Skip to main content

Agent-Dependent Metonymy in a Context-Change Model of Communication

  • Chapter
  • 199 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 77))

Abstract

A well-known problem in the semantic interpretation of natural language is presented by the use of referring expressions to not directly point at their intended referents, but at some associated object. Examples are:

  1. (1)

    I’m reading Shakespeare.

  2. (2)

    The London office called.

  3. (3)

    John works for this newspaper

  4. (4)

    Turn up the radio.

  5. (5)

    The buses are on strike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahn, R. (2000) Agents, Object and Events. A computational approach to knowledge, observation and communication. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, R. and Borghuis, T. (1997) Communication Modelling and Context-Dependent Interpretation: An Integrated Approach. In A. Benz and G. Jäger (eds) Proceedings of Mundial ′97, Munich, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, R. & Kolb, H.R (1990) Discourse Representation Meets Constructive Mathematics. In: L. Kaiman & L. Polos (eds.) Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barendregt, H. (1991) Introduction to Generalized Type Systems. Journal of Functional Programming, 1(2). 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghuis, T. (1994) Coming to terms with modal logic: on the interpretation of modalities in typed λ-calculus. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, E., Copestake, A. and Boguraev, B. (1990) Enjoy the paper: lexical semantics via lexicology. In Proc. of the 13 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING-90,q 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittanica, Encyclopedia (2000) http://www.brittanica.com/seo/metonymy

  • De Bruijn, N.G. (1980) A survey of the project Automath. In: Seldin & Hindley (eds.) To H.B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalisms. Academic Press. 579–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.C. (1989) Information dialogues as communicative action in relation to partner modeling and information processing. In: M.M. Taylor, F. Néel & D.G. Bouwhuis (eds.) The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.C. (2000) Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. In: H.C. Bunt & W.J. Black (eds.) Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue, Studies in Computational Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 81–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H.C. Ahn, R., Kievit, L.A., Piwek, P., Verlinden, M., Beun, R.J., Borghuis, T. & Overveld, C. van (1998) Multimodal cooperation with the DenK System. In: H.C. Bunt, R.J. Beun, & T. Borghuis (eds.) Multimodal Human-Computer Communication. Berlin: Springer, 39–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, A. and Briscoe, E. (1995) Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12(1), 15–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coquand, T. and Huet, G. (1988) The calculus of constructions. Information and Computation 76, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D. & Martin, P. (1993) Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63, 69–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J.R. (2001) Syntax and Metonymy. In: P. Bouillon & F. Busa (eds.) The Language of Word Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 290–311. Also available at http://www.ai.sri.com/hobbs/metsyn/metsyn.html.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, L. (1998) Context-driven Natural Language Interpretation. Ph.D. Thesis, Tilburg University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kievit, L., P. Piwek, R.J. Beun & H.C. Bunt (2001) Multimodal Cooperative Resolution of Referential Expressions in the DENK system. In H. Bunt & R.J. Beun (eds.) Multimodal Generation, Interpretation and Cooperation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2155. Berlin: Springer, 202–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, A. and A. Copestake (1998) Pragmatics and Word Meaning. Journal of Linguistics 34, 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf P. (1984) Intuitionistic Type Theory. Naples: Bibliopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederpelt, R., Geuvers, H. and de Vrijer, R. (1994) (eds.) Selected Papers on Automath. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 133, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G. (1979) The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(1), 143–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, G. (1995) Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1993) Type Coercion and Lexical Selection. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.) Semantics and the Lexicon, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 49, 73–94, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspoor, C. (1997) Conventionality-Governed Logical Metonymy. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg 1997, 300–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunt, H., Kievit, L. (2001). Agent-Dependent Metonymy in a Context-Change Model of Communication. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R., Thijsse, E. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0572-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics