Advertisement

Blurring Boundaries and Blistering Institutions: An Introduction

  • Jürgen Enders
  • Oliver Fulton
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 1)

Abstract

“Internationalisation” and “globalisation” became key themes in the 1990s, both in higher education policy debates and in research on higher education. Higher education policy is still predominantly shaped at a national level; and as such, it still tends not only to reflect but to underscore the specific traditions and circumstances of individual countries. However, a number of different trends, many of which can be grouped together under the general heading of “internationalisation”, have begun to challenge the predominance of the nation state as the main determinant of the character of universities and colleges, and of the experiences of their students, their graduates and those who work in them. Internationalisation is contributing to, if not leading, a process of rethinking the social, cultural and economic roles of higher education and their configuration in national systems of higher education.

Keywords

High Education High Education System High Education Research High Education Policy Bologna Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. & Teichler, U. (2001). “Internationalization and Exchanges in a Globalized University”. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barblan, A., Reichert, M., Schotte-Kmoch, M. & Teichler, U. (2000). Implementing European Policies in Higher Education Institutions. Kassel: Centre for Research on Higher Education and Work (Werkstattberichte: 57).Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1996). “Das Zeitalter der Nebenfolgen und die Politisierung der Moderne”. In Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (eds.) Reflexive Modernisierung. Eine Kontroverse. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 19–112.Google Scholar
  4. Blumenthal, P., Goodwin, C., Smith, A. & Teichler U. (eds.) (1996). Academic Mobility in a Changing World. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2001). “Universities as Dynamic Systems of Contradictory Functions”. In Muller, Johan, Cloete, N. & Badat, S. (eds.) Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 206–223.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, B. R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Daniel, H.-D., Schwarz, S. & Teichler, U. (1999). “Study Costs, Student Income and Public Policy in Europe”. European Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dill, D. D. & Sporn, B. (1995). “The Implications of a Postindustrial Environment”. In Dill, D. D. and Sporn, B. (eds.) Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Enders, J. & Teichler, U. (1995). Der Hochschullehrerberuf im internationalen Vergleich. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie.Google Scholar
  10. Enders, J. (2002). “Higher Education, Internationalisation, and the Nation State”. German Policy Studies, 2, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Guillén, M. F. (2001). “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature”. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gumport, P. (2000). “Academic Restructuring: Organisational Change and Institutional Imperatives”. Higher Education, 9, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kälvermark, T. & Wende, M. C. van der (eds.) (1997). National Policies for Internationalisation of Higher Education in Europe. Stockholm: National Agency for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Kwiek, M. (2000). “The Nation-State, Globalisation and the Modern Institution of the University.” Theo-ria, 6 (December), 74–98.Google Scholar
  15. Maassen, Peter (ed.) (2000). Higher Education and the Stakeholder Society. European Journal of Education, 5(4) (special issue).Google Scholar
  16. Moja, T. & Cloete, N. (2001). “Vanishing Borders and New Boundaries”. In Muller, J., Cloete, N. & Badat, S. (eds.) Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 244–270.Google Scholar
  17. Neave, G. (2000). “Introduction. Universities’ Responsibility to Society: An Historical Exploration of an Enduring Issue”. In Neave, G. (ed.) The Universities’ Responsibilities to Society. International Perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon, 1–28.Google Scholar
  18. Newton, I. (1676). “Letter to Robert Hooke, 5 February 1676”. In Turnbull, H. W. (ed.) (1959). Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton, Vol. 1, 416.Google Scholar
  19. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, P. (ed.) (1998). The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures. An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Teichler, U. (1991). Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System. The Experience of Three Decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  23. Teichler, U. (1996). “Comparative Higher Education: Potentials and Limits”. Higher Education, 2(4), 431–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teichler, U. (1998). “The Role of the European Union in the Intemationalisation of Higher Education”. In Scott, P. (ed.) The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 88–99.Google Scholar
  25. Teichler, U. (1999). “Intemationalisation as a Challenge for Higher Education in Europe”. Tertiary Education and Management, 5(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Teichler, U. (2001). “Changes of ERASMUS under the Umbrella of SOCRATES”. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(2), 201–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuijnman, A. & Schuller, T. (eds.) (1999). Lifelong Learning Policy and Research. London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wende, M. C. van der (2002). “Intemationalisation Policies: About New Trends and Contrasting Paradigms”. Higher Education Policy, in press.Google Scholar
  29. Wittrock, B. (1993). “The Modern University: the Three Transformations”. In Rothblatt, S. & Wittrock, B. (eds.) The European and American University since 1800. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 298–314.Google Scholar
  30. Wolf, C. Jr. (1988). Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Enders
  • Oliver Fulton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations