Skip to main content

Optimization and Benchmarking of Truncated Dempster-Shafer for Airborne Surveillance

  • Chapter
Multisensor Fusion

Part of the book series: NATO Science Series ((NAII,volume 70))

  • 1141 Accesses

Abstract

Evidential reasoning requirements that Decision Support Systems (DSS) must often address necessitate that one must:

  1. (1)

    process incomplete information, which implies that ignorance should be defined mathematically

  2. (2)

    not require a priori information, which usually rules out Bayes reasoning

  3. (3)

    handle conflicts between contact/track so that formalisms such as Dempster- Shafer (DS), where conflict is precisely defined, are favored

  4. (4)

    have a real-time method, which means that DS truncation is a must

  5. (5)

    present the operator with the best ID, i.e. give preference to singletons

  6. (6)

    present the operator with the next best thing, i.e. doublets, then triplets...

  7. (7)

    be tested operationally, which translates into building complex scenarios

  8. (8)

    ensure that ordinary DS explodes, which requires a large complex Platform Data Base (PDB)

  9. (9)

    resist Counter Measures (CM) such that several contact reports should conflict with information contained in the PDB

  10. (10)

    resist false associations, i.e. ESM reports associated to wrong track

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Valin, P. and Boily, D., (2000) “Truncated Dempster-Shafer Optimization and Benchmarking”, SPIE Aerosense 2000, in Sensor Fusion: Architecture, Algorithms and Applications IV, Vol. 4051, pp. 237–246, Orlando.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jouan, A. Valin, P. and Bossé, E., (1999) “Testbed for Fusion of Imaging and Non-Imaging Sensor Attributes in Airborne Surveillance Missions”, FUSION’ 99 conference, Vol. 2, pp. 823–830, Sunnyvale, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheaito, A. Lecours, M. and Bossé, E., (1999) “Study of a modified Dempster-Shafer approach using an Expected Utility Interval decision rule”, SPIE Aerosense 1999, in Sensor Fusion: Architecture, Algorithms and Applications III, Vol. 3719, pp. 34–42, Orlando.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valin, P., Boily, D. (2002). Optimization and Benchmarking of Truncated Dempster-Shafer for Airborne Surveillance. In: Hyder, A.K., Shahbazian, E., Waltz, E. (eds) Multisensor Fusion. NATO Science Series, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0556-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0556-2_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0723-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0556-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics