Abstract
“Internationalisation” and “globalisation” became key themes in the 1990s, both in higher education policy debates and in research on higher education. Higher education policy is still predominantly shaped at a national level; and as such, it still tends not only to reflect but to underscore the specific traditions and circumstances of individual countries. However, a number of different trends, many of which can be grouped together under the general heading of “internationalisation”, have begun to challenge the predominance of the nation state as the main determinant of the character of universities and colleges, and of the experiences of their students, their graduates and those who work in them. Internationalisation is contributing to, if not leading, a process of rethinking the social, cultural and economic roles of higher education and their configuration in national systems of higher education.
Internationalisation of higher education can be viewed as a trend: unresistable, as those who resist fall behind. Or it can viewed as a challenge, which might or might not be taken up, and which might be taken up differently. (Teichler 1999: 21)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Altbach, P. G. & Teichler, U. (2001). “Internationalization and Exchanges in a Globalized University”. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 5–25.
Barblan, A., Reichert, M., Schotte-Kmoch, M. & Teichler, U. (2000). Implementing European Policies in Higher Education Institutions. Kassel: Centre for Research on Higher Education and Work (Werkstattberichte: 57).
Beck, U. (1996). “Das Zeitalter der Nebenfolgen und die Politisierung der Moderne”. In Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (eds.) Reflexive Modernisierung. Eine Kontroverse. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 19–112.
Blumenthal, P., Goodwin, C., Smith, A. & Teichler U. (eds.) (1996). Academic Mobility in a Changing World. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Castells, M. (2001). “Universities as Dynamic Systems of Contradictory Functions”. In Muller, Johan, Cloete, N. & Badat, S. (eds.) Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 206–223.
Clark, B. R. (1998) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Daniel, H.-D., Schwarz, S. & Teichler, U. (1999). “Study Costs, Student Income and Public Policy in Europe”. European Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–22.
Dill, D. D. & Sporn, B. (1995). “The Implications of a Postindustrial Environment”. In Dill, D. D. and Sporn, B. (eds.) Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Enders, J. & Teichler, U. (1995). Der Hochschullehrerberuf im internationalen Vergleich. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie.
Enders, J. (2002). “Higher Education, Internationalisation, and the Nation State”. German Policy Studies, 2, in press.
Guillén, M. F. (2001). “Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature”. Annual Review of Sociology, 7, 235–260.
Gumport, P. (2000). “Academic Restructuring: Organisational Change and Institutional Imperatives”. Higher Education, 9, 67–91.
Kälvermark, T. & Wende, M. C. van der (eds.) (1997). National Policies for Internationalisation of Higher Education in Europe. Stockholm: National Agency for Higher Education.
Kwiek, M. (2000). “The Nation-State, Globalisation and the Modern Institution of the University.” Theo-ria, 6 (December), 74–98.
Maassen, Peter (ed.) (2000). Higher Education and the Stakeholder Society. European Journal of Education, 5(4) (special issue).
Moja, T. & Cloete, N. (2001). “Vanishing Borders and New Boundaries”. In Muller, J., Cloete, N. & Badat, S. (eds.) Challenges of Globalisation. South African Debates with Manuel Castells. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman, 244–270.
Neave, G. (2000). “Introduction. Universities’ Responsibility to Society: An Historical Exploration of an Enduring Issue”. In Neave, G. (ed.) The Universities’ Responsibilities to Society. International Perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon, 1–28.
Newton, I. (1676). “Letter to Robert Hooke, 5 February 1676”. In Turnbull, H. W. (ed.) (1959). Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton, Vol. 1, 416.
Sassen, S. (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scott, P. (ed.) (1998). The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures. An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Teichler, U. (1991). Changing Patterns of the Higher Education System. The Experience of Three Decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Teichler, U. (1996). “Comparative Higher Education: Potentials and Limits”. Higher Education, 2(4), 431–465.
Teichler, U. (1998). “The Role of the European Union in the Intemationalisation of Higher Education”. In Scott, P. (ed.) The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, 88–99.
Teichler, U. (1999). “Intemationalisation as a Challenge for Higher Education in Europe”. Tertiary Education and Management, 5(1), 5–23.
Teichler, U. (2001). “Changes of ERASMUS under the Umbrella of SOCRATES”. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(2), 201–227.
Tuijnman, A. & Schuller, T. (eds.) (1999). Lifelong Learning Policy and Research. London: Portland Press.
Wende, M. C. van der (2002). “Intemationalisation Policies: About New Trends and Contrasting Paradigms”. Higher Education Policy, in press.
Wittrock, B. (1993). “The Modern University: the Three Transformations”. In Rothblatt, S. & Wittrock, B. (eds.) The European and American University since 1800. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 298–314.
Wolf, C. Jr. (1988). Markets or Governments: Choosing Between Imperfect Alternatives. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Enders, J., Fulton, O. (2002). Blurring Boundaries and Blistering Institutions: An Introduction. In: Enders, J., Fulton, O. (eds) Higher Education in a Globalising World. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0579-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0579-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0864-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0579-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive