Advertisement

Critical Notes on Sustainability and Democracy

  • Johan Hedrén
Chapter

Abstract

The projects of sustainable development constitute a world basically created out of what has been labelled “essentially contested concepts”2: ecology, growth, development, basic needs, sustainability, justice, welfare and maybe the most tricky of them all — democracy. Despite this, in discourses on sustainable development most of these concepts are over and over again treated as if they were the most self-evident matters of course. Their ambiguity, complexity and obscurity are only sporadically commented on in this context. The reason for this seemingly strange fact is certainly strategic needs for rhetorical power, in order to reach co-operation, decisions and implementation in the complex “ecological areas”. To make anything substantial happen in the political realm of ecology, it is generally necessary to reduce the comprehensive complexity related to sustainability both in the social and in the ecological spheres. One prominent strategy to simplify these issues is to use the well-known classical narratives of modernity, applied to generally accepted ecological goals. In these narratives the above-mentioned concepts, all with a positive aura, are fundamental, but explorations of them in political discourses are rare.

Keywords

Political Party Environmental Politics Political Parti Ecological Modernization Environmental Crisis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous (1992): Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action From Rio. UNCED, United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1997): Agenda 21 i Sverige. Fern år efter Rio — resultat och framtid. SOU 1997:105. Nationalkommittén for Agenda 21.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous (2000): En hållbar demokrati! Politik för folkstyret på 2000-talet. Demokratiutredningen, SOU 2000:1. Fritzes, Stockholm. [Official Government Report 2000:1 by Government Commission on Swedish Democracy.]Google Scholar
  4. Anshelm, J. (1992): Vattenkraft och naturskydd: En analys av opinionen mot vattenkraftsutbyggnaden i Sverige 1950–1990. Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University.Google Scholar
  5. Anshelm, J. (1995): Socialdemokraterna och miljöfrågan: En studie av framstegstankens paradoxer. Stockholm/Stehag: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion.Google Scholar
  6. Anshelm, J. (1996): Bland trollkarlar och demoner: Om kärnkraftsdiskursen i Sverige under 1950-talet. Vest: Tidskrift för vetenskapsstudier, 9:1.Google Scholar
  7. Anshelm, J. (1999): Mellan frälsning och domedag: debatten om kärnkraften 1945–1999. Stockholm/Stehag: Symposion.Google Scholar
  8. Baudrillard, J. (1976): Symbolic Exchange and Death. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli: Sage Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. (1988): Is there a postmodern sociology? In: Seidman, S. (ed.): The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, U.(1999): Risk Society — Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Berman, M.(1982): All that Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Connolly, W. E. (1993): The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton University Press, 3rd edition.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972): Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  14. Dietz, T. (1993): Preface — Democracy and Science. In: Renn, O., Webler, T. and Peter Wiedeman, P. (eds.): Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, F. (1990): Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Frye, N. (1967): The Modern Century. Toronto, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greider, G. (1998): Arbetarklassens återkomst. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers förlag.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. (1981): Modernity — an Incomplete Project. In: Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, M.W (eds.): Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, Berkely, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Habermas, J.(1985): The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hajer, M. A. (1995a): Ecological Modernisation as Cultural Politics. In: Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. and Wynne, B. (eds.): Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. London, Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Hajer, M. A. (1995b): The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harvey, D. (1990): The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Hedrén, J. (1994): Miljöpolitikens natur. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science: 110.Google Scholar
  25. Jameson, F. (1991): Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Jonas, H.(1984): The Imperative of Responsibility — In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Klöfver, H.(1995): Miljömedvetenhet och livsstil bland organiserade ungdomar. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science: 126.Google Scholar
  28. Laclau, E. (1990): New Reflections on The Revolution of Our Time. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Lefebvre, H.(1974): The Production of Space. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Lundqvist, L. J. (1997): Sweden. In: Jänicke, M. and Weidner, H. (eds.): National Environmental Policies — A Comparative Study of Capacity-building. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Martinez-Alier, J. (1990): Ecological economics: energy, environment and society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Mels, T. (1999): Wild Landscapes — The Cultural Nature of Swedish National Parks. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mouffe, C. (ed.)(1992): Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  34. Petersson, O. (1990): Makten över tanken — en bokom detsvenska massmediesamhället. Stockholm: Carlsson Förlag.Google Scholar
  35. Redclift, M. (1996): Wasted — Counting the Costs of Global Consumption. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  36. Rothstein, B. (ed.)(1995): Demokrati som dialog, Stockholm: SNS.Google Scholar
  37. Uddenberg, N.(1995): Det stora sammanhanget: Moderna svenskars syn på människans plats i naturen. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya DoxaGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, R. (1976): Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, R. (1980): Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Hedrén
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Water and Environmental Studies, Tema InstituteLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations