Skip to main content

Introduction

Research on teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education

  • Chapter
Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education

Abstract

Increasingly serious attention is being paid to the quality of learning and teaching in higher education. This is a global concern, associated with calls for greater accountability and efficiency, increases in the size and diversity of the student population and a relative decline in the real value of funds available for higher education. Teaching in higher education is having to become more professional. Agencies are being set up in a number of countries, charged with supporting and/or accrediting the development of teaching competences. (See, for example, the work of the Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in the United Kingdom.) Faculty are paying greater attention to their teaching and to finding ways of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the support they provide to students. Universities are shifting budgets towards the improvement of learning and teaching and are strengthening the roles of faculty developers. There is a growing stream of practical books, aimed at guiding both new and experienced university teachers (e.g. Beard & Hartley, 1987; Biggs, 1999; Brown & Atkins, 1988; Brown, Bull & Pendlebury, 1997; Brown & Knight, 1994; Gibbs & Jenkins, 1992; Hativa, 2000; Laurillard, 1993; McKeachie, 1999; Prosser & Trigwell, 1999; Race & Brown, 1993; Ramsden, 1992). These shifts are creating a demand for a better research-based understanding of the nature of teaching in higher education. This research field is still immature, though it is now beginning to develop very rapidly, as a comparison between the early reviews of (1963) or (1986) and the references cited within the chapters of this book will quickly reveal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beard, R., & Hartley, J. (1987). Teaching and learning in higher education. (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C., & Carter, K. J. (1989). Differences in processing classroom information by expert and novice teachers. In J. Lowyck & C. Clark (Eds), Teacher thinking and professional action. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Atkins, M. (1988). Effective teaching in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1994). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1984). Teachers’ classroom decision making. London: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, P. K. (1991). College teaching: What do we know about it? Innovative Higher Education, 16(1), 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (Eds.) (1990). Insight into teachers’ thinking and practice. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkin, M., & Barnes, J. (1986). Research on teaching in higher education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed.,). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K., & Smith, J. (Eds.) (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (1992). Disciplinary differences: Instructional goals and activities, measures of student performance, and student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (Eds.) (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, P. (Ed.) (1991). Teaching knowledge and intelligent tutoring, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (1997). Teaching in a research university: Professors’ conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hativa, N. (2000). Teaching for effective learning in higher education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning skills or skill in learning. In J. Richardson, M. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 198–207). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1963). Research on teaching at the college and university level. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1118–1172). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J. (1999). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C, & Weber, S. (1999). Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. London: Falmer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, P., & Clark, C. (1978). Teachers’ reports of their cognitive processes during teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 555–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education, Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, P., & Brown, S. (1993). 500 tips for tutors, London: Kogan Page.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C., & Ethington, C. A. (1995). Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals. In N. Hativa & M. Marincovich (Eds.), Disciplinary differences in teaching and learning: Implications for practice (pp. 49–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching. A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yinger, R., & Hendricks-Lee, M. (1993). Working knowledge in teaching. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 100–123). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodyear, P., Hativa, N. (2002). Introduction. In: Hativa, N., Goodyear, P. (eds) Teacher Thinking, Beliefs and Knowledge in Higher Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0593-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0095-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0593-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics