Skip to main content

Abstract

The projects of sustainable development constitute a world basically created out of what has been labelled “essentially contested concepts”2: ecology, growth, development, basic needs, sustainability, justice, welfare and maybe the most tricky of them all — democracy. Despite this, in discourses on sustainable development most of these concepts are over and over again treated as if they were the most self-evident matters of course. Their ambiguity, complexity and obscurity are only sporadically commented on in this context. The reason for this seemingly strange fact is certainly strategic needs for rhetorical power, in order to reach co-operation, decisions and implementation in the complex “ecological areas”. To make anything substantial happen in the political realm of ecology, it is generally necessary to reduce the comprehensive complexity related to sustainability both in the social and in the ecological spheres. One prominent strategy to simplify these issues is to use the well-known classical narratives of modernity, applied to generally accepted ecological goals. In these narratives the above-mentioned concepts, all with a positive aura, are fundamental, but explorations of them in political discourses are rare.

‘No questions are more difficult than those of democracy, in any of its central senses’1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous (1992): Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action From Rio. UNCED, United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1997): Agenda 21 i Sverige. Fern år efter Rio — resultat och framtid. SOU 1997:105. Nationalkommittén for Agenda 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2000): En hållbar demokrati! Politik för folkstyret på 2000-talet. Demokratiutredningen, SOU 2000:1. Fritzes, Stockholm. [Official Government Report 2000:1 by Government Commission on Swedish Democracy.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshelm, J. (1992): Vattenkraft och naturskydd: En analys av opinionen mot vattenkraftsutbyggnaden i Sverige 1950–1990. Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshelm, J. (1995): Socialdemokraterna och miljöfrågan: En studie av framstegstankens paradoxer. Stockholm/Stehag: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshelm, J. (1996): Bland trollkarlar och demoner: Om kärnkraftsdiskursen i Sverige under 1950-talet. Vest: Tidskrift för vetenskapsstudier, 9:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anshelm, J. (1999): Mellan frälsning och domedag: debatten om kärnkraften 1945–1999. Stockholm/Stehag: Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1976): Symbolic Exchange and Death. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage Publications, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1988): Is there a postmodern sociology? In: Seidman, S. (ed.): The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U.(1999): Risk Society — Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M.(1982): All that Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (1993): The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton University Press, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972): Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T. (1993): Preface — Democracy and Science. In: Renn, O., Webler, T. and Peter Wiedeman, P. (eds.): Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1990): Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, N. (1967): The Modern Century. Toronto, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, G. (1998): Arbetarklassens återkomst. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981): Modernity — an Incomplete Project. In: Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, M.W (eds.): Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, Berkely, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.(1985): The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995a): Ecological Modernisation as Cultural Politics. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds.): Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995b): The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990): The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrén, J. (1994): Miljöpolitikens natur. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science: 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991): Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H.(1984): The Imperative of Responsibility — In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöfver, H.(1995): Miljömedvetenhet och livsstil bland organiserade ungdomar. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science: 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1990): New Reflections on The Revolution of Our Time. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H.(1974): The Production of Space. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, L. J. (1997): Sweden. In: Jänicke, M. and Weidner, H. (eds.): National Environmental Policies — A Comparative Study of Capacity-building. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1990): Ecological economics: energy, environment and society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mels, T. (1999): Wild Landscapes — The Cultural Nature of Swedish National Parks. Lund University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (ed.)(1992): Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, O. (1990): Makten över tanken — en bokom detsvenska massmediesamhället. Stockholm: Carlsson Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1996): Wasted — Counting the Costs of Global Consumption. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (ed.)(1995): Demokrati som dialog, Stockholm: SNS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddenberg, N.(1995): Det stora sammanhanget: Moderna svenskars syn på människans plats i naturen. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1976): Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1980): Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hedrén, J. (2002). Critical Notes on Sustainability and Democracy. In: Svedin, U., Aniansson, B.H. (eds) Sustainability, Local Democracy and the Future: The Swedish Model. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0496-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0496-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3943-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0496-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics