Abstract
A well-known problem in the semantic interpretation of natural language is presented by the use of referring expressions to not directly point at their intended referents, but at some associated object. Examples are:
-
(1)
I’m reading Shakespeare.
-
(2)
The London office called.
-
(3)
John works for this newspaper
-
(4)
Turn up the radio.
-
(5)
The buses are on strike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahn, R. (2000) Agents, Object and Events. A computational approach to knowledge, observation and communication. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Ahn, R. and Borghuis, T. (1997) Communication Modelling and Context-Dependent Interpretation: An Integrated Approach. In A. Benz and G. Jäger (eds) Proceedings of Mundial ′97, Munich, 1997.
Ahn, R. & Kolb, H.R (1990) Discourse Representation Meets Constructive Mathematics. In: L. Kaiman & L. Polos (eds.) Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 105–124.
Barendregt, H. (1991) Introduction to Generalized Type Systems. Journal of Functional Programming, 1(2). 125–154.
Borghuis, T. (1994) Coming to terms with modal logic: on the interpretation of modalities in typed λ-calculus. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Briscoe, E., Copestake, A. and Boguraev, B. (1990) Enjoy the paper: lexical semantics via lexicology. In Proc. of the 13 th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING-90,q 42–47.
Brittanica, Encyclopedia (2000) http://www.brittanica.com/seo/metonymy
De Bruijn, N.G. (1980) A survey of the project Automath. In: Seldin & Hindley (eds.) To H.B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, Lambda Calculus and Formalisms. Academic Press. 579–606.
Bunt, H.C. (1989) Information dialogues as communicative action in relation to partner modeling and information processing. In: M.M. Taylor, F. Néel & D.G. Bouwhuis (eds.) The Structure of Multimodal Dialogue. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 47–73.
Bunt, H.C. (2000) Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. In: H.C. Bunt & W.J. Black (eds.) Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue, Studies in Computational Pragmatics, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 81–150.
Bunt, H.C. Ahn, R., Kievit, L.A., Piwek, P., Verlinden, M., Beun, R.J., Borghuis, T. & Overveld, C. van (1998) Multimodal cooperation with the DenK System. In: H.C. Bunt, R.J. Beun, & T. Borghuis (eds.) Multimodal Human-Computer Communication. Berlin: Springer, 39–67.
Copestake, A. and Briscoe, E. (1995) Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. Journal of Semantics 12(1), 15–67.
Coquand, T. and Huet, G. (1988) The calculus of constructions. Information and Computation 76, 95–120.
Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M., Appelt, D. & Martin, P. (1993) Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63, 69–142.
Hobbs, J.R. (2001) Syntax and Metonymy. In: P. Bouillon & F. Busa (eds.) The Language of Word Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 290–311. Also available at http://www.ai.sri.com/hobbs/metsyn/metsyn.html.
Kievit, L. (1998) Context-driven Natural Language Interpretation. Ph.D. Thesis, Tilburg University, 1998.
Kievit, L., P. Piwek, R.J. Beun & H.C. Bunt (2001) Multimodal Cooperative Resolution of Referential Expressions in the DENK system. In H. Bunt & R.J. Beun (eds.) Multimodal Generation, Interpretation and Cooperation. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2155. Berlin: Springer, 202–220.
Lascarides, A. and A. Copestake (1998) Pragmatics and Word Meaning. Journal of Linguistics 34, 387–414.
Martin-Löf P. (1984) Intuitionistic Type Theory. Naples: Bibliopolis.
Nederpelt, R., Geuvers, H. and de Vrijer, R. (1994) (eds.) Selected Papers on Automath. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 133, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Nunberg, G. (1979) The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3(1), 143–184.
Nunberg, G. (1995) Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109–133.
Pustejovsky, J. (1993) Type Coercion and Lexical Selection. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.) Semantics and the Lexicon, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 49, 73–94, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Verspoor, C. (1997) Conventionality-Governed Logical Metonymy. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg 1997, 300–312.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bunt, H., Kievit, L. (2001). Agent-Dependent Metonymy in a Context-Change Model of Communication. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R., Thijsse, E. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0451-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0572-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive