. This chapter has two major aims. First, evolutionary psychologists are interested in the linked tasks of inferring historical selection pressures that shaped psychological adaptations governing behavior, and describing the nature of those adaptations. Williams (1966) proposed that the criterion for inferring selection pressures, and thereby identifying adaptations that resulted, is special design. The logic of Williams’ approach is briefly described. Second, one particular process of interest is good genes sexual selection. This form of sexual selection occurs when members of one sex (I focus here on females) prefer as sexual mates individuals who possess markers of good genes, whose gametes benefit the chooser’s offspring. The criterion of special design applied to good genes sexual selection is: Are there any features of female mate choice that possess special design for choosing mates for their gametes, such that it is unlikely that such features would have evolved were they not designed by selection for this function? After discussing relevant background theory, I present several lines of evidence that are suggestive of such special design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersson, M.B. 1982. “Female Choice Selects for Extreme Tail Length in a Widowbird”, Nature, 299, 818–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M.B. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R.R. & Bellis, M.A. 1995. Human Sperm Competition: Copulation, Masturbation, and Infidelity. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis, M.A. & Baker, R.R. 1990. “Do Females Promote Sperm Competition? Data for Humans”, Animal Behaviour, 40, 997–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. 1986. “Sexual Selection for Aesthetic Traits in Species with Biparental Care”, American Naturalist, 127, 415–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, A. 1995. “Perspective: The Evolution of Fitness”, Evolution, 49, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. & Schmitt, D.P. 1993. “Sexual Strategies Theory: A Contextual Evolutionary Analysis of Human Mating”, Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., Simpson, J.A., & Orina, M. (in press). “Sex and Mating: Sexual Strategies, Trade-offs, and Strategic Pluralism”, in Rosen, D. & Luebbert, M., eds., Evolution of the Psyche. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1987. “The Heritability of Fitness”, in Bradbury, J.W. & Andersson, M.B., eds., Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. New York: Wiley, pp. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. 1990. “Mutation-selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination”, Genetical Research, 55, 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. & Hughes, K.A. 1998. “The Maintenance of Genetic Variation in Life History Traits”, in Singh, R.S. & Krimbas, C.B., eds., Evolutionary Genetics from Molecules to Morphology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H. 1991. The Ant and the Peacock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F. 1986. Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative, and Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B.J. 1998. “The Partner-specific Investment Inventory: An Evolutionary Approach to Individual Differences in Investment”, Journal of Personality, 66, 383–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon. (Also, 1958, New York: Dover)

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, L.S. 1997. “The Evolutionary Biology of Spontaneous Abortion in Humans”, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 446–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlow, B., Armijo-Prewitt, T., Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. 1997. “Fluctuating Asymmetry and Psychometric Intelligence”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264, 823–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlow, B., Gangestad, S.W., & Armijo-Prewitt, T. 1998. “Developmental Stability and Human Violence”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W., Bennett, K., & Thornhill, R. (in press). “A Latent Variable Model of the Developmental Instability in Relation to Men’s Sexual Behavior”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W., Simpson, J.A., Cousins, A.J., & Christensen, N.P. 1998. “Fluctuating Asymmetry, Sociosexuality, and Women’s Context-specific Mate Preferences”, manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. 1997a. “Human Sexual Selection and Developmental Stability”, in Simpson, J.A. & Kenrick, D.T., eds., Evolutionary Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 169–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. 1997b. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Extra-pair Sex: The Role of Fluctuating Asymmetry”, Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. 1998a. “An Evolutionary Psychological Analysis of Human Sexual Selection: Developmental Stability, Male Sexual Behavior, and Mediating Features”, manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. 1998b. “Menstrual Cycle Variation in Women’s Preference for the Scent of Symmetrical Men”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 727–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W, & Thornhill, R. 1998c. “Sexual Selection and Relationship Dynamics: Trade-offs Between Partner Investment and Fluctuating Asymmetry”, manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. 2001. “Facial Masculinity and Fluctuating Asymmetry”, manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. (in press). “Fluctuating Asymmetry, Developmental Instability, and Fitness: Toward Model-based Interpretation”, in Polak, M., ed., Developmental Instability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Thornhill, R. (in press). “Individual Differences in Developmental Precision and Fluctuating Asymmetry: A Model and Its Implications”, Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R.A. 1994. “Facial Attractiveness, Developmental Stability, and Fluctuating Asymmetry”, Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S.W. & Simpson, J.A. 2000. “The Evolution of Human Mating: The Role of Trade-offs and Strategic Pluralism”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 575–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205, 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. 1990. “Biological Signals as Handicaps”, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, 517–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, K. 1993. “5-a-androst-16en-3a-on: A Male Pheromone? A Brief Report”, Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. 1990. “Brood Reduction and Optimal Parental Investment When Offspring Differ in Quality”, American Naturalist, 136, 550–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig, D. 1993. “Genetic Conflicts in Human Pregnancy”, Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 495–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgrimsson, B. 1998. “Fluctuating Asymmetry in the Mammalian Skeleton: Evolutionary and Developmental Implications”, in Hecht, M.K., ed., Evolutionary Biology, v. 30. New York: Plenum, pp. 187–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. 1982. “Pathogens as Causes of Genetic Diversity in Their Host Populations”, in Anderson, R.M. & May, R.M., eds., Population Biology of Infectious Diseases. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. & Zuk, M. 1982. “Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites”, Science, 218, 384–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, R.S. & Cahill, E.D. 1997. “Differential Use of Sensory Information in Sexual Behavior as a Function of Gender”, Human Nature, 8, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, H.R. 1993. Sociobiology, Sex, and Science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, H.R. 1996. “Just So Stories and Inference to the Best Explanation in Evolutionary Psychology”, Minds and Machines, 6, 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1998. “Chase-away Sexual Selection: Antagonistic Seduction Versus Resistance”, Evolution, 52, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houle, D. 1992. “Comparing Evolvability and Variability of Traits”, Genetics, 130, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S.B. 1981. The Woman That Never Evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S.B. 1997. “Raising Darwin’s Consciousness: Female Sexuality and the Prehominid Origins of Patriarchy”, Human Nature, 8, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. “Why Do Females Mate Multiply? A Review of the Genetic Benefits”, Biological Review, 75, 21–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, V.S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (in press). “Male Facial Attractiveness: Evidence for Hormone Medicated Adaptive Design”, Evolution and Human Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1986. “The Handicap Mechanism of Sexual Selection Does Not Work”, American Naturalist, 127, 222–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. “Good Genes and Direct Selection in the Evolution of Mating Preferences”, Evolution, 50, 2125–2140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M.J. 1991. “The Evolution of Mating Preferences and the Paradox of the Lek”, Nature, 350, 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, B. & Forbes, M.R. 1996. “Fluctuating Asymmetry in Relation to Stress and Fitness: Effects of Trait Type as Revealed by Meta-analysis”, Ecoscience, 3, 400–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, J.D. & Zwartjes, P.W. 1995. “Ornate Plumage of Male Red Junglefowl Does Not Influence Mate Choice by Females”, Animal Behaviour, 49, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1983. “How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Programme?”, American Naturalist, 121, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. 1994. Sexual Selection in the Barn Swallow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. 1997. “Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review”, American Naturalist, 149, 916–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. 1999. “Asymmetry as a Predictor of Growth, Fecundity and Survival”, Ecology Letters, 2, 149–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. & Swaddle, J.P. 1997. Developmental Stability and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. & Thornhill, R. 1997a. “A Meta-analysis of the Heritability of Developmental Stability”, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. & Thornhill, R. 1997b. “Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta-analysis”, American Naturalist, 151, 174–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, A.P. & Thornhill, R. 1998. “Male Parental Care, Differential Parental Investment by Females and Sexual Selection”, Animal Behaviour, 55, 1507–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. & Maynard Smith, J. 1991. “Optimaliry Theory in Evolutionary Biology”, Nature, 348, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. & McNair, M.R. 1978. “Models of Parent-offspring Conflict: I. Monogamy”, Animal Behaviour, 26, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, L. 1983. “Non-random Mating and Offspring Fitness”, in Bateson, P., ed., Mate Choice. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I.S., Little, A.C., Baker, S., Tiddeman, B., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D.I. (in press). “Male Facial Attractiveness: No Evidence for a Trait Size/Symmetry Correlation”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I.S. & Perrett, D.I. 1998, June. “Effects of Exaggerated Femininity and Masculinity on Facial Attractiveness”, paper presented at the annual meetings of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Davis, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I.S. & Perrett, D.I. 2000. “Female Preference for Male Faces Changes Cyclically—Further Evidence”, Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak, I.S., Perrett, D.I., Castles, D., Burt, M., Koyabashi, T., & Murray, L.K. 1999. “Female Preference for Male Faces Changes Cyclically”, Nature, 399, 741–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M. & Kempanaers, B. 1998. “Extra-pair Paternity in Birds: Explaining Variation Between Species and Populations”, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A.P. 1995. “A Resolution of the Lek Paradox”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 260, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. & Schuler, D. 1991. “On the Low Heritability of Life History Traits”, Evolution, 45, 853–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski, A. & Grammer, K. 1999. “Human Body Odour, Symmetry and Attractiveness”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 869–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996. “The Lek Paradox and the Capture of Genetic Variance by Condition Dependent Traits”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 1415–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheib, J.E., Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. 1999. “Facial Attractiveness, Symmetry, and Cues of Good Genes”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 1318–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.A. & Gangestad, S.W. 1991. “Individual Differences in Socio-sexuality: Evidence for Convergent and Discriminant Validity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.A., Gangestad, S.W., Christensen, P.N., & Leck, K. (in press). “Fluctuating Asymmetry, Sociosexuality, and Intrasexual Competitive Tactics”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L. 1984. “Human Sperm Competition”, in Smith, R.L., ed., Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Human Mating Systems. London: Academic, pp. 601–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. 1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D. & Williams, G.C. 1982. “The Lek Paradox is Not Resolved”, Theoretical Population Biology, 22, 392–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, R.J., Yeo, R.A., Gangestad, S.W., Lewine, J., & Davis, J. (in press). “Fluctuating Asymmetry and the Human Brain”, Laterality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. 1991. “The Study of Adaptation”, in Bekoff, M. & Jamieson, D., eds., Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S.W. 1994. “Fluctuating Asymmetry and Human Sexual Behavior”, Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S.W. 1999b. “The Scent of Symmetry: A Human Pheromone That Signals Fitness?” Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S.W., & Comer, R. 1995. “Human Female Orgasm and Mate Fluctuating Asymmetry”, Animal Behaviour, 50, 1601–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. & Moller, A.P. 1997. “Developmental Stability, Disease and Medicine”, Biological Reviews, 72, 497–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1972. “Parental Investment and Sexual Selection”, in Campbell, B., ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1974. “Parent-offspring Conflict”, American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. 1985. Social Evolution. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D. 1998. “Fluctuating Asymmetry and Human Male Life History Traits in Rural Belize”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 255, 1497–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1975. Sex and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, R. & Gangestad, S.W. 1998. “Developmental Instability and Phenotypic Variation in Neural Organization”, in Raz, N., ed., The Other Side of the Error Term: Aging and Development as Models in Cognitive Neuroscience. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Mexico, USA

    Steven W. Gangestad

Authors
  1. Steven W. Gangestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA

    Harmon R. Holcomb III

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gangestad, S.W. (2001). Sexual Selection, Good Genes, and Human Mating. In: Holcomb, H.R. (eds) Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3890-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0618-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation