Abstract
Increasingly serious attention is being paid to the quality of learning and teaching in higher education. This is a global concern, associated with calls for greater accountability and efficiency, increases in the size and diversity of the student population and a relative decline in the real value of funds available for higher education. Teaching in higher education is having to become more professional. Agencies are being set up in a number of countries, charged with supporting and/or accrediting the development of teaching competences. (See, for example, the work of the Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in the United Kingdom.) Faculty are paying greater attention to their teaching and to finding ways of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the support they provide to students. Universities are shifting budgets towards the improvement of learning and teaching and are strengthening the roles of faculty developers. There is a growing stream of practical books, aimed at guiding both new and experienced university teachers (e.g. Beard & Hartley, 1987; Biggs, 1999; Brown & Atkins, 1988; Brown, Bull & Pendlebury, 1997; Brown & Knight, 1994; Gibbs & Jenkins, 1992; Hativa, 2000; Laurillard, 1993; McKeachie, 1999; Prosser & Trigwell, 1999; Race & Brown, 1993; Ramsden, 1992). These shifts are creating a demand for a better research-based understanding of the nature of teaching in higher education. This research field is still immature, though it is now beginning to develop very rapidly, as a comparison between the early reviews of (1963) or (1986) and the references cited within the chapters of this book will quickly reveal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beard, R., & Hartley, J. (1987). Teaching and learning in higher education. (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman.
Berliner, D. C., & Carter, K. J. (1989). Differences in processing classroom information by expert and novice teachers. In J. Lowyck & C. Clark (Eds), Teacher thinking and professional action. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Routledge.
Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision making. London: Holt.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cross, P. K. (1991). College teaching: What do we know about it? Innovative Higher Education, 16(1), 7–21.
Day, C., Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.) (1990). Insight into teachers’ thinking and practice. London: Falmer.
de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113.
Dunkin, M., & Barnes, J. (1986). Research on teaching in higher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.,). New York: MacMillan.
Ericsson, K., & Smith, J. (Eds.) (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (1992). Disciplinary differences: Instructional goals and activities, measures of student performance, and student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (Eds.) (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
Goodyear, P. (Ed.) (1991). Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Hativa, N. (1997). Teaching in a research university: Professors’ conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Hativa, N. (2000). Teaching for effective learning in higher education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83.
Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95.
Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning skills or skill in learning. In J. Richardson, M. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 198–207). Buckingham: Open University Press.
McKeachie, W. J. (1963). Research on teaching at the college and university level. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1118–1172). Chicago: Rand McNally.
McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mitchell, C, & Weber, S. (1999). Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. London: Falmer
Peterson, P., & Clark, C. (1978). Teachers’ reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 555–565.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Race, P., & Brown, S. (1993). 500 tips for tutors, London: Kogan Page.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (1995). Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 49–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching. A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.
Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100–123). London: Falmer.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodyear, P., Hativa, N. (2002). Introduction. In: Hativa, N., Goodyear, P. (eds) Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0095-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0593-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive